> On Jan 18, 2016, at 1:44 AM, Carl-Henrik Buschmann
> wrote:
>
>
>> 18. jan. 2016 kl. 02.40 skrev tim...@bitstream.net:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 17, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Carl-Henrik Buschmann
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> While i might agree with you to some extent
> On Jan 17, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Carl-Henrik Buschmann
> wrote:
>
> While i might agree with you to some extent this is also a practial matter:
>
> 1) Whether or not you call it maj or *triangle*, m or MI is indeed a matter
> of culture and personal taste. But consider
> On Jan 17, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>> that is a matter of individual preferences.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> Cmaj7#4 is less trouble to read than Cmaj7(#4) on the bandstand in an
>> unfamiliar tune.
>
> Disagreed.
>
>> 90% of the
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:15 AM, tim...@bitstream.net wrote:
>> Given an Am(sus) chord on a chart I would wonder whether the composer wants
>> a suspended chord (A D E) or a triad with a 4th-
> On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>> Sus chords do not resolve to a diatonic major or minor in quartal harmony
>> for example, so for Lilypond to assume there is a resolution to a major or
>> minor triad would be unwise.
>