Thanks, Nute. You are right, I should have said what I did. I actually tried
the link that Robin send:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/rhythms_003a-using-ties-with-arpeggios
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
\grace {fs,,4~^\pp\sustainOn cs'~ as'^~ s4*3} 1
> El 26 abr. 2024, a
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 7:07 AM Robert Garrigos wrote:
> How about moving the grace notes of the lower staff to the left? I’m
> trying with GraceSpacing but cannot make it work just for the lower staff.
> It is applied to the Score, not the Staff.
>
It's nice to show what you have tried, so
;> I don’t find a way to do this kind of explicit arpeggio (piano):
>
> This is covered at
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/rhythms_003a-using-ties-with-arpeggios
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Robin
Oh thanks. I knew it was somewhere, but couldn't find it.
Robert
On 26 d’abr. de 2024, 13:33, at 13:33, Robin Bannister wrote:
> Robert Garrigos wrote:
>
>>
>> I don’t find a way to do this kind of explicit arpeggio (piano):
>>
>>
>
>This is covere
Robert Garrigos wrote:
I don’t find a way to do this kind of explicit arpeggio (piano):
This is covered at
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/rhythms_003a-using-ties-with-arpeggios
Cheers,
Robin
Dear list,
I don’t find a way to do this kind of explicit arpeggio (piano):
Any clues would be much appreciated.
Robert
Am Sa., 3. Dez. 2022 um 16:35 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Le 03/12/2022 à 15:58, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > Ofcourse. Though, it's another thing a (probably new) user has to
> > learn, maybe scaring him/her away.
>
>
> For someone coming from a language like Haskell, Rust,
> OCaml or now
Le 03/12/2022 à 15:58, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Ofcourse. Though, it's another thing a (probably new) user has to
learn, maybe scaring him/her away.
For someone coming from a language like Haskell, Rust,
OCaml or now even Python, pattern matching will feel
already familiar.
Someone new to
Am Sa., 3. Dez. 2022 um 13:41 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Le 02/12/2022 à 23:47, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > I know you like pattern matching, though imho it makes things not
> > always easier for users.
>
>
>
> Yes, I like pattern matching. No, I'm not going to stop using it :-)
I don't
Le 02/12/2022 à 23:47, Thomas Morley a écrit :
I know you like pattern matching, though imho it makes things not
always easier for users.
Yes, I like pattern matching. No, I'm not going to stop using it :-)
Sure, you have to learn it, like every construct, but it improves
code clarity IMHO
Hi Harm, hi Jean,
Le ven. 2 déc. 2022 à 23:49, Thomas Morley a
écrit :
...
> Even for me - I don't understand that (x x)-line:
>
...
+1, thanks for asking!
Cheers,
Pierre
Am Fr., 2. Dez. 2022 um 11:46 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Le 02/12/2022 à 05:16, Abraham Lee a écrit :
> > Code works perfectly, Jean, though what it's doing is a bit of a
> > mystery. You've been very kind to provide a solution and I don't want
> > to take more of your time on the subject,
Le 02/12/2022 à 05:16, Abraham Lee a écrit :
Code works perfectly, Jean, though what it's doing is a bit of a
mystery. You've been very kind to provide a solution and I don't want
to take more of your time on the subject, but is there some
documentation somewhere that explains that commands
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 8:53 AM Abraham Lee
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:13 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>> Le 01/12/2022 à 10:09, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>> > Ofcourse you're right advertising not to use after-line-breaking for
>> > all and everything.
>> > Though, I do understand why
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:49 AM Mark Knoop wrote:
>
> At 23:08 on 30 Nov 2022, Abraham Lee wrote:
> > Happy Holidays!
>
> > A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend
> > the top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:13 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 01/12/2022 à 10:09, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > Ofcourse you're right advertising not to use after-line-breaking for
> > all and everything.
> > Though, I do understand why it's still in use.
>
>
>
> Yes, sure. My point was to advise
Le 01/12/2022 à 10:09, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Ofcourse you're right advertising not to use after-line-breaking for
all and everything.
Though, I do understand why it's still in use.
Yes, sure. My point was to advise against it, not to rebuke people who
have used / are using it.
Indeed,
ne page spacing,
> i.e., layout out systems and staves vertically.
This is not documented afaik.
> For a cross-staff
> arpeggio, the positions depend on the distance between the
> two staves, so you are requesting 'positions earlier than LilyPond
> can provide it to you.
>
> I
At 23:08 on 30 Nov 2022, Abraham Lee wrote:
> Happy Holidays!
> A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend
> the top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more
> aesthetically pleasing (generally), though I know it's not perfect:
Can you
Le 01/12/2022 à 07:08, Abraham Lee a écrit :
Happy Holidays!
A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend
the top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more
aesthetically pleasing (generally), though I know it's not perfect:
\override Arpeggio.after
Happy Holidays!
A number of versions ago, I created the following function to extend the
top and bottom ends of the Arpeggio grob, which I find more aesthetically
pleasing (generally), though I know it's not perfect:
\override Arpeggio.after-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((pos
Thank you!
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:12 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
> > How to engrave this (screenshot attached) 12/8 time (looks like an
> > arpeggio with ties)
>
> Exactly. Look up the Notation Reference Index under 'arpeggio and
> ties'...
>
>
> Werner
> How to engrave this (screenshot attached) 12/8 time (looks like an
> arpeggio with ties)
Exactly. Look up the Notation Reference Index under 'arpeggio and
ties'...
Werner
like to have a grace note arpeggio where each note is
tied to the chord that follows:
\grace{g16~ c~ e~}4
I only get the tie between the e's, not the other notes.
This is similar to a rolled chord, but I want it more articulated, hence
the grace notes. regards, Jim
Before searching
Le 17/07/2022 à 20:00, Jim Cline a écrit :
Hello, sorry if I missed it, but I did not find it by searching the
archives. I would like to have a grace note arpeggio where each note
is tied to the chord that follows:
\grace{g16~ c~ e~}4
I only get the tie between the e's, not the other
Hello, sorry if I missed it, but I did not find it by searching the
archives. I would like to have a grace note arpeggio where each note is
tied to the chord that follows:
\grace{g16~ c~ e~}4
I only get the tie between the e's, not the other notes.
This is similar to a rolled chord, but I
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 10:15 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
...
> It's much simpler to put the arpeggio on the grace note and tweak its
> positions.
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative {
>4
>\grace {
> g'8\tweak positions #'(-4 . -1.5) \tweak extra-s
Le 06/04/2022 à 17:44, Knute Snortum a écrit :
Hi everyone. I have another engraving question.
Without intervention, LilyPond puts a grace note to the left of an
arpeggio mark. I want it to the right, between the arpeggio mark and
the chord notes. Here is a snippet of the default behavior
Hi everyone. I have another engraving question.
Without intervention, LilyPond puts a grace note to the left of an
arpeggio mark. I want it to the right, between the arpeggio mark and
the chord notes. Here is a snippet of the default behavior:
%%%
\version "2.22.2"
\relative {
er
> connectArpeggios = ##t
> % Looks better a bit closer to the notes?
> \override Arpeggio.padding = -0.2
> % A bit of padding to the left?
> \override Arpeggio.extra-spacing-width = #'(-1 . 0)
> }
> <<
> \new Voice \relative {
> \voiceOne
&g
t; Hallo,
>>>>
>>>> I’d like to replace the arpeggioBracket by a curly bracket / brace.
>>>> Thank your for your help!
>>>
>>> Here's a stencil callback reading the vertical start
>>> and end positions of the arpeggio and prin
{
\voiceOne
\override Staff.Arpeggio.stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-bracket
g'\arpeggio
\spanArpeggioBrace
g\arpeggio
g\arpeggio
}
\new Voice \relative {
\clef bass
\voiceTwo
\arpeggio
q\arpeggio
q\arpeggio
}
>>
If you can't get it to work in yo
reading the vertical start
and end positions of the arpeggio and printing a bracket
accordingly:
\version "2.22.1"
arpeggioBrace =
\tweak stencil
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((positions (ly:grob-property grob 'positions))
(layout (ly:grob-layout grob))
(scale (ly:
lback reading the vertical start
> and end positions of the arpeggio and printing a bracket
> accordingly:
>
> \version "2.22.1"
>
> arpeggioBrace =
> \tweak stencil
> #(lambda (grob)
> (let* ((positions (ly:grob-property grob 'positions))
>
Le 19/01/2022 à 09:46, Thomas Scharkowski a écrit :
Hallo,
I’d like to replace the arpeggioBracket by a curly bracket / brace.
Thank your for your help!
Here's a stencil callback reading the vertical start
and end positions of the arpeggio and printing a bracket
accordingly:
\version
Hallo,
I’d like to replace the arpeggioBracket by a curly bracket / brace.
Thank your for your help!
Thomas
replicate this:
>
> [cid:part1.680B3A26.706236F1@gmail.com]
>
> which comes from Faure's famous Impromptu, Op. 86, for harp. I had to use
> \change Staff to get the notated arpeggio beamed as in the Faure, but that
> kills some of the ties. The code below shows what I can do w
All,
I am s close LOL - I'm trying to replicate this:
which comes from Faure's famous Impromptu, Op. 86, for harp. I had to
use \change Staff to get the notated arpeggio beamed as in the Faure,
but that kills some of the ties. The code below shows what I can do with
my present
flexibility.
e.g. I may need a standard arpeggio but also need the customised one
(simultaneously). For horizontal spanners this isn't a big issue since
David Kastrup created a code that adds as many as needed. But for vertical
spanners there aren't many options.
To give a bit more context on why I need
Hi Dimitris,
Am 17.11.21 um 20:50 schrieb Dimitris Marinakis:
I need a generic engraver that works similar to the default arpeggio
one but I don't want to override the arpeggio engraver or any other
default ones in case I need to have multiple events simultaneously.
I'm not sure I understand
/arpeggio. In
LilyPond, the spanner terminology refers to an object that spans several
columns horizontally.
Best,
Jean
the segments. Really
excited with the more active development of Lilypond this past year.
Best,
Dimitris
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 1:37 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> Le 17/11/2021 à 20:50, Dimitris Marinakis a écrit :
> > I need a generic engraver that works similar to the default a
Le 17/11/2021 à 20:50, Dimitris Marinakis a écrit :
I need a generic engraver that works similar to the default arpeggio
one but I don't want to override the arpeggio engraver or any other
default ones in case I need to have multiple events simultaneously.
I saw a similar thread
I need a generic engraver that works similar to the default arpeggio one
but I don't want to override the arpeggio engraver or any other default
ones in case I need to have multiple events simultaneously.
I saw a similar thread with a custom arpeggio stencil that had both up and
down arrows but I
Le 12/10/2021 à 15:33, David Kastrup a écrit :
but I don't even know whether there is a guarantee that
ly:arpeggio::print is happy with the grob being modified after the call
and before the stencil is getting used. Looking at the C++ code, that
appears to be the case. Maybe giving
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>> No. "in some unspecified order":
>>
>> R5RS:
>
> Ah, thanks! I only had the Guile documentation, which is not quite as
> explicit in that respect. (Ok, they mention for let* that _here_ the
> assignments are done from left to right, but ...).
Strictly speaking "in
No. "in some unspecified order":
R5RS:
Ah, thanks! I only had the Guile documentation, which is not quite as
explicit in that respect. (Ok, they mention for let* that _here_ the
assignments are done from left to right, but ...).
Lukas
ramming languages are meant for. But basically the whole idea of
> "putting the system in one state, let it do some work, then let it do
> the same work again in some other state" that this arpeggio approach
> uses seemed to force me to use a quite "imperative" style of
tting the system in one state, let it do some work, then let it do
the same work again in some other state" that this arpeggio approach
uses seemed to force me to use a quite "imperative" style of
programming. But it didn't occur to me that this could be encapsulated
in a let-begin-
gt; (let ((one #f) (two #f) (combined-stencil #f))
> (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'arpeggio-direction UP)
> (set! one (ly:arpeggio::print grob))
> (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'arpeggio-direction DOWN)
> (set! two (ly:arpeggio::print
Hi all,
> It seems we can continue this game of "LilyPond experts explain how to do
> things and I only have to post the resulting, ever simpler examples" for some
> time. :-)
Ha! Looking forward to the inevitable “one-line-of-code” version. ;)
> Harm pointed out in
>
in
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6193#note_701181244 that
it suffices to do:
\version "2.22"
arpeggioUpDown = {
\override Arpeggio.stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(let ((one #f) (two #f) (combined-stencil #f))
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'arpeggio-direction
The problem is that this arpeggio is not taken into account for spacing: The
next note will be too close. I'm not yet sure what would be The Right Way to
change this, as neither X-extent nor extra-spacing-width of the arpeggio seem
to have an effect for spacing to the right. You can tweak
Hi Lukas,
> One could the default arpeggio stencil machinery do its job twice:
Nice! This is exactly the kind of thing I was thinking of…
> The problem is that this arpeggio is not taken into account for spacing: The
> next note will be too close. I'm not yet sure what would be The
The problem (shown in the third example) is that it doesn’t stretch to match
the chord height, like a normal arpeggio does. I don’t have time — and maybe
not even the skill — to do this The Right Way™ right now, but hopefully Someone
Else™ will take it to the goal line.
One could
Hi Jackens,
> I'm trying to find a way to write an arpeggio up and down, like on the
> picture, but no luck so far, the Lilypond manual only deals with one arpeggio
> line cases... Any help would be very appreciated!
Here’s a start:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
% LilyBin
updownArpMarkup
Hi everyone!
I'm trying to find a way to write an arpeggio up and down, like on the
picture, but no luck so far, the Lilypond manual only deals with one
arpeggio line cases... Any help would be very appreciated!
[image: image.png]
Thanks,
J.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_med
What I ended up doing was very similar, although your solution is more tidy.
Thanks,
Ken
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 3:25 AM Jean Louis THIRY wrote:
>
> Not an arpeggio here. This extract looks like a three voices guitar
> arrangement and I suppose the dotted half note being for a laiss
Not an arpeggio here. This extract looks like a three voices guitar arrangement
and I suppose the dotted half note being for a laissez-vibrer effect
I tried to reproduce it :
\version "2.23.2"
\fixed c'
{ \time 4/4
<<
{2. }
\\ {c2 c!2 }
\\ {\once
; >
> > I have an interesting engraving problem I haven't seen before
> > (example png file attached).
> >
> > I understand how to handle the tuplet, the crescendo, the
> > decrescendo and the general polyphony, even the arpeggio.
> >
> > However, the
> On 15 May, 2021, at 7:39 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> I have an interesting engraving problem I haven't seen before
> (example png file attached).
>
> I understand how to handle the tuplet, the crescendo, the
> decrescendo and the general p
Hello;
I have an interesting engraving problem I haven't seen before
(example png file attached).
I understand how to handle the tuplet, the crescendo, the
decrescendo and the general polyphony, even the arpeggio.
However, the arpeggio is based on a half note and a dotted half
note. How
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 at 00:25, Kieren Diment wrote:
>
> I think this should be an obvious thing, but I can't for the life of me
find how to print out chords as individual notes. Can anyone help
illuminate?
>
> Minimal example below.
>
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> \score {
> \relative c'' {
> %
\autoBeamOff ??
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 10 janv. 2021 à 00:25, Kieren Diment a écrit :
> I think this should be an obvious thing, but I can't for the life of me
> find how to print out chords as individual notes. Can anyone help
> illuminate?
>
> Minimal example below.
>
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
I think this should be an obvious thing, but I can't for the life of me
find how to print out chords as individual notes. Can anyone help
illuminate?
Minimal example below.
\version "2.18.2"
\score {
\relative c'' {
% output a chord
\chordmode { c1:m7 } \break
% output the notes
Hi Urs, hi Andrew,
Thank You for Your help. The solution with openlilylib works really great!
Regards
Franz-Rudolf
https://www.kuhnen-musik.de
https://noten.kuhnen-musik.de
http://www.alte-musik-am-mittelrhein.de
I was going to mention that (me being the author). :-) It is a very
flexible function. The effort in setting up openlilylib would be well
rewarded, and there is a lot of other good stuff there as well.
If you want other French ornaments, there has been recent discussion of
how to do that on
Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2020, 22:31 +0200 schrieb Franz-Rudolf Kuhnen:
> Hi,
>
> in his "Six Suittes de Clavessin" Dieupart used a specific sign for
> an
> arpeggio. -> Attachment
> How can I do that with Lilypond?
Here is an includable function for sla
Hi,
in his "Six Suittes de Clavessin" Dieupart used a specific sign for an
arpeggio. -> Attachment
How can I do that with Lilypond?
Thank You in advanced for Your help
Regards
Franz-Rudolf
https://www.kuhnen-musik.de
https://noten.kuhnen-musik.de
Dear Pierre,
Il giorno lun 2 mar 2020 alle ore 06:41 Pierre Perol-Schneider
ha scritto:
> Here's a possible workaround:
thanks for the workaround: I had already manually shifted the bracket
in my score with Arpeggio.extra-offset, since the size was not that
different, but I'll use
= #'(-9.5 . -3)
\once\override PianoStaff.Arpeggio.Y-extent = #'(0 . 0)
c'4\arpeggio
}
\new Staff {
\clef "bass"
b,4\arpeggio
}
>>
\score {
\music
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 17)
}
}
HTH
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 1 mars 2020 à 22:34, Davi
io.stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-bracket
} <<
\new Staff {
\clef "treble"
c'4\arpeggio
}
\new Staff {
\clef "bass"
b,4\arpeggio
}
>>
\score {
\music
}
\score {
\music
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 17)
}
}
Is there any workaround?
Am Mo., 10. Feb. 2020 um 11:00 Uhr schrieb :
>
> Hi all,
>
> is it possible to change the line-thickness of the arpeggio-brackets or do I
> have to recreate this bracket manually if I want to change anything?
>
>
>
>
>
> \vers
Hi all,
is it possible to change the line-thickness of the arpeggio-brackets or do I
have to recreate this bracket manually if I want to change anything?
\version "2.19.83"
\relative c' {
\arpeggioBracket
4\arpe
Hello,
how can I modify the size of the arrow of an \arpeggioArrowUp/Down object?
Thanks
a chord (it has happened to me in other circumstances) you can just
> include it in angle brackets, like 8 .
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \new Staff \with {
> \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
> }
> {
> \set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
> \clef b
er"
}
{
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\clef bass
<<
{ 4 \arpeggio ^\markup \italic "ten." c'!16 b \prall a gis }
\\
{ d8 \arpeggio \ff s s4 }
>>
}
> 1 dec. 2019 kl. 19:05 skrev Mario Bolognani :
>
> Thanks Leo, but \arpeggio is not working with a s
You can include the Span_arpeggio_engraver in the staff you’re writing, set
Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t and write arpeggios in all voices it should
include. See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio
> 1 dec. 2019 kl. 18:25 skrev Ma
How is possible to connect all notes of a chord with \arpeggio?
Many thanks for your suggestions.
or
Mario Bolognani
email: mario.bologn...@gmail.com
www.baroquemusic.it
Thank you Thomas and Robin for the workarounds.
I think the beauty of the non-arpeggio case well worth a misbehaviour here,
if a short workaround is available and works like in this case.
Thanks again.
El sáb., 26 oct. 2019 a las 8:03, Robin Bannister ()
escribió:
> Thomas Morley wr
Thomas Morley wrote:
As a workaround I'd enter an altered invisible Note in the inner Voice.
Another way is to apply
\once \override Arpeggio.extra-spacing-height = #(cons -inf.0 +inf.0)
just before the arpeggioed 8
That corresponds to Valentin's workaround in
.connectArpeggios = ##t
><<
> \new Staff \with { \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver" } \relative c'' {
> \clef treble \time 6/8 b4. 8 \arpeggio r r}
> \new Staff \with { \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver" } {
><<
>\new
\clef treble \time 6/8 b4. 8 \arpeggio r r}
\new Staff \with { \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver" } {
<<
\new Voice { \voiceOne \relative c' {aes4( g8) s4.}}
\new Voice { \voiceTwo \relative c, { \clef bass \time 6/8 f4. 8 \arpeggio \oneVoice r r }}
el 2019-08-14 a las 18:34 Robin Bannister escribió:
> You can override the positions property.
> Try
>
> \new DrumStaff \with {
>\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
>\override Arpeggio.thickness = #2.0
>\override Arpeggio.positions = #(lambda(grob)
> (interval-widen
edes wrote:
I'm very close to what I want, but is there a way to tweak the length of
the brackets?
You can override the positions property.
Try
\new DrumStaff \with {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override Arpeggio.thickness = #2.0
\override Arpeggio.positions =
mn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override Arpeggio.thickness = #2.0
\omit TimeSignature
}
\drummode {
<<
\new DrumVoice \with { \consists "Arpeggio_engraver"
\arpeggioBracket
}
{ \voiceOne
1\arpeggio
}
\new DrumVoice \with { \consis
On 2019-08-13 9:22 pm, edes wrote:
Hello, list.
It seems it's not possible to use \arpeggio in drummode, or am I
missing
something?
The following code doesn't throw any errors but it doesn't show
anything.
\version "2.21.0"
\new DrumStaff
\drummode {
2
\arpeggio
}
If
Hello, list.
It seems it's not possible to use \arpeggio in drummode, or am I missing
something?
The following code doesn't throw any errors but it doesn't show anything.
\version "2.21.0"
\new DrumStaff
\drummode {
2
Hello,
I later discovered that durations other than 16 are required for the doubled
note later in the score (dotted 4th note for example), so I ended up doing
something like this:
GR = #(define-music-function (m p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6)
(ly:music? ly:pitch? ly:pitch? ly:pitch? ly:pitch?
I’m working on a score that has a lot of arpeggios where the first
note of the 6-note group of 16th notes is doubled as a dotted 4th
note. Having a macro/function to turn e.g. the pattern "f16 c a f c
f,” into “<< { f4. } \\ { f16 c a f c f, } >>”, or even more
preferably “<< { f4. } \\ {
Hi,
I’m working on a score that has a lot of arpeggios where the first note of the
6-note group of 16th notes is doubled as a dotted 4th note. Having a
macro/function to turn e.g. the pattern "f16 c a f c f,” into “<< { f4. } \\ {
f16 c a f c f, } >>”, or even more preferably “<< { f4. } \\ {
Andrew,
Thank you very much.
Ming.
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, 7:37:49 a.m. EST, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
HI Ming,
A usage problem. Read the NR section 1.3.3 Expressive Marks as Lines and see
the section Arpeggio. You will immediately see what's wrong.
Andrew
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019
HI Ming,
A usage problem. Read the NR section 1.3.3 Expressive Marks as Lines and
see the section Arpeggio. You will immediately see what's wrong.
Andrew
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:27, MING TSANG wrote:
>
> I coded arpeggio variant and is not working. Am I use them wrongly?
>
&
Dear lilypond user list:
I coded arpeggio variant and is not working. Am I use them wrongly?
Ming
\version "2.19.82"\language "english"right = \fixed c' { \key bf\major \time
4/4 1\arpeggio | 1\arpeggioArrowDown | 1\arpeggioBracket | 1\arpeggioArrowUp | 1\arpeg
Hi,
> this is for moving systems through a page.
> I was talking about moving the staves within a system.
Ah! Well maybe David N. (who generously added the extra-offsets option, at my
request) might be able to do the same for alignment-distances. I’ve copied him
on this response, just in case.
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> Do you know about extra-offsets in this context?
Yes, but this is for moving systems through a page. I was talking about
moving the staves within a system.
For instance:
<<
\new PianoStaff
<<
\new Staff {
\overrideProperty
Hi,
> Not totally related, but much the same problem for me with the
> alignment-distances from "\overrideProperty
> Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details".
> We can only set an absolute number here, would it be possible to make it
> relative to the original number choosen by LP?
Am 08.09.2018 um 22:36 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> \once \offset positions #'(0 . 1) PianoStaff.Arpeggio
Thanks Harm, that's what I wanted to suggest, but I couldn't find the
right syntax ("bad grob property path").
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user
Torsten Hämmerle wrote
> Kieren MacMillan wrote
>> I’m trying to tweak the "length" of an arpeggio (by 1 staff space at the
>> top), and can’t seem to find the correct incantation or doc reference.
>
>
> Hi Kieren,
>
> You can explicitly set an arpe
> \once \offset positions #'(0 . 1) PianoStaff.Arpeggio
That’s definitely the winner for simplicity/clarity:
\version "2.19.80"
upper = {
\time 3/4
2.\arpeggio
\once \offset positions #'(-0.5 . 0.5) PianoStaff.Arpeggio
2.\arpeggio
}
lower = {
\time 3/4
\clef bass
2.\arpe
1 - 100 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
