Hi Jeffrey and Ben,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:13 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree - you have done an amazing job with this, thank you so much!
Ben
Jeffrey Trevino wrote
Hi David,
I really hope this ends up in Lilypond; you've clearly put a ton of work
-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p139671.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi David,
I really hope this ends up in Lilypond; you've clearly put a ton of work
into this. And it's even commented now! Brilliant.
It seems to be working just fine; I'll holler if there are troubles.
cheers,
Jeff
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, David Nalesnik
Hi David,
I just saw this fix. Thanks for spending so much time tweaking this. Maybe
there's a way it can be integrated into the Lilypond code, since you've
spent so much time developing it. I'll be using it in a score soon.
cheers,
Jeff
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:04 PM, David Nalesnik
Hi Jeff,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I just saw this fix. Thanks for spending so much time tweaking this. Maybe
there's a way it can be integrated into the Lilypond code, since you've
spent so much time developing it. I'll
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:30 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
The behavior is undefined if I remember correctly: an error is not
guaranteed by the standard. I think Guilev2 will produce an error, but
LilyPond is still at Guilev1.
OK, thanks!
-David
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Trying to work out the problem, I've done a little rewriting so I'll
include the engraver here. You can just substitute this in the
problematic file.
Well, I did break something. Here's the fix:
David,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:34 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
It turns out that the my definition of event-drul as '(() . ()) was
the problem. I substituted (cons '() '()) and everything works just
fine...even with the file that
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
(I'm trying an example given here:
http://jayreynoldsfreeman.com/Aux/Tutorials/Modifying%20Lists.html)
I don't understand this--because clearly using set-car! and set-cdr!
with a constant led to problems within the engraver; why will the
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm copying this to the list since I myself am not sure about something here.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for revising this more for me. I really appreciate your efforts, and
I will take a look at this asap
Hi again,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm copying this to the list since I myself am not sure about something here.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for
Hi Jeffrey,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Could someone please take a look at the latest scheme code in this thread
and figure out how we can use this frame engraver construct on multiple
staffs in the same score simultaneously?
Hi all,
Could someone please take a look at the latest scheme code in this thread
and figure out how we can use this frame engraver construct on multiple
staffs in the same score simultaneously? It's pretty important for
preceding in my work, and I can't figure out how to get it working.
thank
Hi Jeffrey,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Yes, I think it's reasonable to confine the frame to a single line, even
though the arrow must be breakable.
I'm also having problems using the construct on parallel staffs within a
Hi there,
The box construct from this thread is working fine on my machine, but I'd
like to know how to add one important feature to it: It's currently the
case that the arrow isn't breakable, i. e. if the box's entire duration
exceeds the graphic space of the first line, the arrow stops on the
Hi Jeffrey,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
The box construct from this thread is working fine on my machine, but I'd
like to know how to add one important feature to it: It's currently the case
that the arrow isn't breakable, i.
Hi David,
Yes, I think it's reasonable to confine the frame to a single line, even
though the arrow must be breakable.
I'm also having problems using the construct on parallel staffs within a
score. It works fine for a single staff, but when I try to use the same
construct on two staffs
Hi Jeffrey,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
This is a very help description. Maybe you could describe for me: I see both
the box duration as a spacer duration and the line duration as extender
length, in what seem to be unitless
mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136369.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Whoa --
It's marvelous to see such a detailed response to my question.
Most importantly, frameEngraver4 works! I will study the differences
between 3 and 4 to see what changed.
As mentioned, it seems to me that the best course of action would be to
make dynamic spanner creation a high
://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136361.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:46 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to wrap my head around the frameEngraver4 and can't quite grasp
the syntax and how to customize the code to suit my needs.
Is there a guide or cheat-sheet that explains how to use
Hi David,
This is a very help description. Maybe you could describe for me: I see
both the box duration as a spacer duration and the line duration as
extender length, in what seem to be unitless units.
Here is an addition -- although I'm not sure if it's an improvement -- that
might be important
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:25 AM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll keep you posted for sure. Say, do you suppose that this boxed notation
utility could be implemented sooner (and perhaps with more powerful
features) in LilyPond if funding/support increased?
Well, i think
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136304
Hi,
you seem to use some very strange quotation style. Please use regular
quotation style (i.e. your text without marks, each quotation level
has one more).
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Janek Warchoł-2 wrote
- contributing to Lily
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136312.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
you seem to use some very strange quotation style. Please use regular
quotation style (i.e. your text without marks, each quotation level
has one more).
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:44 PM, SoundsFromSound
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
- you can pay one of the experienced developers to implement
specifically this feature. But that would probably be expensive, as
programming work is expensive in general. You'll probably need to
find several other people willing to pay for
Ben,
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
David:
I see, thanks for clarifying that for me. So, in your opinion, if I wanted
to use these aleatoric boxes on a few scores here and there, that would be
doable - though not ideal, it would /work/-
mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136229.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Ben,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
Thanks for the feedback! It's sad to hear that boxed notation is a bit
challenging in LilyPond (i.e. not possible without breaking parts of it) -
do you think there will ever be a native, more
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136248.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive
Hi Jeffrey,
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:42 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jeffrey Trevino jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the frameEngraver3.ly code from this aleatoric
notation thread going on Lilypond 2.16.0-1, and I get the following
errors:
GNU
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:42 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
That regression test tampered with internals of LilyPond in a manner
that broke session integrity (any changes propagated to further files
processed on the command line). It likely still does. The internals
changed in the
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136168.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136170.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Ben,
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:00 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I'm a little confused. What problems was David talking about, I didn't
follow. So we shouldn't use this boxed notation approach, or we should but
with caveats?
As I understand it, the
mailing list
lilypond-user@
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136172.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com writes:
Hi David,
I'm a little confused. What problems was David talking about, I didn't
follow. So we shouldn't use this boxed notation approach, or we should but
with caveats?
One shouldn't
a) tamper with internals
b) expect the tampering to
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the frameEngraver3.ly code from this aleatoric notation
thread going on Lilypond 2.16.0-1, and I get the following errors:
GNU LilyPond 2.16.0
Processing `frameEngraver.ly'
Parsing...
frameEngraver.ly:27:1: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning
=
#12
...etc
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136120.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing
Jeffrey Trevino jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the frameEngraver3.ly code from this aleatoric
notation thread going on Lilypond 2.16.0-1, and I get the following
errors:
GNU LilyPond 2.16.0
Processing `frameEngraver.ly'
Parsing...
frameEngraver.ly:27:1:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Mike,
Excellent work!
I'm glad you think so!
I've attached a new file that addresses some of the issues you
identify above:
--) It uses axis-group::width to box accidentals
Beautiful! Now there's
Hi developers,
On 2012.03.13., at 17:33, David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Mike,
Excellent work!
I'm glad you think so!
I've attached a new file that addresses some of the issues you identify
above:
--) It uses axis-group::width to box accidentals
Beautiful! Now there's really
Hi Ádám,
I tried to use the frame engraver of this thread, but I was unable to do
so. I'm constantly getting 'syntax error, unexpected EVENT_IDENTIFIER'
errors and the LilyPond compiler won't recognize the \frameStart and
\frameEnd commands. The only thing I changed was the version number
Hi David,
On 2012.03.26., at 23:05, David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Ádám,
I tried to use the frame engraver of this thread, but I was unable to do
so. I'm constantly getting 'syntax error, unexpected EVENT_IDENTIFIER'
errors and the LilyPond compiler won't recognize the \frameStart and
Hi James,
BTW, I didn't mention before, but it looks like I'm going to be using that
feathered-beam function, derived from work by David, and this box-notation
function, also coming from David's work.
Oh, I just helped out a bit with that one--thanks definitely go to Harm.
So David -- I
At Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:33:30 -0500,
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Mike,
Excellent work!
I'm glad you think so!
BTW, I didn't mention before, but it looks like I'm going to be using that
feathered-beam function, derived from work by David, and this box-notation
function, also coming from
On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:25 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
I've defined a grob, Frame, and given it several properties. One of these,
'padding, adds space between the frame and its contents, as you would expect.
The length of the continuation line is controlled by the property
'extender-length.
Hi Mike,
Excellent work!
I'm glad you think so!
I've attached a new file that addresses some of the issues you identify
above:
--) It uses axis-group::width to box accidentals
Beautiful! Now there's really no need for the extra padding properties.
(I've kept them in the attached
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:18 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 8:53 AM, James Harkins wrote:
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:12:35 +0100,
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The best way to achieve that with current LilyPond is Scheme engravers.
There
On 3/11/12 12:53 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote:
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:12:35 +0100,
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The best way to achieve that with current LilyPond is Scheme engravers.
There have been a few examples of Scheme engravers posted on this list
(if you search Scheme
On Mar 11, 2012, at 5:33 AM, James Harkins wrote:
Possibly a common question, sorry if asked and answered before, but Google
failed me...
I'm considering some aleatoric notation (so-called box notation) for a
piece but couldn't find info in the manuals (the contemporary notation
section
On Mar 11, 2012, at 8:53 AM, James Harkins wrote:
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:12:35 +0100,
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The best way to achieve that with current LilyPond is Scheme engravers.
There have been a few examples of Scheme engravers posted on this list (if
you search Scheme engraver
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:40:19 +,
Carl Sorensen wrote:
You might offer a bounty to Mike or to David Kastrup, in which case they
would write the custom engraver for you.
Thinking about that... either monetary or a delivery from a microbrewery? :-p
This might be viable in the meantime. I
Possibly a common question, sorry if asked and answered before, but Google
failed me...
I'm considering some aleatoric notation (so-called box notation) for a piece
but couldn't find info in the manuals (the contemporary notation section of
the 2.14.2 docs @ lilypond.org is empty), or in the
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:12:35 +0100,
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The best way to achieve that with current LilyPond is Scheme engravers.
There have been a few examples of Scheme engravers posted on this list (if
you search Scheme engraver you'll find one - there are also examples in the
58 matches
Mail list logo
