On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote:
Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I
write this now incorrect code:
a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]] i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes
joined by a single beam.
The question is: what is the context and why do you want this?
Added https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6702.
Hi David!
On 02.03.24 12:44, David Kastrup wrote:
Just naming an existing member should be enough since taggroups are
exclusive.
Like this, for example?
\tagGroup soprano,alto
\addTagToGroupWith soprano mezzosoprano
I think I tend to agree with Raphael that having a name for the tagGroup
On 01.03.24 14:29, David Kastrup wrote:
Simon Albrecht writes:
The downside of that is that I cannot add more tags to those groups on
the fly, and always have to add them directly to the library file.)
Suggestions for a user interface to do that?
Interesting. Would of course require
Hi Kieren,
On 29.02.24 15:42, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
I didn’t see an issue/request for quoting lyrics, so I added one
(https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6700) and we’ll see how the
discussion goes. :)
I was curious and tried, and in fact you can quote lyrics perfectly
well.
On 29.02.24 15:42, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
use both \keepWithTag_and_ \removeWithTag like this:
text = \lyricmode {
\tag A { on -- ly al -- to }
\tag nA { ev’ -- ry -- one ex -- cept al -- to }
}
#mindblown
Why didn’t I think of using set theory?!
THANK YOU! That hint
Hi David,
On 29.02.24 15:54, David Kastrup wrote:
I'd rather use
\tagGroup alto,non-alto
\lyricmode {
\tag alto { on -- ly al -- to }
\tag non-alto { ev’ -- ry -- one ex -- cept al -- to }
}
\keepWithTag alto ...
\keepWithTag non-alto ...
But one would need to look at the rest to see
Hi Kieren,
huge respect for the kind of projects you are doing :)
Answering these questions is difficult because they can depend a lot on
the specifics of the music and any solution can become cumbersome
because of only a little instance that doesn’t fit the schematic. A few
thoughts:
On
Dear Kieren,
I’d like to share two approaches I’ve developed for such issues. There’s
two caveats:
Firstly, I couldn’t take time to study your setup and how that makes
these approaches viable or not—sorry for that.
Secondly, if possible, I always try to use vanilla LilyPond tools, so I
Hi Yuriy,
it is possible, yes, but it’s not correct, unless you have a very
specific reason to make an exception from the rule. There’s a reason why
Lily provides commands for merging differently headed or differently
dotted notes, but only for notes with a stem. If you merge notes without
Hello Hajo,
I can’t answer your question, but I can say that the better place to ask
it would be either the Issue tracker in the Frescobaldi project on
Github, or via the contact adress included in Frescobaldi at Help->About.
Hope that helps!
Simon
On 26.09.23 21:51, Hajo Baess wrote:
This
Hi Kenneth,
On 18.09.23 04:31, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
what is an articulation that looks like a marcato but is shaped like a
half-moon?
This is from an arrangement of the Marcello Oboe Concerto (Adagio
movement) by way of Bach and/or Vivaldi, re-arranged for two trumpets,
french horn and tuba.
Hi Tom,
On 10.07.23 03:09, Tom Sgouros wrote:
And also for pointing out page-count. That does seem easiest and in
fact it worked. I always like it best when I can tell the computer,
"you're a computer, figure it out".
to add to that: The spacing considerations for music are enormously
Hi Abraham,
On 07.07.23 16:36, Abraham Lee wrote:
All,
This came up on the FB group and I determined that the problem is the
presence of the \acciaccatura. In the following passage, the
LyricExtender somehow misses the signal to end before the grace note
appears, forming a continuous line
On 28.06.23 00:54, Valentin Petzel wrote:
If you want a real alias (that is a second binding to the same function) you
can do
#(define acc acciaccatura)
This will create another binding to the same object
AFAIK,
acc = #acciaccatura
and likewise
af = #after
will have the same effect.
Best,
On 25.06.23 16:36, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
|\layout { \context { \Score \remove Metronome_mark_engraver
\cadenzaOn } \context { \Staff \remove Time_signature_engraver
\consists Metronome_mark_engraver } }|
Would the relatively new
\layout {
\enablePolymeter
}
be appropriate here? (plus of
Hello everyone,
it’s great to have LSR 1169 and it seems to be working as it should—many
thanks to Jean Abou Samra and Werner Lemberg!
However I’m sorry to write this mail because there is one issue I found
;) Any syllable but the last in a word doesn’t have point-and-click the
way it is
Hi Paul,
On 11.06.23 15:41, Paul McKay wrote:
A solution which would also allow me to insert a blank space between
scores (so I could begin a 2nd movement on an even-numbered page)
would be good, but my current request is just for an initial one.
Jean already gave one solution, another
Hi Jean, hi Werner,
On 05.06.23 22:28, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Well, for my defense, I did also post a revised version of the
“magnetic lyrics” snippet:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg149201.html
thanks for that pointer and your contributions. I reviewed that thread,
Hello everyone,
I don’t know where the “Lyric syllable magnetic snap” snippet is mainly
stored, I grabbed it from the list years ago and attach it in the
version that I have, from December 2011 and with links to user list
archive. I hope I’m not somehow behind time with this, having followed
Hi Pierre,
On 05.06.23 15:07, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
So how can I get the paper values as a markp?
the call to ly:output-def-lookup returns a number or an empty list. So
this returns valid markup regardless:
\version "2.24.1"
\paper {
top-margin =
On 10/02/2023 19:22, Saul Tobin wrote:
What is the reasoning behind having smaller relative blocks?
I agree that there are many factors in the workflow, project and
templates that influence this decision. I want to give just one example:
Piano score or similar with changing number and
Hi Darren,
On 10/02/2023 11:46, Darren Ng wrote:
\ghostNoteWhichDoesNotActuallyAppear { c,,, }
I think what you want here is \resetRelativeOctave.
The best solution depends on many factors around your workflow and the
setup of your project, but generally it is recommendable to split things
>>
\new ChoirStaff <<
\new Staff << \marks \B >>
>>
>>
Maybe I'm missing a way to do this while keeping the mark engravers in
the ChoirStaff context.
Saul
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 1:29 AM Simon Albrecht
wrote:
Hi Saul,
On 08/02/2023 2
Hi Saul,
On 08/02/2023 22:03, Saul Tobin wrote:
Is there a reason to have the marks in a child context rather than
just a simultaneous music variable?
You mean the Devnull? Just convenience. It works well with the way I
assemble different ChoirStaffs for different output formats and adding
Hello everyone,
I am working on a large score with several ChoirStaves and want to have
BarNumbers and Marks in the middle as well. However, when I use
\RemoveEmptyStaves, removed Staves still have their BarNumbers etc.
How can I solve this without hard-coding where the Staves are removed?
Hi Greg,
great to hear you’re starting with LilyPond!
On 30/08/2022 21:52, Greg Lindstrom wrote:
I see later in the documentation there is a snippet on how to merge
voices, so that's next on my list.
There’s one bit of important advice that usually makes the experience of
learning LilyPond
On 28/07/2022 16:25, David Kastrup wrote:
There is also \startTrillSpan/\stopTrillSpan, \startGroup/\stopGroup,
\startGraceSlur/\stopGraceSlur, \startTextSpan/\stopTextSpan,
\startMeasureCount/\stopMeasureCount,
\startMeasureSpanner/\stopMeasureSpanner . On the opposite side, there
is
Hi David,
On 25/07/2022 16:35, David Kastrup wrote:
You probably meant
\markup spanish = \markup \italic \etc
which defines a markup command. The way you wrote it, \spanish is just
a scheme function that happens to return the internals of a markup
command definition.
I did mean that.
Hello everyone,
On 24/07/2022 19:44, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion wrote:
Please refer to the Installing section in the
Learning Manual for instructions how to set up the provided binaries:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/installing
This link leads to a
Dear list,
I wanted to define a markup command for easy switchable styling of text
and ran into an issue which seems hard to understand:
\version "2.23.9"
spanish = \markup\italic \etc
\markup \column {
\spanish \justify { test }
}
=> “error: not a markup”
My
Hi mancunius,
On 20/07/2022 12:34, mancunius wrote:
Hello. In the following example I want the undertie to be placed
between the 2 “O sacrum convivium” lines of lyrics, to indicate that
no breath should be taken by the singers - as per the normal choral
convention. (cf. the commented-out
Hello,
On 07/07/2022 08:50, Rip _Mus wrote:
Good morning to everyone,
I am preparing a large orchestral work.
In my writing style, each instrument often has two voices in its
staff, for various reason (for example, each clarinet can handle two
voices when playing multiphonics trills with
On 02/07/2022 18:20, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Simon, you moved this from bug-lilypond to lilypond-user. Was that
intentional?
Did I? I’m sure I just clicked Reply All, and the thread as I received
is on the user list… this e-mail of yours is the first that for me shows
the bug list as
Hi David and others,
On 01/07/2022 12:32, David Kastrup wrote:
I don't think so. The problem is that repeats now support putting the
\alternative phrase inside of the construct since that is a saner way of
doing things. But the previous way is still supported for compatibility
reasons. Your
Hi Jacques,
On 27/06/2022 22:13, Jacques Menu wrote:
Does anyone know of some way to generate spiccato articulations in the scores
produced by Lily?
what would you expect that to look like?
{ a'4-! }
maybe?
Best, Simon
Hi David,
On 27/06/2022 21:07, David Kastrup wrote:
Before looking for a possible following `=`
LilyPond has to have made a decision what type the token/expression
coming before that has. It cannot look at the type of a #... expression
before deciding to look for `=` but it can (and will) look
Hi Jean,
On 27/06/2022 20:37, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 27/06/2022 à 20:10, Simon Albrecht a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I’m trying to encode a piece such that I can switch whether or not
durations will be shifted (note values halved/doubled). Unfortunately
\tempo isn’t affected
Hello everyone,
I’m trying to encode a piece such that I can switch whether or not
durations will be shifted (note values halved/doubled). Unfortunately
\tempo isn’t affected by \shiftDurations (that would be a sensible
feature request, right?), so I tried this:
%%%
Hi Jean,
thanks once more for the speedy and helpful reply!
On 06/06/2022 14:43, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
How can I change that?
That sounds like an XY question.
Sorry about that. I meant to imply: How do I swap the placement of the
headers?
What is the use case?
Having a large,
Hi everyone,
%%%
\version "2.23.9"
\bookpart {
\markup \fontsize #10 "general title"
\header {
title = "specific title"
}
\score {
{ 1 }
}
}
why does "general title" appear below "specific title" and not above?
How can I change that?
Best,
Hi Kevin,
On 02/06/2022 22:56, Kevin Cole wrote:
The hand-written score I'm looking at shows an F# with three slurs
coming off of it going to each of the three notes in the following
measure. I tried the following but it only shows one slur. What did I
miss?
without context it’s hard to tell
Hi Jean,
On 01/06/2022 22:41, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
As said on the ticket, you need to move \tocItem inside
the second bookpart,
thanks for looking into it and opening the issue. The workaround is
inconvenient, because I want to have the \bookpart{} statement in an
include file for use in
Hi Jean,
On 01/06/2022 15:24, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Please give an example.
I’ve gone debugging, and it’s a weird combination of two things that
causes the empty page:
%%%
\version "2.23.9"
\paper {
bookTitleMarkup = \markup {
\vspace #.3
}
}
\bookpart {
Hi everybody,
it’s been a long time since I’ve used bookPart, it seems, and I don’t
know how to search for an answer.
How can I allow Lily to start a bookPart on even pages? She will insert
empty pages to avoid that.
Best, Simon
Hi Jean,
On 27/05/2022 12:34, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
The solution for now is to use a plain Scheme function:
Thanks a bunch for the solution and explanations, that does it!
Best, Simon
Hi Andrew,
sorry that your investments into Dorico didn’t work out! It’s great to
have you back in the Pond :)
I have been thinking that it would be nice to invest more time into Lily
myself, but I don’t yet know whether/how/when I can make that happen.
Best, Simon
On 27/05/2022 10:24,
itle "I. Kyrie"
/tmp/frescobaldi-0fy0zxi0/tmpkd3e8qov/document.ly:11:1: error: bad expression
type
\pieceTitle "I. Kyrie"
%%%%%%
On 27/05/2022 12:21, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello everyone,
I’m a bit surprised that the following doesn’t work and
Hello everyone,
I’m a bit surprised that the following doesn’t work and don’t know where
to look for a solution.
% \version "2.23.9" pieceTitle =
#(define-scheme-function (str) (markup?) #{ \markup \huge $str
\noPageBreak #}) \pieceTitle "I. Kyrie" {
Hi Andrew,
thanks for the information. Sorry to hear about your illness and all the
best wishes nonetheless!
Best,
Simon
On 09/05/2022 09:53, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Hello All,
I've been absent from the list for a long time, but recently got CC'd
about an Openlilylib pull request.
I must
On 08/05/2022 20:37, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
The case study of how OLL fell out of maintenance is one of the
things leading me to think that a model where snippets providing
significant functionality and becoming somewhat popular get
upstreamed into the LilyPond core is a better fit for LilyPond
Dear community,
I have made some small updates to keep the openlilylib/bezier module
working with current versions of LilyPond and created a pull request on
GitHub. Is anyone currently able to notice and approve the request?
Best, Simon
Hi David,
On 16/04/2022 18:11, David Santamauro wrote:
Hi, it seems removing the Dynamic_performer doesn’t actually remove
performance of articulations.
Articulations are Script grobs, not Dynamics. Maybe removing
Script_engraver as well would do the trick? I don’t work with MIDI much,
so
Hi Jean,
On 11/04/2022 18:04, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Well, maybe it doesn't make sense anyway -- I don't think I've
ever seen a breathing sign in one staff and not another.
It definitely happens and is perfectly valid musically.
Breathing_sign_engraver sits in Voice (and similar) by
Hi Jacques,
On 11/04/2022 16:16, Jacques Menu wrote:
Also, what is the musical meaning of the ligatures above the staff?
these are not standard notation and it’s impossible to tell. Maybe the
larger context might give some hint, but most likely you’d need an
explanation in foreword or
Hi Jean,
On 25/03/2022 13:20, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
In English: these properties (X-extent, Y-extent, horizontal-skylines,
vertical-skylines) have implicit defaults, which are given when the
property is found not to be set. Now you're setting them to the empty
list, which for some reason
Hello everybody,
I want to try having Lyrics placed without regard for any stems in the
adjacent staff (and then using whiteout to remedy the clash, of course).
The below approach doesn’t work. Why? Can I make it work?
Best, Simon
\version "2.23.6"
\layout {
\context {
Dear list,
while engraving 17th century music, I have an issue with the way Lily
spaces large note values by default. If there are no shorter values
present, breve and whole notes receive almost the same horizontal space
which makes the rhythms hard to read. How can I override that?
Best,
Hi Colin,
I haven’t tried it myself, but generally publishers have a house style
and want all their publications to comply with that house style. It’s
offputting to me, because I have my own aesthetic preferences which
don’t match with what computer typesetting typically looks like, so I
Hi Valentin,
one line in your Scheme code confused me. If you don’t mind explaining,
why do you write
`(,CN ,FB ,VC . ,LY)
instead of
(list CN FB VC LY)
?
Best, Simon
On 22/02/2022 09:25, Valentin Petzel wrote:
Hello Tom,
A good template will separate content and form. Ideally you’d be
On 22/02/2022 14:07, Phil Holmes wrote:
We are proud to announce the release of GNU LilyPond 2.22.2 on 2-22-22
(i.e. February the 22nd, 2022).
Fabulous ;) Thanks to everyone involved!
On 22/02/2022 23:28, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Do you consider this inferior (or unnecessarily verbose and therefore
non-minimal)?
No, the motivation for that was more naive. You’re probably right that
it would actually be more minimal in a deeper sense to explicitly
instantiate the
Hi,
On 12/02/2022 20:22, jh wrote:
This is the shortest example I could figure out how to make
David and Lukas-Fabian have already answered the core question, so allow
me to comment on this: tiny examples are important for communication on
the list and it takes a while to learn how to make
to add a \right-align to have the actual
markup aligned to the right (you might want to change attach-dir to CENTER, as
the fff does the same.
We can infact add some sugar for this, like here.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Sonntag, 30. Jänner 2022, 22:20:58 CET schrieb Simon Albrecht:
Hi List
Hi List,
is there an equivalent to self-alignment-X for the left bound text of a
DynamicTextSpanner? See below.
Best, Simon
\version "2.23.5"
{
1-\tweak self-alignment-X 1 \fff
1
% this causes alignment to just fail indiscriminately
% (not a surprise, because I couldn’t find out how
considering that I almost exclusively use them either as
toplevelMusicFunctions or wrapping an entire score’s music.
Best, Simon
On 28/01/2022 15:17, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
Simon Albrecht writes:
Dear list,
I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags
Dear list,
I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and tagGroups. In
the following example, I thought the two staffs should look the same,
even without the \removeWithTag command, but they don’t:
\version "2.23.5"
% tested with 2.23.5 (guile2-build)
On 18/01/2022 18:52, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Because this is documentation for Guile 2
and current releases of LilyPond still have
Guile 1.8.
Thanks for the speedy reply! I wasn’t sure whether the switch to Guile 2
had already been made. I got it to work with the experimental binary you
Dear list,
I have started using the experimental 2.23.5 build with Guile 2.2 [1]
and it turns out to be incompatible with the core of openLilyLib.
Here are the error messages I got—it may be that only the first is relevant:
%%
https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/issues/62
On 18/01/2022 20:43, Simon Albrecht wrote:
I have started using the experimental 2.23.5 build with Guile 2.2 [1]
and it turns out to be incompatible with the core of openLilyLib.
Here are the error messages I got—it may be that only the first
Hi everyone,
I wanted to set up some customisable headings using #(string-upcase
"string"), but it doesn’t work on German umlauts, so I came upon
string-locale-upcase on this page:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-2.2/guile-ref/Character-Case-Mapping.html#Character-Case-Mapping
Hi everyone,
I have had a very weird error pop up, which doesn’t appear to be related
to a specific LilyPond version, nor was it triggered by any recent
update to OLL (though I’m using chordmode very rarely):
In the following snippet,after loading the core package loader from
Dear Jean,
amazing, thanks a lot!
Best, Simon
On 03/12/2021 14:03, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Please find attached an updated version.
Dear list,
I’ve just upgraded to 2.23.5 from 2.23.3 and when I now use the attached
library file, I get this error message in my log:
Interpreting music... fatal error: meta.classes must be non-empty list,
found #f Exited with return code 1.
Can someone help with fixing it?
Thanks in
Hi Martín,
On 24.10.20 11:47, Martín Rincón Botero wrote:
I wish Perol-Schneider's clef could be considered for inclusion into
standard Lilypond, possibly named as "G2" (which would actually
produce a "second" G clef) or as \clef varG.
two things here: there has been a lot of work to making
There’s no such thing as retracting an e-mail, but I would like to do it.
Sorry for failing to realise how old the thread was before replying.
Best, Simon
On 10.10.20 14:11, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Dear Karsten and list,
On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all
Dear Karsten and list,
On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if not
silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by Lilypond
are never affected by the strong copyleft effect of the GPL. That's
good to hear. But I
On 16.07.20 23:27, Urs Liska wrote:
I could not reproduce this with 2.21.3, which I just downloaded. Could
you please try that too? If it's something that was present from 2.21.0
to 2.21.2 but not now anymore I wouldn't bother investigating more
closely.
Of course. And indeed, neither 2.20.0
Hi Urs et al.,
On 15.07.20 08:15, Urs Liska wrote:
MWE please, and the error message.
This one is very minimal :-)
\version "2.21.0" \include "oll-core/package.ily"
=>
Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Untitled]... Processing
Hello everybody,
apologies if the question is redundant—I haven’t been able to follow the
lists recently.
With 2.21.0, I have GUILE throwing an error message for
oll-core/package.ily:57 that doesn’t appear with 2.19.84.
Is that a known problem? Should I try isolating it?
Best, Simon
On 18.04.20 09:05, Urs Liska wrote:
Which gets back to my question: how did you invoke it, do you run LilyPond from
Frescobaldi?
Yes, and somehow when adding 2.20.0 and 2.21.0 to the ‘Preferences >
LilyPond preferences’ dialogue I went down to the lilypond/usr/bin/
subdirectory instead of
On 18.04.20 09:01, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
To address the original problem you should invoke lilypond via the
wrapper script /usr/local/lilypond-2.21.0/bin/lilypond
instead of using the the directly binary from
/usr/local/lilypond-2.21.0/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond.
Thanks, Jonas, for the
On 16.04.20 20:15, Timothy Lanfear wrote:
On my machine
/usr/local/lilypond-2.21.0/lilypond/usr/bin/gs --version returns 9.26,
conflicting with
/usr/local/lilypond-2.21.0/lilypond/usr/share/ghostscript/9.21
I hadn't noticed because I run my distribution's gs not Lilypond's. A
packaging
On 16.04.20 18:09, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
On 4/16/20 2:46 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello everyone,
I’m having a problem with my newly installed Lilypond versions 2.20.0
and 2.21.0: Any compilation I start aborts while GS tries writing a PDF.
I installed both versions yesterday
Hello everyone,
I’m having a problem with my newly installed Lilypond versions 2.20.0
and 2.21.0: Any compilation I start aborts while GS tries writing a PDF.
I installed both versions yesterday, and the first tests were
successful, before this problem came up. Inbetween I mounted and
Let's be honest, they really had to get their stuff together to keep any ground
all against Dorico.
Best, Simon
> On 27.03.2020 - 15:26, Shane Brandes wrote:
>
>
> They are really on the ball on that one.
>
>
> -Shane
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:09 AM Valentin Villenave
> wrote:
>
Hi Urs,
this looks great! As often, I can’t offer much more than applause and
some nitpicking…
On the ‘About LilyPond’ I’d rather write “GNU LilyPond is a music
notation program /strongly inspired by/ traditional craftsmanship”.
After all, the process of working with LilyPond doesn’t
On 21.01.20 22:05, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
I’m pretty sure I would have taken quite a while to find my way to
"make-simple-markup"
Note that
(make-simple-markup "foo")
is equivalent to
(markup #:simple "foo")
in other words it’s the spelled-out version of what’s usually accessed
through
On 14.01.20 18:15, Arle Lommel wrote:
Why Bartók didn’t simply show the bottom D in the treble clef is an
interesting question. I think he was trying to keep the relationship
between the hands clear, but couldn’t quite include the upper D in a
way that made sense without splitting it like
Hi Paolo,
it seems like you have some very specific setup of lilypond files and
framework and need a solution that works within that, but you’re trying
to avoid explaining the whole setup either because it’s too much effort
or for privacy or similar. From my experience, when I get into that
Hi Paolo,
On 05.01.20 23:32, Paolo Prete wrote:
https://github.com/paolo-prete/LilyJSSVG/blob/master/LilyJSSVG.ogv
it seems like github can’t display the video—even the ‘raw’ option shows
a zero-length video.
Best, Simon
On 03.01.20 14:25, Wols Lists wrote:
On 29/12/19 04:30, Simon Albrecht wrote:
thanks for the reply. I have learned from painful experience that it
seems better to just reinstall the OS completely, avoiding any issues
with the upgrade, and restore user data from backup. I have made all
On 02.01.20 13:19, Peter Gentry wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:31:10 -0700 (MST)
From: Michael Rivers
The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). I
uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works
fine.
Hi Mark,
another low-maintenance solution would be:
<<
{ %{ notes for top voice %} }
\\
{ %{ notes for bottom voice %} }
\\ \\ % NB!
{ %{ notes for middle voice %} }
>>
Best, Simon
On 31.12.19 07:09, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello to All
Please provide some
On 30.12.19 18:11, Ralf Mattes wrote:
The most sensible explanation for that would be an error in the bash
file, so I attach it in case someone else can see one…
Where did you get this shell script from?
I tried to assemble it from the ‘echo’ calls in
Hello everybody,
after upgrading to Ubuntu 18.04 I freshly installed Frescobaldi (and
python-ly) according to the guide in the wiki (except for writing the
~/bin/frescobaldi within gedit, because somehow the first echo line
wouldn’t work… and I cloned both repos from github.com/frescobaldi/…
On 28.12.19 20:00, ma...@masonhock.com wrote:
On 12/28, Simon Albrecht wrote:
I want to spend as little time as possible on maintaining/upgrading
the OS. So I’m reluctant to ditch 16.04 just yet. Should I bite the
bullet and take the time to install 18.04?
18.04 has been out long enough
Hi everybody,
On 28.12.19 09:46, Urs Liska wrote:
Before upgrading to a newer OS it might be an option to use a current
Qt/PyQt downloaded or compiled from somewhere. @Simon you could do us
a huge favor by exploring that possibility and providing information
about it for the Wiki.
This is
On 27.12.19 17:10, Kevin Cole wrote:
If I'm installing on my machine, do I need QtWebEngine? (I can't
find that through Ubuntu Software, either.)
As to the Qt stuff, I find using synaptic ("sudo apt install
synaptic") a bit more helpful than the Ubuntu Software installer.
Slightly
Dear Frescobaldi devs,
that sounds absolutely great and I chime into thanking you a lot for
this great software!
Best, Simon
On 27.12.19 11:20, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Dear Friends,
Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! There are many new features.
Most notably:
- A new Fonts dialog to
1 - 100 of 2034 matches
Mail list logo
