Posting problem

. Thank you, Sami Amiris. -- Sami Amiris http://www.phosduo.com/sami-amiris/

Re: Line breaks in polymetric music

Thank you very much! A great solution! Many thanks! -S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Line breaks in polymetric music

A great thank you to all! I will implement these solutions to my piece. Thank you all once again! -S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Line breaks in polymetric music

Thank you for your response. I did research it and found nothing. Would you have a suggestion for me to look at? Thank you S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Line breaks in polymetric music

u spot the bars in question more easily. it is polymetric, so there are quite a few things that have to be written for the thing to be possible to begin with, so please excuse the minimum minimalism of the example. Thank you very much as always, Sami Amiris -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069

Re: Multiplicative Time Signatures

Absolutely!!! Thank you very much!!! -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Multiplicative Time Signatures

solved. Thank you -Sami -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thomas Morley-2 wrote > Regrettable, nope. > Try those segne-bar-lines... Thank you very much for your very detailed explanation! I appreciate it very much. Once I fully understand the technicals of lilypond and the scheme program that you wrote (I think I get it, I just need to play around with

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

> Instead of manually applying X-offset-overrides you may try: > > #(define end-of-line-right-aligned-sencil > (lambda (grob) > (let* ((break-dir (ly:item-break-dir grob)) >(basic-props (ly:grob-basic-properties grob)) >(stil-proc (assoc-get 'stencil (reverse

Re: Turning off selected spanbars in a Grandstaff

I would kindly ask you, how did you get the notes to look like this (straight beams, thinner overall look etc.)? If it distracts from the thread I apologize, but I am truly curious as to the visual aspect of it all. (The polymeter I understand.) -- Sent from:

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thank you, very much indeed. I obviously did some stupid mistake(s) of some sort or another, so once again thank you very much. Ptoblem solved! Cheers! -S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thank you for the suggestion. I have been playing around with your suggestions - which I am truly very thankful for, btw - and I have come to this so far: 1) The spanbar seems to be created at the bottom staff, at the "||-end" definition. 2) If the spanbar is double, like the bottom double

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thank you for the suggestion once again. I thank you for having spent some time on it. The whole idea is to create a mirror image of the compound barline on the beginning of the example, which means that they must align to the right, not to the left. Now it is a copy of the system at the

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thank you for the suggestion. I tried it, so far I haven't got results. One case that I actually aligned them well, I lost the "!" part of the barline in between. I will continue, though. It maybe that one particular combination of all things will produce a result. Thank you once again. -S.A.

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

I apologise for flooding your email. Just found out another issue that I would like your help, again with the barlines. Should I open another thread? I thought they were in the same topic as before. The question is: Is there a way to align the barlines correctly at the end of the system? I have

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thank you, that is what I meant. Thank you for the link as well. I would like to take the opportunity to that all of you great people. Lilypond plays basically without opponents when it comes to more "out-of-the-box" things, like polymeter and polytemporality, and I understand more and more every

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Actually I stand corrected! I made a mistake, I corrected it and it works fine! Thank you very much! This is the snippet! I know that it would do a lot for people like me, maybe it should be included in the section about barlines? Thank you once again! S.A.

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Hello all. Thomas Morley-2 wrote > \defineBarLine "||-end" #'("||" #f " !") > \defineBarLine "||-beg" #'("||" #f "!") > \defineBarLine "||-!" #'("||-end" "||-beg" "!") > \defineBarLine "|-dashedSpan" #'("|" "|" "!") > \defineBarLine "|-!" #'("|-dashedSpan" "|-dashedSpan" "!") > > Should do

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Hello and thank you for your reply. The reason for the not minimal example is because each staff has its own timing. This is polymetric notation, not simple notation. Each staff has its very own barlines, and when I put them in a group, the barlines are united only when the timing of the two

Re: lyp

I wrote it in Git. The code probably is in Ruby, but I don't know enough Ruby to fix it at this point anyway. I reported the problem and it is up to the developers now. Thanks again! S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Dear all, The more I see this, it looks like I either did something totally wrong, or it is a bug. I tried all sorts of combinations, but the behavior remains the same. If it looks like a bug and smells like a bug (it could very well NOT be a bug, I know it by now...). I would truly appreciate

Re: lyp

> Apart from reporting, it might be worth trying to use exterior tools > to convert the PS to PDF. The system versions might use a > self-consistent set of binaries and support files, even if all > they're > doing is using ghostscript at some level. You even have a choice of > linux and windows

Re: lyp

Well, that was a true surprise there. Yes, the ps file is fine. Its conversion to pdf seems to be the problem. Plus, it is all with the bravura font as I had written. Thank you for the tip. Never expected it tbh... Still, what do we do now? Apart from reporting it to the Git hub that is? Thank

Re: lyp

Thank you very much, will do. Yes, it looks very much like that. Thanks again. -S.A. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: lyp

Hello, and thank you both for your replies. Yes, it is the lyp program as described above by Mr. Urs Liska. I have a Fedora 31 system and a Windows system as well, but right now I am using the Fedora one. I use vim and call lilypond from the command line - the program gives me the output logs in

lyp

Hello esteemed members. I am not a power-user by any stretch of the imagination, so my questions might be a bit silly or worse. Still, I will be asking them if I don't find them answered somewhere, hoping to not impose too much. I recently read about a problem with Ghostscript relating to lyp.

Peculiar behavior of barlines

Hello all. I would like the barlines that span both staves (not the barlines in each individual staff alone) at the middle of the line to have the same behaviour at the next end (to the right) and the start of the line below at the very left. In other words, A1, A2 and A3 should all be the same

Re: Reverse Lilypond Book...

Thank you to everyone that took the time to answer! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Reverse-Lilypond-Book...-tp34046085p34048185.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user

Re: Reverse Lilypond Book...

Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Hi Sami, for the purpose of a text at the beginning of a music-book, I created a markup-list command. This command expects some installed commands: pdflatex and/or xelatex, pdftops and pdfinfo. I use ubuntu so this is installed via aptitude and callable

Reverse Lilypond Book...

Hi all! This has probably been asked before, but I haven't found it anywhere, so I ask it myself. Excuse any repetition, and please direct me there if it exists and you can find it easily. With lilypond-book and co, what I understood is that one writes a LaTeX document with lilypond snippets.

RE: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

I'm in the camp, with you, that prefers this particular bit of clutter. An end repeat barline makes my poor underworked neurons look feverishly for the begin repeat barline, and if it doesn't leap out at me, I'm in trouble. But I mostly sing more classical stuff. Jazz players live lives replete

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Problem Solved (I think): \version 2.14.2 \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = up { \clef treble \new Voice { \voiceOne \autochange

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Only if there is unrepeated music played before the repeated sections. Otherwise putting in any more elements than are necessary can cause unnecessary visual clutter. Ask me how I know. ;-) Look at most jazz lead sheets, there is usually no equivalent of \bar |: at the start or \bar :| at the

Problem with voices

I am sorry for any inconvenience to the group. I am a relative newbie, and I need help. When I type this: \version 2.14.2 \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = up{ \clef treble \new Voice = upper

Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Hello everyone. I have witnessed a weird behaviour, and when I posted it, a few good people that are way more experienced with lilypond than I am told me that there are probably quite a few bugs hidden within the examples. My main concern is with the failure of the stem up - stem down - and that

Problem with stems, voices, etc.

Please excuse anewbie question. This example is supposed to get me two distinct voices going from staff to staff on autopilot, when they pass by middle C. Here is the code: \version 2.14.2 \score { \new PianoStaff \new Staff = up{ \clef

Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

{ \stemDown{ bes4 c bes' c | d1 } -- Sami - Vasileios Amiris http://samiamiris.com/ http://www.myspace.com/samiamiris ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Actually, I tried to post it a lot of times, and they all failed. Then, they all got accepted together one day later. I am still trying to delete all the other failed attempts. Tim McNamara wrote: On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Sami sami.ami...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone. I have

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Btw, this is the one that I kept. All the others I deleted. Sorry for the whole mess. Sami wrote: Actually, I tried to post it a lot of times, and they all failed. Then, they all got accepted together one day later. I am still trying to delete all the other failed attempts. Tim

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

McNamara tim...@bitstream.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 2:35 PM Subject: Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around? On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Sami sami.ami...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone. I have witnessed a weird behaviour, You seem to have

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Normally, \bar |: at the very beginning is redundant and should be left out. Music with no \bar |: anywhere is always understood to go back to the beginnining. Typically yes, true, but it is much better vsually to define both the start and the end of the repeats, especially in exercises such

Re: Possible multiple bugs, any way around?

Yes, I realise that. Unfortunately, beginner's clumsiness... lilypond-user is a MAILING LIST, not a forum. You can delete the messages from nabble, but that does not un-send the many emails that were already sent. hjh -- View this message in context:

Lilypond-book + LaTeX (WinXP)

Hi everyone. I seem to have a problem with lilypond-book, when it calls latex. I have WinXP SP2, TexLive 2005 from Ctan (the whole thing), and Lilypond 2.9.18 (development). I did this (meaning, I installed the development version vs the stable one) to avoid some problems that I read were

Re: reminder accidentals

--- Benjamin Esham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 24, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Ridwan Sami wrote: i have this habit of forgetting to play certain notes as sharp of flat when a peice has a key signature other than c major. i would manually put in the ! for accidental reminders

Re: reminder accidentals

thanks, Benjamin Esham and Paul Scott for the help. the regular expressions did the trick. the problem with the accidental-style being set to 'forget is that it would not remind the reader of accidentals called by the key signature, only those specified and reused within a measure.

invoking midi2ly and using sustainup and sustaindown

i'm kind of new at this lilypond thing and i'm having two problems first off, i'm not even sure if i'm doing this right but i have lilypond installed thru cygwin on a windows xp and i am typing into the bash shell: $ midi2ly wee.mid and getting Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: Phrasing slur over polyphonic melodies

Why don't you simply put the two bars in the same line, like: {1( 2 3 | 7 8 9)} \\ {4 5 6 | a b c} - Sami Raphael Slinckx wrote: Hi ! I've a little problem I can't figure out, and I hope someone here knows the answer ! Imagine somthing like this (where numbers represent notes): {1 2 3

Re: Fingering

= #0.3 - Sami Huhtala Hallstein Lunde wrote: After a few hours of refreshing work I finally found out how to put fingerings _beneath_ the lower staff in a piano score. As far as I know, that should be the default direction by common engraving rules. It went like this: \override Fingering

Re: beaming problem

g a \set stemRightBeamCount = #1 b \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1 b a g f } -Sami Huhtala Roland Goretzki wrote: Hi, my version is 2.2.0. In a piece with \time 9/16 I need almost notes in the form eight sixteenth eight sixteenth eight sixteenth ... and so on. A little example: a8

Clashing leger lines in tight settings

so that they do not run together. Example: http://www.medialounge.com/lily2.png -Sami Huhtala ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Automatically assign override-values

Hi, I'm a bit unhappy with Lilypond's default ties and working on an idea to fix them. Is it possible to automatically assign override-values to a tie based on it's length? (e.g. if tie is short, say less than 5.0, to use certain 'x-gap -value). Sami