On 1/31/11, Laurentin Lévesque laurent...@sympatico.ca wrote:
With my choir we're doing lots of highly syncopated music this year. I am
trying to rewrite my voice parts (with the lyrics) while having the
beatcounts
printed on top of the staff in their proper location with respect to the
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:07:58AM -0800, ornello wrote:
\version 2.12.2
{
\time 4/4
\grace s
\bar ||
c''4
}
but this is not working for multiple staves.
I suggest
\partial 64 s64
\bar ||
and I'm pretty certain it'll work if you put it in all staves.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 09:19:35PM +0530, Disc Magnet wrote:
However, in the midi generated only 8 notes are played: C E G E C F A F.
I expect a total of 12 notes to be played: C E G E C F A F C F A F.
How can I make the repeat effective in the MIDI file as well?
Assuming you're looking at
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:31:43PM +0800, Ben Luo wrote:
Today I checked out lilypond web from
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=summary
But it seems old. Is there any latest repo to pull?
The website is now built from the main source; the web branch is
obsolete. We are
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:22:12AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 21.12.2010 03:17, schrieb Graham Percival:
Excellent! How do we move forward and include this font?
btw are there any other nice fonts that we could include as well?
Somebody produces a patch, for lilypond git and/or GUB
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:11:50AM +, James Lowe wrote:
[James Lowe] the last update was 17 hours ago (by me).
Before that 2 more checkins were made in the last 2 days.
So I am not sure what you mean by 'old'.
He's talking about the web branch, where the last update was 6
months ago,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2011/1/19 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) - thoughts?
In my opinion this issue is important and
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:49:01PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
Please submit a bug report and let's get it in the tracker.
Doubly so if it's a regression.
Exactly
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:58:46PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
Graham,
2011/1/19 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
If necessary, we can pretend that it's deliberate (after noting it
in the Changes document), call it a non-regression, make it
non-critical, and have a release
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:24:11PM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
These functions should be bundled in a snippet, or perhaps included in the
lilypond distribution?
Start by adding it to LSR.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:09:51PM -0800, Keith OHara wrote:
Dear docs editors,
Patch attached.
(I had to wrap long lines of .ly; tried to pick a consistent indentation.)
Doc policy is 2-space indents, and in the case where you're
wrapping a long line, indent the first wrapped line by 2
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:46:42AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
I know that you were working on an old file which doesn't follow
this policy, but would you mind making the examples follow this?
Never mind; it's fine as it is.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:58:15PM +, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 14 January 2011 21:04, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Sometimes I am inclined to just commit and be done. After all, this
would just omit a warning in working cases, and would fix the totally
broken warning message when
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:39:59AM -0500, Ralph Palmer wrote:
I've tried the Learning Manual and the Snippets List. The closest I can
come would be something like :
3A A 3A A 2
A +A A +
8A A 8A A 8
Can anyone help me out?
I wrote some nice functions which do this a
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:23:23PM +0100, Éditions IN NOMINE wrote:
Well I have used such tricks someone told me to use.
For instance :
#(define ((double-time-signature glyph a b) grob)
(grob-interpret-markup grob
(markup #:override '(baseline-skip . 2.5) #:number
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:56:22PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
To be honest, I don't understand, why the Instrument_name_engraver is not
added to all staff group contexts by default. It is a very simple engraver,
so
it would not induce much overhead.
Sounds good to me.
Cheers,
-
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:41:22AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
As far as I can see, there is not much more to do than just omit the
warning for parallel music when the output is sensible. The extra
angles for being allowed (and required) to put the durations inside
seem like a reasonably
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:12:30PM +0100, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
\paper {
paper-width = 210\mm
left-margin = 20\mm
right-margin = 30\mm
line-width = 100\mm
}
try:
indent = 0\mm
as long as you have no instrument names, it should be fine.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:04:50AM -0500, Marc Mouries wrote:
i'd like to know about the rationale behind not supporting chords with notes
of different duration.
Because there's no such thing as a chord with notes of different
duration.
In the case typesetting violin music it would be much
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:15:41AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2011, um 09:02:19 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:04:50AM -0500, Marc Mouries wrote:
i'd like to know about the rationale behind not supporting chords with
notes of different
LilyPond 2.13.46 is out; this is the first release candidate of
the upcoming 2.14 stable release. All users are invited to
experiment with this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed
in the “Changes” manual on the website section about Development.
http://lilypond.org/development.html
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:17:46PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Before moving to computer science, I was a cello teacher. And I'm now
playing first violin in an orchestra doing, amongst other things,
Tchaik's Romeo and Juliet. I also
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 01:28:29PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
I've also
added a couple paragraphs explaining my understanding of U.S. copyright
law and urging users to accept the CC license with commercial restriction
in honor of Margaret GreenTree's patient labor while
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:16:44AM -0800, Mike Blackstock wrote:
Just to clarify: anything is copyrightable of course
That is false.
- there's no laws
that I'm aware of that
prevent people from asserting a copyright; question is, can it/has it a
chance of standing up?
You are
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:41:48PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
Thanks, Carl. I probably should have included some background
information. If I had only one piece of music to worry about, I'd do
it exactly as you suggest. Problem is I've got 404 Bach Chorales on
the Solfege Resources site
copyright,
then it is under copyright the instant that it is produced in
fixed form. (i.e. as soon as I type each letter of this
paragraph, it is under copyright -- even though I am not going to
append Copyright (c) 2011 Graham Percival to this email)
Given the above, it seems that an important
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:09:52PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
Thanks Graham, it's good to get the straight story! I must say there are
certainly some confusing aspects to copyright law.
First, I must clarify that I cannot give you a straight story. To
begin with, I am not a certified
We think that we've finished creating our Ubuntu LilyPond
Developer Remix (lilydev; formerly know as lilybuntu). It would
be helpful if more people could test the latest version. Begin
here:
http://lilypond.org/help-us.html
and look under advanced tasks.
One note: the current iso image
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:08:38PM +0100, Phil Hézaine wrote:
Moreover, there are chorals which aren't changed from the Public Domain.
I've checked some of it against my sources. Well, only a little bit.
And i'm not sure of the data integrity of her typesetting.
Interesting.
Then, why to
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:36:50AM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I found that on weblily.net the processing is surprisingly fast. Is there
a known trick to make it so? I mean something like having GUILE loaded in
the memory?
I don't know about weblily, but you might be
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 06:07:28PM -0800, Marc M wrote:
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
and does it make the download size much much bigger.
How much is much much? Gonville is 3.5 MB, the Jazz font is 10 KB.
Downloading
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:57:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
where can i get the source code of the music fetured here
http://lilypond.org/examples.html ?
in git. Documentation/web/ly-examples/
No, they're not going to be click-through available. Before
complaining, search the mailing
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:45:38PM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
2010/12/19 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
while i'm waiting for new Lilybuntu to be finished, i'd like to learn
more about music engraving rules. I found lists of books on the
No need to wait. You can use it
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
although the German
page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
Depends on the legal jurisdiction -- which,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In my non-expert (I am not a lawyer) opinion, the current except on
the German page would contravene Canadian copyright law.
It depends on whether the quote makes sense
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:33 PM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Well my point was with some of our duller Inspirational Headwords, I am
always on the look out for 'interesting' LilyPond files that we could
potentially use in the Doc.
Invent something from scratch.
So thinking if this
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:19:27PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
It looks like a 2.14 release blocker to me.
I agree.
Could we get an issue number? You don't need to have a tiny
example or image, but I'd like to see something in the tracker to
show that we have more than one critical issue.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:32:09PM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 14.12.2010 14:23, schrieb Marc Mouries:
wow the font is really nice for song books. I also discovered the
Gonville fonts and it would be great if those fonts be included
into lilypond out of the box and the selection of font made
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:02:11PM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
Ok, you're right - but IMHO 1204 is about documenting the new font features,
whereas Marc Mouries proposed to include the Jazz font and Gonville into the
standard lilypond distribution, which is another issue.
Does it make sense to
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
and does it make the download size much much bigger.
How much is much much? Gonville is 3.5 MB, the Jazz font is 10 KB.
Downloading lilypond is 20 MB, so personally, I don't think this would
break the much much bigger clause.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
In my opinion, the absolute ideal alternative is to use Wubi (it would
work great with LilyBuntu, btw):
Does it work on OSX?
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
I'm looking at:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/lilybuntu.html
We currently recommend VirtualBox Open Source Edition for lilypond
contributors. However, the download page (no longer?) has binaries
available for the open-source edition:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Graham,
Do our windows contributors just use the
non-open source edition of virtualbox?
I guess I do then (and also for my Mac). Is that a bad thing?
The only reason it would be a bad thing is if their license forbids
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The only reason it would be a bad thing is if their license forbids
using it to contribute to open-source projects. I consider
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:33:01PM -0800, -Eluze wrote:
howsoever it would be nice to have such a program released by Lilypond!
This is a known request. I think it's number 700-something or
900-something in the issue tracker. If you're interested, look
for it and read the past discussion.
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:38:17AM -0800, -Eluze wrote:
is there a reason why the indenting program indent.py which was available
in former versions of lilypond is not included anymore?
Err, I don't remember having any indent.py as part of lilypond.
What version did you see it in?
Cheers,
-
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:02:08AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Why don't Horn players get a second date? (...)
please, don't post such vulgar jokes here. In my opinion it's a
shame for the project.
I agree.
However, it's one of the best jokes I've ever heard recently, and it
was
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:50 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net writes:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
Not sure what to raise an issue about concerning convert.ly, though.
convert-ly prints a NOT_SMART
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
- this snippet is some kind of a hack anyway, and IIRC your official
policy is that convert-ly must handle pristine LilyPond code, but if
you use hacks then you're on your own :-)
Hmm, good point.
That's not
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 03:57:26PM +0100, James wrote:
Yes I thought about that after I sent the links. I have never tried
to create a rhythmic staff myself. It does make you wonder though,
the point of making the note heads fall above or below the singe
line of this staff.
Wood blocks?
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:53:46PM +0200, James Bailey wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 10:08 PM, James Lowe wrote:
What I don't understand is what the *1/4 and *4 are doing in this
context. Is this documented?
See 1.2.1 in the Notation Reference, Scaling Durations.
I personally wouldn't
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
\relative
\new Staff { d1 }
\new Staff { \tempo foo d1 }
\new Staff \with{ \consists ... }
, I assume? You only want to display the metronome mark in this staff, right?
Regardless of the location of \tempo, the
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 06:26:21PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
I'm not at all certain that's a good idea. The dynamics won't be
present in MIDI (which is probably no great loss), but more
importantly, it messes up the semantics for no particularly
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:25:57PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
PS: How can I find out who has written that snippet?
I don't believe that there is any way. It's just possible that
LSR keeps track of snippet authors, but I can't recall seeing
anything like that.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Now approved. http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=719 . This will
mean deleting snippet 713, since I've renamed this. I always like
to check before doing that - anyone any problems with that deletion?
If the new one has exactly
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Think this is worth a snippet? Also possibly a mention in the NR?
Since it's a tweak, not in the main Notation, If it's not a snippet,
then of course it would be helpful to add to LSR and tag with docs
and pitches.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 04:52:28PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:
2010/10/15 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
Hi,
an idea about tuplets came to my head (and a quick seach suggested that it
wasn't discussed before).
It _has_ been discussed before.
One think I don't like,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:24:45PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
I found I can move the chord symbols by moving the \chordmode block
before the \new Staff. What puzzles me is the c 1*4 syntax; that I
can't get to produce anything. In order to get 4 C notes, I had to
\repeat unfold 4 { c1 }
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:44:12PM +1000, Alan E. Davis wrote:
I have discovered lilypond, mainly as a way to print excellent sheet music
with tabs and staff that has been initially cobbled together in
tuxguitar. After spending a little time trying to understand lilypond, I
have
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:04:46PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 03:59 +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
and you'll see a similar thing. There's a special context
called... err... NoteHeadAutoSplit ? nope, that's totally
wrong... anyway, that thing automatically splits
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:47:26PM +0200, James Bailey wrote:
I was actually doing it to build the snippets in the regression tests, I
wanted to build all of them with 10 different processes simultaneously. I
didn't time it, but I think it came out much faster.
And, I still cannot build
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time guessing obvious things
and it can
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:43:10AM +0200, James Bailey wrote:
Is there a reason that the link in the footer goes to the old website,
http://lilypond.org/web/ and not the new website, http://lilypond.org/ ?
The reason is that nobody noticed that until now. Bug Squad:
please add this as a
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:21:49AM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote:
2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
This is rather for bug-lilypond, i'd say. In lilypond-user it is customary to
send
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
1. Open Email
2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply
Yes.
If someone sends an ly file that is umpty-thrumpty lines long
let's add one more point:
2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 10:31:05AM -0400, Mike Solomon wrote:
file with lilypond, and displays the resultant png on a webpage. I imagine
that the LSR is not unlike this, and I've found a few internet threads about
people who have done this sorta thing, so I imagine that it's not too
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/index
Graham, I haven't been following the website changes very closely, but
it looks like, in order to reach the development manuals, I have to
click 5 links (from
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
So I would conclude - if you need excellent screen display, you'll either
need a carefully written PDF viewer, or a screen with a resolution of around
1000 dpi.
If anybody is seriously interested in this issue, then why
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 06:44:58PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Phil Burfitt
phil.burf...@talktalk.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
Graham Percival wrote
PS if you want
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:59:32PM +0100, Phil Burfitt wrote:
Lilypond _prints_ really beautiful scores, but the pdf's quality on
screen are poor compared to the other major notation software. I'm
using Adobe Reader 8 on Vista at 96dpi resolution and bar lines have
varying thickness and often
LilyPond 2.13.34 is out; this is the first alpha test of the
upcoming 2.14 stable release. Users are invited to experiment with
this version. New features since 2.12.3 are listed in the
“Changes” manual on the website section about Development [1]
[1] http://lilypond.org/development.html
One
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:31:00PM -0700, -Eluze wrote:
there is also this (quite hidden undocumented, but working!):
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible
\set Score.barNumberVisibility = #(modulo-bar-number-visible 2 1 )
Please add it to LSR.
Cheers,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:49:08PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
One can run lilypond with the --safe switch (or, in recent versions,
-dsafe) to avoid a security risk when compiling .ly files. Is there
an equivalent switch for lilypond-book?
Other than using --process (which you did already), no.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:39:30PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 21/09/2010 5:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:49:08PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
One can run lilypond with the --safe switch (or, in recent versions,
-dsafe) to avoid a security risk when compiling .ly
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 07:35:56PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 21/09/2010 5:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
I think
this is a sufficiently esoteric request
Well, seeing that such a feature has made it into lilypond, there is
some use-case for it. Is the maintainer of lilypond-book reading
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, aliteralmind
aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
Where exactly are they, please?
Um. Learning Manual 5. Entitled Working on LilyPond
projects.
I read the learning manual. I didn't find the words best
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:36:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I'm generally normally quite helpful (or try to be). It was just that
Graham had given you all the information you needed - you just needed
to read it and spend a little while wondering
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:07:28PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, David Kastrup wrote:
It is agreed-upon best practice _not_ to use those abbreviations on the
general user list.
I agree, but: Since many people use these abbreviations, Would it be
an an idea to
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:55 PM, aliteralmind
aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com wrote:
I believe it should be easier to find for a relative
newcomer such as myself.
Much of the documentation navigation was revamped almost a year ago
and is present in the 2.13 devel version. This should be much
2010/9/14 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng hhpmu...@163.com:
PS. I'm totally frustrated with the latest versions of devel, whose spacing
is becoming stranger and stranger.
This is why I have announced, for EVERY SINGLE devel release, that
normal users should NOT be attempting to use the unstable releases.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
janneke-l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It does, however, give a nice opportunity for interesting release
messages/names, eg: ``we proudly present you lilypond 2.13.34 aka the
all spacing goes fubar release. The good news is that 4 bugs
were fixed.''
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 08:40:48AM -0700, Jebus wrote:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p29685494/Screenshot.png
I've tried many solutions, but I just can't get it right.
I would code this as two separate voices, and change the font size
of the lower voice to #-2 or #-3. I don't think that
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:37:58AM +0100, Reg Ludions wrote:
is there a way to see the changes to Lilypond with each incremental
development version (the zs in version x.y.z), as against the changes
between y versions? I can't seem to locate this in the various versions of
the docs - are
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:08:06PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:37:58AM +0100, Reg Ludions wrote:
is there a way to see the changes to Lilypond with each incremental
development version (the zs in version x.y.z), as against the changes
between y versions? I
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Cameron Horsburgh cammobla...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't do this.
We're not going to change anything, and I don't know why people keep
on talking about changing the mailing list.
If anybody wants to get something special in the subject line, their
email client
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Richie Gress searchfgold67...@live.com wrote:
Could I have a little bit of help in doing these things, especially with the
rhythms I need? I appreciate it very much...
The manuals should provide all the help you need; all those questions
are clearly answered in
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:16:06AM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote:
But this makes me wonder: I vaguely remember a distinction of \score
and \new Score, which I can't find in the docs.
The distinction is that \new Score should not be used, and issue
1033 is to remove it entirely from the docs.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Mike Blackstock wrote:
Hey, it's excellent I think. I say 'I think' cause I'm on a library
computer and it's hard to judge the 'travel' of the keys and when they
hit the bed so to speak and there's no sound.. Is there suppose to be
a metronome sound?
Hey guys,
As many of you know, I've been working on educational games to
help music students practice rhythms and intonation. Well, I'm
finally ready to begin tests of aspects of these programs; the
first test is to detect the tempo of a student-performed rhythm.
I've written an online flash
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:25:16PM +0200, TheBachMan wrote:
I use Lilypond for some time now, and I often find my answers in the
documentation (very well done), the LSR and on the French mailing-list,
very active!
A bass line that splits into two with braces and returns on a
The LilyPond Report is back, with its two “grumpy-and-fluffy”
editors! This issue contains some conference news, along with the
regular release news, snippet of the report, news from the frog
pond, and the bug report of the report!
Come read LilyPond Report 19 now; comments and contributions are
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:01:15PM +0100, James wrote:
(seems an awful lot of work to just change a few lines in a snippet
though :( ).
The idea is if we add a convert-ly rule, then any user files which
include the old syntax can be automatically updated. The focus
here is on the end-user,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:26:15AM -0700, ornello wrote:
In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at
least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave. Is there any option
to speed up Lilypond, e.g. by removing time-consuming engravers, such that
the
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:54:01PM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 6 August 2010 22:31, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
There's a section in the Learning manual called speeding up
lilypond, or something like that. This sounds like a good place
to look.
Are you speaking
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:22:05PM -0400, jim.showalter wrote:
I have been reviewing the online manuals and am having trouble finding
documentation that describes the overall architecture of the Lilypond
system.
If you're looking at the 2.13 docs,
http://lilypond.org/website/development.html
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
p.s. The search function in the 2.13 online doc searches the wrong version.
p.s. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1171
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:44:42AM -0700, Jayaratna wrote:
I am copying a score because I need to make parts: I need to put some texts
and other marks on single parts but I would like them not to appear on every
line of the score, but just at the top of each group. Any suggestion about
how
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:14:38PM -0400, Mike Blackstock wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
You might be interested in the second chapter of my Masters
thesis, which is about using Strasheela to create
Wow, thx. Is it online?
http
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:17:51PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
But thinking about this little project I was wondering: Would it be
possible to write a lilypond input file, using just pure Lilypond syntax
and some Scheme magick, that would produce a different score each time
you
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 03:47:26PM -0400, Mike Blackstock wrote:
Me too I've long been interested in this; I'd like to be able to
generate endless sight-reading exercises/material for guitarists,
perhaps in the form of duos with the computer playing one of the parts
just to keep things
301 - 400 of 2971 matches
Mail list logo
