> Le 5 déc. 2019 à 18:02, Mark Stephen Mrotek a écrit :
>
> Jacques,
>
> You do not need to use chord notation and the \set command.
> Fingering down indicated by the _ (underscore), e.g., a,4_3, and the up
> fingering by the ^ (carat), e.g., e^1
> The - (dash) is a neutral setting and
Are you looking for this?
\override Staff.Fingering.direction = #DOWN
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
: Re: Fingering orientation question
Thanks Thomas for the explanation and example!
>> Would it be reasonable and feasible to apply such fingering orientation at
>> the voice level?
>
> Not sure what you mean…
In my piano example, all the fingerings for the left hand appear be
-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Jacques Menu
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2019 12:17 AM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: Fingering orientation question
Hello folks,
In the attached score, I’ve had to create artificial one-note chords
JM,
You can just use ^ to put the fingering above or _ to put it below. If the
voice will always be the lower voice (as in your left-hand piano example)
this works well. BUT it doesn't allow you to choose the orientation (top or
bottom) after inputting the notes. Note that using - (as in your
Thanks Thomas for the explanation and example!
>> Would it be reasonable and feasible to apply such fingering orientation at
>> the voice level?
>
> Not sure what you mean…
In my piano example, all the fingerings for the left hand appear below the
notes, so I wondered whether this could be
Am Do., 5. Dez. 2019 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Jacques Menu :
>
> Hello folks,
>
> In the attached score, I’ve had to create artificial one-note chords such as
> for the down fingering orientation to be taken into account:
>
> \set fingeringOrientations = #'(down)
>
> 4 a, e | % 2
>
> I didn’t
Hello folks,
In the attached score, I’ve had to create artificial one-note chords such as
for the down fingering orientation to be taken into account:
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(down)
4 a, e | % 2
I didn’t find other ways to achieve this result in the docs.
Would it be reasonable
