Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On 11/5/2015 12:21 PM, Urs Liska wrote: Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans: On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application but doesn't try to be an IDE? Eh, Emacs? Well, Emacs tries

Re: Sibelius 7 to LilyPond Conversion!

On 10/29/2015 5:28 AM, Richard Shann wrote: This script looks for pairs of same pitch notes connected by a slur and changes them into two tied notes. That one is actually so common (people make the mistake when entering music in Denemo too) that it is available in Denemo as a command. How do

Re: Emacs lilypond-mode and also point-and-click

On 10/15/2015 7:24 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: I’m aware that the emacs lilypond-mode needs attention, but I wonder if anybody has seen this. When I enter a ‘>’ character to complete a chord, emacs goes into narrow mode, which then has to be undone with C-x n w. It’s consistently reproducible.

Re: Emacs lilypond-mode and also point-and-click

On 10/15/2015 10:28 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: With the fi, or workaround, for the narrowing problem, in place, the issue I reported regarding the emacs buffer being messed up (apologies for my lack of technical precision there! The buffer was being truncated to almost half the length in a way

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/7/2015 5:50 AM, Jacques Menu wrote: Is that the kind of things you’re aiming at? http://lilypondblog.org/2013/09/automatic-generation-of-scales-in-various-modes-for-all-21-pitches/ Exactly. Except I'm doing it manually, instead of programmatically, since I think that will

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/5/2015 12:58 PM, Noeck wrote: Hi Michael, Am 05.10.2015 um 11:33 schrieb T. Michael Sommers: Hmmm. When I change from a key with sharps or flats in it to one with no sharps or flats, the cancelling accidentals still appear. I can understand that, since otherwise there would

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/5/2015 2:59 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 05.10.2015 11:33, T. Michael Sommers wrote: Hmmm. When I change from a key with sharps or flats in it to one with no sharps or flats, the cancelling accidentals still appear. I can understand that, since otherwise there would be no indication

Two questions about key signatures

I have a couple of questions about key signatures: 1) When a key change occurs at the end of a printed line, the new key signature is printed at the end of the line. Is there any way to suppress that? 2) When the key changes, the new key signature includes a bunch of naturals to negate the

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/5/2015 3:33 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote: On 5 Oct 2015, at 09:16, T. Michael Sommers <tmsomme...@gmail.com <mailto:tmsomme...@gmail.com>> wrote: I have a couple of questions about key signatures: 1) When a key change occurs at the end of a printed line, the new key signatur

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/5/2015 3:42 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote: Actually, so save you some time finding the relevant passages, your ... Q2 in section "Visibility of cancelling accidentals". Thanks. I hadn't seen that while searching the manual. -- T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/5/2015 5:13 AM, T. Michael Sommers wrote: On 10/5/2015 3:42 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote: Actually, so save you some time finding the relevant passages, your ... Q2 in section "Visibility of cancelling accidentals". Thanks. I hadn't seen that while searching the manual. Hmm

Re: Two questions about key signatures

On 10/5/2015 5:33 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote: I tried this: \override Staff.KeySignature.break-visibility = ##(#f #t #t) along with some variations, but it didn't seem to have any effect. Also, I had used that formula in another situation (with the TimeSignature, I think), and, although it

Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off

On 9/26/2015 3:31 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: The output is normal and correct. What may be putting you off is that with the default fonts, under 2.19.27 at least, the numerals are aligned slightly to the left of the barline, perhaps giving the impression they belong to the bar before. That is

Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off

On 9/26/2015 1:53 AM, David Kastrup wrote: "T. Michael Sommers" <tmsomme...@gmail.com> writes: It seems that unless I put a \set Score.currentBarNumber = #0 at the top of a score, the bar numbers that get printed are one higher than they should be. For instance, this

Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off

On 9/26/2015 3:41 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: Well, to align the numbers more inside the bar they relate to, add: \override Score.BarNumber.self-alignment-X = #-1 Thanks. -- T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off

On 9/26/2015 3:54 AM, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, Andrew Bernard wrote: The output is normal and correct. What may be putting you off is that with the default fonts, under 2.19.27 at least, the numerals are aligned slightly to the left of the barline, perhaps giving the

Re: Bar numbers seem to be one off

On 9/26/2015 3:41 AM, bobr...@centrum.is wrote: I think maybe you did not understand clearly what David Kastrup said. When counting bar numbers, incomplete bars at the beginning are *not* counted. No, I understand. The posted example is just part of a larger score. The rests are there

Bar numbers seem to be one off

It seems that unless I put a \set Score.currentBarNumber = #0 at the top of a score, the bar numbers that get printed are one higher than they should be. For instance, this, with the above line commented out, labels the first bar "2". What am I missing? - snip - \version

Re: Multiple scores in a single document

On 9/25/2015 2:44 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: In particular, read about the setting print-all-headers! See also http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=310. There is no need to redefine the titling commands! I swear I tried that before and it gave an error message. Now it works in my test file,

Re: Multiple scores in a single document

On 9/22/2015 2:06 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 22.09.2015 19:53, T. Michael Sommers wrote: Is it possible to have multiple independent scores in a single document, Of course it’s possible: just use more than one \score {} block. with each score having its own title, composer, arranger

Re: Multiple scores in a single document

On 9/24/2015 9:15 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: 2015-09-25 2:46 GMT+02:00 T. Michael Sommers <tmsomme...@gmail.com>: On 9/22/2015 2:06 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 22.09.2015 19:53, T. Michael Sommers wrote: Is it possible to have multiple independent scores in a single document, Of

Multiple scores in a single document

Is it possible to have multiple independent scores in a single document, with each score having its own title, composer, arranger, and so forth? From what I can see, if a score has those items in its header, they are ignored. Thanks. -- T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb