Hi Matthew (et al.),
> My guess is that since chord names are most often used at all for things
> like popular songs, which are relatively short and may not contain a whole
> lot of other difficult engraving, this won't be prohibitive in practice.
Unfortunately, that won't help me in many of my
2017-07-05 21:53 GMT+02:00 :
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> So I tried a proof of concept, although I'm not convinced of the idea
>> to have chords as markup only.
>
> Thank you! This seems to be a big improvement and I hope it'll reduce the
> perennial
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, Thomas Morley wrote:
> So I tried a proof of concept, although I'm not convinced of the idea
> to have chords as markup only.
Thank you! This seems to be a big improvement and I hope it'll reduce the
perennial confusion people have with chord names, if we can simply point
Thank you for this really nice piece of code!
2017-07-05 1:09 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> Hi all,
>
> in the long thread starting at
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Chords-in-LilyPond-td203294.html
> a method to have a more direct way to typeset chords was