\shape question

Hi all, just a quick (and urgent) question: \shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) should be correct syntax? Or am I blind? At least LilyPond 2.17.16 hits me error: wrong type for argument 2. Expecting symbol list or music, found ((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) \shape Slur

Re: \shape question

Hi Urs, the order of the arguments changed in 2.17: \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) Slur should work. The second argument now also may be music, so that you can use in a tweak fashion: c-\shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) ( d) HTH best, Jan-Peter Am 24.04.2013 10:57, schrieb

Re: \shape question

Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Hi all, just a quick (and urgent) question: \shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) should be correct syntax? Or am I blind? At least LilyPond 2.17.16 hits me error: wrong type for argument 2. Expecting symbol list or music, found ((0 . 0)

Re: \shape question

Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2013, 11:05 +0200 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Hi Urs, the order of the arguments changed in 2.17: \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) Slur should work. The second argument now also may be music, so that you can use in a tweak fashion: c-\shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 .

Re: \shape question

Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2013, 11:05 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Hi all, just a quick (and urgent) question: \shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) should be correct syntax? Or am I blind? At least LilyPond 2.17.16 hits me

Re: \shape question

Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2013, 11:05 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Hi all, just a quick (and urgent) question: \shape Slur #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) should be correct syntax? Or am I blind? At