--- On Thu, 10/8/09, David Nalesnik dnale...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
From: David Nalesnik dnale...@umail.iu.edu
Subject: Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 2:55 AM
Hi Jonathan,
I like
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:53 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On Saturday 30 May 2009 10:23:31 pm Werner LEMBERG wrote:
shortest note playing here.)
(shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? The duration of the
shortest note that starts here.)
+ (hide-tied-accidental-after-break
Hi,
According to Gardner Read: It is not necessary to repeat the accidental
before a tied note . . . The one exception to this general rule occurs when
the note or notes affected by the accidental and tied over the barline come
at the end of a system or at the bottom of the page. It is helpful to
--- On Sat, 10/3/09, David Nalesnik dnale...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
From: David Nalesnik dnale...@umail.iu.edu
Subject: Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break
To: Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com
Cc: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, lilypond-user
lilypond-user
On Saturday 30 May 2009 10:23:31 pm Werner LEMBERG wrote:
shortest note playing here.)
(shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? The duration of the
shortest note that starts here.)
+ (hide-tied-accidental-after-break ,boolean? If set, an accidental
+that appears on a tied note
Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
p.s. Despite [As a result of?] banging my head against this
particular wall, I think I learned a little about Scheme +
Lilypond... that's some consolation! =)
If it's any additional consolation, your approach would have been
perfectly ok were
Hi all (esp. Valentin):
Last month, there was a quick exchange about hiding accidental(s) on
tied note(s) after a line break:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/
msg00949.html
I am running into the same issue right now, and I see why others have
been frustrated by
Hi all,
Earlier (on -user), I wrote:
Last month, there was a quick exchange about hiding accidental(s)
on tied note(s) after a line break:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/
msg00949.html
I am running into the same issue right now, and I see why others
have been
The saga continues... =)
I've hacked the Tie callback to try to adjust the Accidental
property. Coloring the Accidental works fine:
%
\version 2.12.2
#(define (tie-callback tiegrob)
(let* (
; have we been split?
(orig (ly:grob-original tiegrob))
; if yes, get the
On Saturday 30 May 2009 07:41:51 pm Kieren MacMillan wrote:
The saga continues... =)
I've hacked the Tie callback to try to adjust the Accidental
property. Coloring the Accidental works fine:
%
\version 2.12.2
#(define (tie-callback tiegrob)
(let* (
; have we been
Hi Joe,
Not really
=\
the code that places a tied accidental after a line break isn't
accessible from scheme (it lives in lily/accidental.cc, in the
print function).
Ah...
here's a patch (to be applied with git am) that implements a new
property, 'hide-tied-accidental-after-break, in
On Saturday 30 May 2009 08:10:46 pm Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Joe,
Not really
=\
the code that places a tied accidental after a line break isn't
accessible from scheme (it lives in lily/accidental.cc, in the
print function).
Ah...
here's a patch (to be applied with git am) that
shortest note playing here.)
(shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? The duration of the
shortest note that starts here.)
+ (hide-tied-accidental-after-break ,boolean? If set, an accidental
+that appears on a tied note after a line break will not be displayed)
(side-axis
13 matches
Mail list logo
