Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
following was written by David Kastrup:
You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
all unless a minimum is met, meaning that I have to finance the whole
month on my own. This is not exactly
On 2012-05-21 13:09, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
My suggestion for the name of this style would be contemporary
That only works from our particular point of view. If someone runs
Lilypond sometime far into the distant future or in the distant past,
they wouldn't see it as contemporary. I'd suggest a
On 2012-05-08 11:31, Urs Liska wrote:
cd 01_01_...
lilypond *.ly
cd ..
cd 01_02_...
..
in a form like
for dir in [get me all directories starting with a number]
do
cd $dir
lilypond *.ly
cd ..
done
Perhaps like so:
for dir in [0-9]*/;
do
cd $dir
lilypond *.ly
cd -
done
Jonas
Even though I do understand the nature of the valveless horn, I do not
see why one omits the key signature today. Just tradition doesn't really
explain it. Could someone clarify this? Here's how I understand it so
far:
On the valveless horn you change crooks to give the instrument a
transposition
Interesting to see the variations that occur.
fre 2012-04-27 klockan 11:50 -0700 skrev Tim Reeves:
Mozart horn concerto in D major (1791) - originally played on a
natural horn with a D crook, so written with no key signature - the
modern player playing on an F horn simply (!) transposes the
tis 2012-04-24 klockan 21:12 +0200 skrev Helge Kruse:
There are two brass instruments
(french horns). I am was told that these staves should be written
without key an without accidentals at the notes.
I think what you have in mind is the convention of not writing out a
_key signature_
Unless forte is considered to be in effect also at the beginning of the
second volta, the attached example becomes strange. (Edited with a music
engraving software called GIMP.)
Regards,
Jonas Olson
attachment: repeat_dynamics.png___
lilypond-user
sön 2012-03-04 klockan 00:40 +0100 skrev Thomas Morley:
some possibilities:
Thanks.
Perhaps this articulation could be included in the standard set. Is
there a name for it, by the way?
Jonas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
