Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Am 30.04.2018 um 12:28 schrieb David Kastrup: which can be achieved by using ‘_’ instead of a number. That's what I wanted to propose, but it didn't produce what I hoped for: \figures { < 5 4 > < _ 3+> } Oh. Ok. Sorry for the noise. I made this work for me by inserting at line 206 of

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Am 30.04.2018 um 12:28 schrieb David Kastrup: which can be achieved by using ‘_’ instead of a number. That's what I wanted to propose, but it didn't produce what I hoped for: \figures { < 5 4 > < _ 3+> } Oh. Ok. Sorry for the noise. I made this work for me by inserting at line 206 of

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Hi Harm, Thank you for this enormous collection of possibilities and code for displaying BC-figures. I may not live long enough to put all of it in practice but for my present purpose it is more than sufficient. On the topic of Figured Bass in LilyPond I still have some other desires, to be

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

2018-04-30 12:51 GMT+02:00 Torsten Hämmerle : > Hi Robert, > > How about simply flipping the stacking direction? > >\override BassFigureAlignment.stacking-dir = #UP > > That way, the bass figures will be piled up from bottom to top. > Caveat: the first figure entered

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Hi Torsten, A nice alternative method, one that requires some extra concentration but works well. Thank you very much. Best regards, Robert On 30 Apr 2018, at 12:51 , Torsten Hämmerle wrote: > Hi Robert, > > How about simply flipping the stacking direction? > >

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Hi Robert, How about simply flipping the stacking direction? \override BassFigureAlignment.stacking-dir = #UP That way, the bass figures will be piled up from bottom to top. Caveat: the first figure entered will be the lowest. << { 4 4 4 4 4 4 } \figures { \override

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Noeck writes: >> which can be achieved by using ‘_’ instead of a number. > > That's what I wanted to propose, but it didn't produce what I hoped for: > > \figures { < 5 4 > < _ 3+> } Oh. Ok. Sorry for the noise. -- David Kastrup

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

> which can be achieved by using ‘_’ instead of a number. That's what I wanted to propose, but it didn't produce what I hoped for: \figures { < 5 4 > < _ 3+> } Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Hi David, Thanks for your reaction. You write "So blanking entries is done by entering _ instead of a number." I'm not sure I fully understand this. I have tried to get a number, for instance #3 on the second row by entering < _ 3+ >, but that didn't change anything; the #3 stayed on the top

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Hi Malte, Many thanks. It is what I needed. (I think it should be in the Snippet-collection.) Best regards, Robert On 30 Apr 2018, at 11:03 , Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Robert Blackstone: >> Dear all, >> In the Lilypond documentation it

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Robert Blackstone writes: > Dear all, > > In the Lilypond documentation it is shown how to stack BC figures, but I have > not > been able to find how to put a figure in the second row with nothing above it. > In my score I get: > * > but what I need is: > > * > > I

Re: Another Figured Bass problem

Am 30.04.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Robert Blackstone: Dear all, In the Lilypond documentation it is shown how to stack BC figures, but I have not been able to find how to put a figure in the second row with nothing above it. In my score I get: but what I need is: I got this result by

Another Figured Bass problem

Dear all, In the Lilypond documentation it is shown how to stack BC figures, but I have not been able to find how to put a figure in the second row with nothing above it. In my score I get: but what I need is: I got this result by entering \ before the number, like < \ 3+ >, and erasing