Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello Jan! I'm just testing out EE and I've come across the need to adress a noteHead tweak in a note inside a chord. Looking for a solution, I came to this post. Is this implemented? -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Thank you Thomas, that's very helpful! 2018-02-03 12:10 GMT-03:00 Thomas Morley : > 2018-02-03 15:44 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > > Hi Thomas, thank you for your corrections! > > > > If I may ask, where are functions like event-chord-pitches

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

2018-02-03 15:44 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > Hi Thomas, thank you for your corrections! > > If I may ask, where are functions like event-chord-pitches documented? A lot of definitions in .scm-files are not documented. You may try the code attached to

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hi Thomas, thank you for your corrections! If I may ask, where are functions like event-chord-pitches documented? I have only found a list of functions with their name starting with "ly:". I assumed those were named that way to differentiate Lilypond exclusive functions from Scheme's own, but it

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

2018-02-03 3:52 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > After a lot of stumbling around I finally managed to expand Jan-Peters' > function so that it can modify more than one note in a given chord. I > attached it so its available for anyone interested in using it. Hi Stefano,

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Thank you for your help everyone! After a lot of stumbling around I finally managed to expand Jan-Peters' function so that it can modify more than one note in a given chord. I attached it so its available for anyone interested in using it. On the other hand, I too think that the real solution

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hi David (et al.), > I think it would make a whole lot more sense to teach the Edition > Engraver how to mark/identify and tweak single items. +1 At the risk of opening a serious can-o'-worms… I would love for you (David K.) — who has the best Lilypond-fundamentals programming mind I know — to

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Jan-Peter Voigt writes: > Hello Harm, Stéfano, > > I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ... > Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit > the accidental. This one can be used with the EE. > It smells a bit hacky, but it

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Am 02.02.2018 um 17:55 schrieb David Kastrup: Jan-Peter Voigt writes: Hello Harm, Stéfano, I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ... Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit the accidental. This one can be used with

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello Harm, Stéfano, I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ... Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit the accidental. This one can be used with the EE. It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and is extendable for other use

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello Harm, Stéfano, I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ... Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit the accidental. This one can be used with the EE. It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and is extendable for other use

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello Harm, Stéfano, I always underestimate the usability of before/after-line-breaking ... Based on Harms code I scratched a music-function to conditionally omit the accidental. This one can be used with the EE. It smells a bit hacky, but it seems to work and is extendable for other use

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

I'm not sure if EE supports ApplyOutputEvents, but you could try something like this: ⋘ \applyOutput Voice.Accidental #(let ((n 1)) (lambda (grob ctx1 ctx2) (if (= n 0) (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'stencil #f)) (set! n (1- n % Will omit the N-th

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

2018-02-02 3:55 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > @Thomas > I was not aware that it was possible to write a function inside of a > parameter of a grob, and that before-line-breaking and after-line-breaking > served this purpose. The documentation describes them as booleans

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

@Jan-Peter > > *this is a feature I long to implement for quite some time. This means it > is not possible with the EE right now. The following ideas came up to > provide a solution: 1. add IDs to certain elements and allow addressing > elements b ID. 2. Add tweaks with a predicate, e.g. at

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

2018-02-01 16:59 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > Ideally, I wanted a function > that I could use with the edition-engraver to tweak target elements inside > chords. I framed the question around accidentals in the post above, but > ultimately I hoped to be able to use the

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Stefano Troncaro writes: >> *But you also can use stuff like \once \accidentalStyle forget I think to >> similar effect.* >> > > Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, if you read my reply to > Caarg98 you'll notice that I'm looking for something more flexible.

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello Stéfano, this is a feature I long to implement for quite some time. This means it is not possible with the EE right now. The following ideas came up to provide a solution: 1. add IDs to certain elements and allow addressing elements b ID. 2. Add tweaks with a predicate, e.g. at moment

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

@Caagr98 > > > *If you could be a bit more specific about your goal (hiding all sharps? > Hiding accidentals on even-indexed notes? Hiding accidentals specifically > on cis?), that would make it possible to make a more specific function for > your goals. (Note that this function can only be used

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Stefano Troncaro writes: > Hello again everyone! > > Suppose I have the following example: > > \version "2.19.80"\language "english" > command = { > %What should go here to omit the sharp while keeping the natural?} > \score { > \new Staff { > \new Voice

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

In that case, you could use something like this: ⋘ \version "2.19.80" nth = #(define-music-function (n tweak mus) (integer? ly:music? ly:music?) (single tweak (list-ref (ly:music-property mus 'elements) n)) mus) { \nth 1 \omit Accidental % Remember, zero-indexed } ⋙ If you could be

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

I just tried it, but unfortunately it appears to only work when used inside the chord, and I need to find a way to do it from outside. 2018-01-31 17:39 GMT-03:00 Caagr98 : > You could try \single instead of \once, as in cs,>. > > On 01/31/18 21:27, Stefano Troncaro wrote: > >

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

You could try \single instead of \once, as in . On 01/31/18 21:27, Stefano Troncaro wrote: > Hello again everyone! > > Suppose I have the following example: > > \version "2.19.80" \language "english" command = { %What should go here to > omit the sharp while keeping the natural? } \score {

Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello again everyone! Suppose I have the following example: \version "2.19.80"\language "english" command = { %What should go here to omit the sharp while keeping the natural?} \score { \new Staff { \new Voice \relative c'' { \key b \minor \accidentalStyle modern \partial 4

Re: Certain accidentals

Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com schrieb: [Amadeus] And if you'd life to get an F-natural in the key of D major, how would you write that? I'll look that up, I have got the manual. My guess would be something like fn or its equivalent according

Re: Certain accidentals

Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: I find that very annoying, but he insists that it is in no way ambiguous (because you always _see_ the score fragment you're working on and the editor also always shows you the effective key). And he insists that it is much more efficient simply because

Re: Certain accidentals

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Actually I'm currently in a discussion with a (highly) professional engraver using Amadeus (a Unix/Linux program that has been out of development for 15 years now but is still used by a number of professionals). Amadeus is a

Re: Certain accidentals

I'll look that up, I have got the manual. Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com schrieb am 19.04.2014: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Actually I'm currently in a discussion with a (highly) professional engraver using Amadeus (a Unix/Linux program that

Re: Certain accidentals

At 15:41 19/04/2014 +0200, Christ van Willegen wrote: And if you'd life to get an F-natural in the key of D major, how would you write that? Clearly, following normal musical notation, you'd annotate the F in some way as being not the expected F in D major (F#) - using something such as fn.

Re: Certain accidentals

Hi Brian, Since you are [ostensibly] sitting on the fence… ;) This is my “+1” for the cut-and-pastability (and, by extension, variable-referencibility, etc.) of Lily-code as noted by David K. Having engraved hundreds of Lilypond scores in the past 11 years — many with dozens of movements, 50+

Re: Certain accidentals

At 23:09 17/04/2014 -0300, Alfredo Noname wrote: I sometimes have to write many accidentals in a bar and was wondering if there was a way I could write the music in C major and then transpose only the notes I need to be sharpened or flattened. I'm not sure exactly what you mean here.

Re: Certain accidentals

a.l.f.r.e.d.o lompo_la...@yahoo.se writes: Hi, everybody.  I sometimes have to write many accidentals in a bar and was wondering if there was a way I could write the music in C major and then transpose only the notes I need to be sharpened or flattened.  Sure. You just need to mark the

Re: Certain accidentals

Hi Brian, 2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com: But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond, where notes that are named sharp or flat need to be qualified as such, notwithstanding what the \key indication would appear already to imply.

Re: Certain accidentals

Hi, On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Brian, 2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com: But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond, where notes that are named sharp or flat need to be

Re: Certain accidentals

At 14:41 18/04/2014 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: 2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker: But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond, where notes that are named sharp or flat need to be qualified as such, notwithstanding what the \key indication would appear

Re: Certain accidentals

At 07:57 18/04/2014 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote: In my experience, speaking that sort of thing--calling F-sharp F ... Sorry, but who made that suggestion, please? This was about notation, not description! On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: ... I don't want it

Re: Certain accidentals

Am 18.04.2014 15:38, schrieb Brian Barker: At 14:41 18/04/2014 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: 2014-04-18 8:26 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker: But perhaps you are referring to the method of textual input in Lilypond, where notes that are named sharp or flat need to be qualified as such, notwithstanding

Re: Certain accidentals

Hi Brian, On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.comwrote: At 07:57 18/04/2014 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote: In my experience, speaking that sort of thing--calling F-sharp F ... Sorry, but who made that suggestion, please? This was about notation, not

Re: Certain accidentals

At 08:58 18/04/2014 -0500, David Nalesnik wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Brian Barker wrote: By the way, if you get to have a thousand times as many votes as I do, I'll make a note not to bother competing with you in any future dispute. ;^) Not sure how to take that, but I certainly

Re: Certain accidentals

At 15:48 18/04/2014 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: Am 18.04.2014 15:38, schrieb Brian Barker: No - certainly not (though I know people who do!). You are quite right not to believe I could be that foolish. But there is still a difference in the representations: in musical notation, a note on the F

Re: Certain accidentals

in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Certain-accidentals-tp161597p161633.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Certain accidentals

in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Certain-accidentals-tp161597p161637.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Certain accidentals

Hi, everybody.  I sometimes have to write many accidentals in a bar and was wondering if there was a way I could write the music in C major and then transpose only the notes I need to be sharpened or flattened. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Certain accidentals

I think, if you don't specify a key at all, the music will always be in C (no accidentals at the staff's beginning). Of course the notes have all necessary accidentals. Best, Robert On 18 Apr 2014, at 04:09, a.l.f.r.e.d.o lompo_la...@yahoo.se wrote: Hi, everybody. I sometimes have to