Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Eluze wrote you can define the spanner in its own (dynamic) context and move it wherever you want: thanks for the answer. I am aware of the possibility to have the dynamics in a separate voice - and it might be the solution here. I am however not fond of having to enter dynamics in a voice

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Simon Bailey-5 wrote this is untested, but what might work would be to set up your score with a Dynamics context at the top. Don't be mislead by it being called Dynamics, you can put ANYTHING in there, doesn't have to be Dynamics (I use one for putting pedal markings in piano staves for

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Simon Bailey-5 wrote If I add the music from the topmost staff to a separate dynamics context (placed above that staff), will dynamics context then be printed twice? yes, that's correct. the music is suppressed, but the dynamics will be shown. this is why i suggested using a global structure

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
jensgc wrote The reason I don't like the idea of a global structure definition is that I have the individual parts (e.g. the quartet and the choir parts) defined in seperate files to be able to test and work with them independently. Having the \time and \key definitions in a part

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Trevor Daniels wrote ? \tempo ritardando Not a bad idea - but I would then have to abandon the idea of the normal rit. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ al construct where the text spans the entire duration of the ritardando. Think I'll try a feature request for a SystemSpanner - and perhaps a

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Kieren MacMillan wrote In regards to tempo markings, it is a different matter, since any change in tempo needs to apply to each and every voice in the system. It makes perfect sense that the \tempo marking always goes to the System - I just don't understand why it is much more difficult to

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Kieren MacMillan wrote Having just engraved 25 minutes of large forces music for voices and instruments (57 staves, for ~330 performers!), I **HIGHLY** recommend you avoid doing things like that in future scores. Thanks for the advice. I'm only on my 4th real score in Lilypond so I'll take all

Re: (no subject)

2014-01-15 Thread jensgc
Simon Bailey-5 wrote have you seen: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music ? Excellent! Highly useful - although it is a bit annoying to see a large bunch of warnings when the showLastLength is set. -- View this message in context: