on 2009-09-30 at 10:12 Carl Sorensen wrote:
There's actually another case that can lead to failure. That is when
the 16th notes come in the 2nd or 4th beat of the measure,
yes, i see. i think this has been reported by valentin more than a year
ago here:
On 9/29/09 7:25 PM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
thank you carl for your answer. i still think that 2.13.4 has some
beaming issues.
We've had a serious discussion about whether eighth note beams should
end on every beat or only on beats 2 and 4.
We came down on the side
thank you carl for your answer. i still think that 2.13.4 has some
beaming issues.
We've had a serious discussion about whether eighth note beams should
end on every beat or only on beats 2 and 4.
We came down on the side of ending eighth note beams on 2 and 4,
because it seemed to fit Stone's
on 2009-09-29 at 22:25 luis jure wrote:
now, 2.13.4 correctly beams every quarter note when 16th notes are
present, **except in one case:** a 16th rest followed by a dotted 8th
(see second bar in the attached image).
attachment: beams-2.13.4.png___
Nick Payne wrote:
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second
example don't seem to match the output. The comment says No
auto-beaming is defined for 12/16, yet the output has the 16th notes
beamed in
On 9/26/09 10:59 PM, Nick Payne njpa...@internode.on.net wrote:
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second example
don't seem to match the output. The comment says No auto-beaming is
defined for
On 9/27/09 6:08 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
Nick Payne wrote:
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second
example don't seem to match the output. The comment says No
on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
2.13.4.
i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very happy to see that the
automatic placing of beams had improved greatly
On 9/27/09 10:23 AM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
2.13.4.
i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second example
don't seem to match the output. The comment says No auto-beaming is
defined for 12/16, yet the output has the 16th notes beamed in four
groups of three.
10 matches
Mail list logo
