> On Aug 27, 2023, at 11:55 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
I do not think that my Times New Roman font is corrupted.
>>
>> Actually, I think it is: Most likely the font's 'post' table is
>> broken (i.e., it has a wrong PostScript name for glyph 'N').
>> Normally, you won't see the problem
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 08:49, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 28 août 2023 à 08:45, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>> You might try to copy the affected font from macOS 14 to macOS 13 and
>>> check whether it works.
>>
>>
>> This bug has already been fixed in Homebrew. Please
> Le 28 août 2023 à 08:45, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
>
>
>
>> You might try to copy the affected font from macOS 14 to macOS 13 and
>> check whether it works.
>
>
> This bug has already been fixed in Homebrew. Please just uninstall and
> reinstall LilyPond and it should go away.
> You might try to copy the affected font from macOS 14 to macOS 13 and
> check whether it works.
This bug has already been fixed in Homebrew. Please just uninstall and
reinstall LilyPond and it should go away.
Jean
> Jean did the analysis then, he can tell more.
D'oh, *I* did the analysis then :-)
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
Werner
>>> I do not think that my Times New Roman font is corrupted.
>
> Actually, I think it is: Most likely the font's 'post' table is
> broken (i.e., it has a wrong PostScript name for glyph 'N').
> Normally, you won't see the problem at all because most applications
> access a font's 'cmap' table
>> I am experiencing a very weird problem with Lilypond on macOS 13
>> Ventura. When using the Times New Roman font, the capital letter N
>> is mis-printed.
Have a look at the thread starting at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-12/msg00349.html
which discusses a very
Hi.
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 11:36, David F. wrote:
>
> I am experiencing a very weird problem with Lilypond on macOS 13 Ventura.
> When using the Times New Roman font, the capital letter N is mis-printed.
>
I can confirm and replicate this under 13.4.1
> I do not think that my Times New Roman
>> It was diagnosed as a bug in the font (!), not in LilyPond.
>
> Yes, I saw the issue. That's extraordinarily weird.
It's not.
> It is one of the fonts installed with Microsoft Office so maybe this
> should be reported to Microsoft.
Newer versions of this font have it fixed. For example,
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 16:11, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 02/01/2023 à 14:31, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
> > Le 31/12/2022 à 18:23, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> >> I sent the font file to you privately.
> >
> > Thanks, I opened
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
>
>
> It was
Le 02/01/2023 à 14:31, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 31/12/2022 à 18:23, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
I sent the font file to you privately.
Thanks, I opened
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
It was diagnosed as a bug in the font (!), not in LilyPond.
OpenPGP_signature
Le 31/12/2022 à 18:23, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
I sent the font file to you privately.
Thanks, I opened
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6508
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 17:39, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> Le 31/12/2022 à 17:11, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 16:33, Jean Abou Samra
> wrote:
> >
> > Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > I have just updated my sheet
Le 31/12/2022 à 17:11, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 16:33, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0.
It went
> well, but I am seeing a strange
On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 16:33, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0. It went
> > well, but I am seeing a strange font encoding problem.
> >
> > I have installed LilyPond on a Mac
Le 31/12/2022 à 14:56, Sven Axelsson a écrit :
Hi list,
I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0. It went
well, but I am seeing a strange font encoding problem.
I have installed LilyPond on a Mac M1 running MacOS 13.1 with Homebrew
which builds from source using Guile
Hi list,
I have just updated my sheet music archive to LilyPond 2.24.0. It went
well, but I am seeing a strange font encoding problem.
I have installed LilyPond on a Mac M1 running MacOS 13.1 with Homebrew
which builds from source using Guile 3.0.
Running this code
\version "2.24.0"
\markup
Hi!
Maybe you can try installing de development version (2.19.*).
El 16/11/2016 8:51 p. m., "Thiago Censi" escribió:
> Hello.
>
> I am new to Lilypond. I am on Xubuntu 16.04 and installed the packages via
> the default repositories. I am having a problem with the fonts used
sample code to e.g.
title = \markup { \fontsize #-20 "Test" }
you can see that the "T" is about the right size. But then the kerning
is scaled down and thus completely of.
> I suspect it is a PDF/font problem (though it also happens with PNG, but I
> don't know if the
more or less, just LilyPond, Frescobaldi, Latex, and Inkscape. Hope
this helps!
This is what your test looks like on my XFCE:
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n196797/xfce.png>
(sorry the attachment didn't work the way I wanted it to!)
-
composer | sound designer
Hi, Mark.
I knew there was nothing wrong with the code itself, I wanted some
directions with the font problem. I sownloaded the liilypond file here:
http://eugenecormier.com/?p=157
And this is what it looks like after compiling on my system:
http://i.imgur.com/uZMzfZw.png
Michael, the actual
Hi Thiago,
> I am new to Lilypond. I am on Xubuntu 16.04 and installed the packages via
> the default repositories. I am having a problem with the fonts used in the
> score. I don't know if it is a Lilypond problem or a package missint or
> something else. I tried looking in the manual, Google
Thiago,
I removed the “%” and everything looked correct.
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Thiago Censi
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:50 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Font problem
Hello.
I am new
Hello.
I am new to Lilypond. I am on Xubuntu 16.04 and installed the packages via
the default repositories. I am having a problem with the fonts used in the
score. I don't know if it is a Lilypond problem or a package missint or
something else. I tried looking in the manual, Google and etc, but
Hi list,
I use lilypond-book and lualatex for a project.
I have a .ily file with
\paper {
indent = 0
ragged-right = ##f
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree Mala's Handwriting
Mala's Handwriting
Mala's Handwriting
Addendum:
I tried to force lilypond to use this font by adding
\context {
\Score
\override LyricText.font-name = Mala's Handwriting
}
to the .ily file, but there's no difference.
Properly included in a \layout { ... } environment, of course.
Marc
Sorry for the noise, I fould the culprit:
the standalone snippets were (erroneously) built with the latest
self-compiled lilypond, whereas lilypond-book is an older version
that did not find the font.
Marc
Am 03.08.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Marc Hohl:
Addendum:
I tried to force lilypond to
Could you start a new subject rather than replying to the Digest if you want
help?
Which operating system are you using?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Kale Good
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest,
Am 2011-08-15 um 12:38 schrieb Jean-Alexis Montignies:
I don't see why pango or fontconfig would use this font as I doubt
it has the char I'm looking for, may be I can try to remove the X11
folder from the font search path. I'll dig into pango and fontconfig.
Henning, would you try compiling
On 14 août 2011, at 23:47, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Here are the messages I get in the console:
warning: no PostScript font name for font
`/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/10x20.pcf.gz'
It's improbable that you want to use an X11 font with LilyPond.
To be more precise: LilyPond only
To be more precise: LilyPond only handles outline fonts. A proper
filter to ensure that is still missing. Reason is that the
FontConfig interface doesn't provide a means to implement it.
IIRC, there is already a bug tracker issue which covers this.
I don't see why pango or fontconfig
compiled version is that it is 2-4 times faster.
I guess it's a fink, font cache, font library, font problem. May be you hint
which library should I look into for this problem. Does anyone have a
dependency list for lilypond?
Here are the messages I get in the console:
warning: no PostScript
version works with the same chars.
The advantage of the fink compiled version is that it is 2-4 times
faster.
I guess it's a fink, font cache, font library, font problem. May be
you hint which library should I look into for this problem. Does
anyone have a dependency list for lilypond
Here are the messages I get in the console:
warning: no PostScript font name for font
`/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/10x20.pcf.gz'
It's improbable that you want to use an X11 font with LilyPond.
To be more precise: LilyPond only handles outline fonts. A proper
filter to ensure that is
I don't know how you're trying to change the font, but LyricText
supports font-interface, which has font-name as a user-settable
property. Remember that for lyrics, you have to have a space on both
sides of the period, i.e.: \override LyricText . font-name
On 09.11.2008, at 03:24, 胡海鹏 Hu
Hello,
Still for my song. The full orchestral score has finished yesterday, but I
don't know how to override the font of Lyrics. It seems that LyricText can't
accept #'font-name, and though I used #仿宋_GB2312 For the Chinese texts, Lily
still says the warning for not knowing how to embed
What version of LilyPond did you install?
Also, what Windows version do you have?
(Please answer to the mailing list)
/Mats
Quoting Matthew Leerberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am a new user to Lilypond, and can't get the titles or footers to appear
correctly in the PDF output. Instead, it
Hi Mats, et al.,
I really appreciate your response. In trying to respond to your
question, I realized that in trying to fix the problem myself, I had
actually uninstalled LilyPond, and was instead producing the scores
with Cygwin bash.exe. I had originally had the same problem when
only using
If you download the latest stable version, 2.8.3, from the Downloads
page at www.lilypond.org, there is no need to use Cygwin.
/Mats
Quoting Matthew Leerberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mats, et al.,
I really appreciate your response. In trying to respond to your question, I
realized that in
I am a new user to Lilypond, and can't get the titles or footers to
appear correctly in the PDF output. Instead, it displays a series
of rs and ps and commas. Even the Lilypond tagline at the
bottom appears this way. I am using Windows. Did I install
some font file incorrectly? Thanks for the
There have been some reports of similar problems on the mailing
list, but I cannot recall having seen any universal solution. Obviously
the installation works for most people.
Anyway, do you have any specific reason to use the Cygwin version?
Otherwise, I would recommend to use the native windows
Hi there - having heard good things about Lilypond and needing to typeset for
SATB, I thought I'd give it a go.
However I cannot get lyrics working - using the following code (taken from the
lyrics tutorial):
\relative {
r4 c \times 2/3 { f g g }
Using Lily 2.6.4 with Cygwin
I have problems with new font system. If I do not specify anything, the
output is Sans-Serif. If I try to specify what is in the doc to have Roman
output, i.e.
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree
Times New Roman Helvetica Courier
(/
Hi all,
I posted this message yesterday, but didn't see any reactions on it, so
I guessed it may have been overlooked.
If not, sorry :)
The problem is this:
When running lilypond-book with the option --psfonts on a tex file, it
says that it is unable to extract Aybabtu-Regular from the
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you tried. If I understand you
correctly, the problems you reported first with missing font symbols
for text fonts, was when you tried the Cygwin installation. Right?
Then, you tried the non-cygwin version and got the error message
you included below,
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lilypond
i can do really good sheets but i can't add text
i think there is a problem of font : the text is printed with some
dynamic letters (such as f or m or p)
so some letters are not printed ...
i even tried to
Very strange, I haven't seen that problem reported earlier.
Lyrics certainly work well for me in WinXP.
Exactly which version of LilyPond did you install?
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lilypond
i can do really good
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Very strange, I haven't seen that problem reported earlier.
Lyrics certainly work well for me in WinXP.
Exactly which version of LilyPond did you install?
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
Once you get your basic font setup working, don't forget to save
your .ly file using UTF-8 encoding instead of Latin 1 (ISO 8859-1).
However, this doesn't explain the problems you show in your example.
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Very strange, I haven't seen
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
my version is 2.6.4 i send an example from the lilypond.org website
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.ly
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.pdf
can you check whether 2.6.3 does work for you?
Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
my version is 2.6.4 i send an example from the lilypond.org website
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.ly
http://membres.lycos.fr/cocatpe/Schubert.pdf
can you check whether 2.6.3 does work for you?
You didn't say earlier that you used the Cygwin installation.
I would recommend the non-Cygwin native Windows package
available at lilypond.org/web/install/, unless you have any specific
reason to work in Cygwin.
/Mats
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Maxime Brugidou
Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
You didn't say earlier that you used the Cygwin installation.
I would recommend the non-Cygwin native Windows package
available at lilypond.org/web/install/, unless you have any specific
reason to work in Cygwin.
/Mats
I wrote :
Hello
i installed lilypond with
Maxime Brugidou a écrit :
I wrote :
Hello
i installed lilypond with cygwin on my winXP and are now able to use
lilypond
but ok, i'm trying to use it the non-cygwin package, but i got an error :
Pange-ERROR **: file
I would really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version,
2.6.4.
Unfortunately, it's not included in the Debian archive, but you can use
the installation package at www.lilypond.org which should work on
almost any Linux.
If you want to stick to 2.4.5, it looks to me as if you have
Hello again,
The autopackage worked and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I only
wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian catches up.
Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installed and the texhash command didn't help.
Will try
and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I
only wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian
catches up. Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installed and the texhash command didn't help.
Will try 2.6 tonight. Thanks sofar.
Hans
Mats
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello again,
The autopackage worked and 2.6.4 solved the font problem. Thanks. I
only wonder how I am going to remove the installation when Debian
catches up. Later.
Cheers,
Hans
Hans wrote:
Hello Mats,
ec-fonts-mftraced is installed and the texhash command
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of fc-list
fc-list is already included in the Windows distribution.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Georg Dummer writes:
What's about fc-list Han-Wen mentioned? I have one in my cygwin environment
but not in my Lilypond Win-native.
If you have cygwin installed, you should be able to install the native
version of fc-list from the fontconfig package using min-apt:
PATH=/cygdrive/c/Program
=Regular
Bitstream Charter:style=Bold
-Original Message-
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 10:43 AM
To: Georg Dummer
Cc: lilypond-user; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Yet another font problem
Georg Dummer writes:
What's about fc-list Han-Wen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Georg Dummer writes:
What's about fc-list Han-Wen mentioned? I have one in my cygwin environment
but not in my Lilypond Win-native.
If you have cygwin installed, you should be able to install the native
version of fc-list from the fontconfig package using
Georg Dummer writes:
As I said fc-list is installed
Which fc-list? This looks a lot like cygwin's which is useless
(unless maybe you set
FONTCONFIG_FILE=/cygdrive/c/.../LilyPond/usr/etc/fonts.conf)
(the whole fontconfig package respectively)
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Mats Bengtsson writes:
Just tried it over here and got:
[snip]
wget: not found
Please install wget and try again?
Also set FONTCONFIG_FILE to what lilypond prints when using
LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Mats Bengtsson writes:
Just tried it over here and got:
[snip]
wget: not found
Sorry, missed that one!
Please install wget and try again?
Also set FONTCONFIG_FILE to what lilypond prints when using
LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1.
Maybe I shouldn't bother too much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under Windows, I think you have to use the filename of the font
(without the .TTF suffix), not the friendly-fontname.
This is easy to check. Someone running cygwin should just report the
names that fc-list prints.
Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Maybe lilypond should come with its own version of fc-list, so everyone
can check out the names for the fonts installed. This feature is
eligible for sponsoring.
Well, for what it's worth, in Windows 98 you can find font files -- click
Start -- Find -- Files or
\override #'(font-name . binnerd )
works fine, but
\override #'(font-name . minion regular )
comes out with the default(?) font.
Under Windows, I think you have to use the filename of the font
(without the .TTF suffix), not the friendly-fontname.
In my Windows/FONTS directory I
Hallo
I noticed a strange problem (version: windows 2.7.7) while trying to change
some fonts in a markup.
\override #'(font-name . binnerd )
works fine, but
\override #'(font-name . minion regular )
Comes out with the default(?) font.
Both are regular installed and well-working (ttf) fonts.
Hi:
I'm having a problem running lilypond 2.5.27. My setup is
TeTeX 3.0
Slackware Linux current
When I compile a lilypond file using the --verbose flag, I see that it
seems to be saying it's going to use Century Schoolbook as the text
font. When it gets to the point where it produces a PDF, it
OK, what happens if you do
ps2pdf testfont.ps
and view the resulting PDF file?
If the PS file looks OK, then I would definitely suspect your
Ghostscript (which is the program doing the job in ps2pdf).
Do you get the same problem both when viewing the PDF on screen
and when you print it on paper?
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/14591/
Notice the ugly clef and the title.
I used the 1.0.12 version of ec-fonts-mftraced. Living on
Debian Woody has its quirks concerning updmap, but I did
my best. Any hints where the
Did you build the ec-fonts-mftraced yourself? I would guess so,
since you have problems both with the feta fonts in LilyPond and
the ec-font used for the title.
In that case, it must be something wrong with your mftrace (or
some of the programs it uses).
If you want to verify that a certain font
Hi,
Lily compiled from CVS branch 2_4 a couple of weeks ago
produces a perfect Postscipt file from the following
snippet:
\version 2.4.5
\header {
title = A
}
\score {
\notemode { r4 }
}
However, the PDF looks like this (compacted manually):
attachment: problem.png
Or if the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Nieuwenhuizen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
This is *linux*. rpm -U fails, rpm --install fails ... and why
should I expect it to make any difference?
TeX may have been updated, and there's a postinstall script.
Unfortunately, mktexlsr
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Nieuwenhuizen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
ec-fonts-mftraced is not installed - except rpm -U fails with
already installed.
Try to reinstall ec-fonts-mftraced or run mktexlsr by hand.
This is *linux*. rpm -U fails, rpm --install fails ...
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
This is *linux*. rpm -U fails, rpm --install fails ... and why
should I expect it to make any difference?
TeX may have been updated, and there's a postinstall script.
Unfortunately, mktexlsr doesn't make any difference either.
The check that configure does is to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Nieuwenhuizen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
There is a problem with the ec-fonts-mftraced package, it is not
tetex-3.0 compatible. Bertalan made manual fixes for cygwin,
but there is no autodetection yet.
Any more news?
Yes,
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
ec-fonts-mftraced is not installed - except rpm -U fails with
already installed.
Try to reinstall ec-fonts-mftraced or run mktexlsr by hand.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien |
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Nieuwenhuizen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Doug Asherman writes:
I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
The problem I'm seeing is that the generated .ps and .pdf files have no
fonts except for the notes and associated stuff like
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Nieuwenhuizen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Doug Asherman writes:
I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
Stuff deleted --
Any more news?
I'm trying to install 2.4.5 on SuSE 9.1, and seeing as
Anthony W. Youngman writes:
There is a problem with the ec-fonts-mftraced package, it is not
tetex-3.0 compatible. Bertalan made manual fixes for cygwin,
but there is no autodetection yet.
Any more news?
Yes, ec-fonts-mftraced v1.0.12 is tetex-3.0 compatible.
I'm trying to install 2.4.5 on
Hi:
I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
under Linux. I've read the compilation instructions, and aside from a
small problem with espgs, everything seemed to go well.
I automatically source lilypond-profile when I log in, so that's not the
problem. I also run
Doug Asherman writes:
I compiled 2.4.5 from the tarball -- I'm trying to use it with tetex-3.0
The problem I'm seeing is that the generated .ps and .pdf files have no
fonts except for the notes and associated stuff like time signatures,
etc. But I'm not seeing title, composer, rehearsal
hello,
I have to say first I'm a beginner, even if I already had some good
result on lilypond 2.2.
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
and I think it works , the only (big) problem is all the text fonts
are now huge and mixed up on the resulting pdf file; only the ps file
has correct font
On 9-Dec-04, at 6:40 AM, Paul Crabbe wrote:
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
Please upgrade to stable lilypond in fink (it's 2.4.2, IIRC)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, you may have to do a fink selfupdate. I missed that step and kept
wondering why the Fink distribution was so far behind the current
version. :)
On Dec 9, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On 9-Dec-04, at 6:40 AM, Paul Crabbe wrote:
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
Please
Le 9 déc. 04, à 21:41, Graham Percival a écrit :
On 9-Dec-04, at 6:40 AM, Paul Crabbe wrote:
I installed lilypond 2.3.13 on Mac OSX
Please upgrade to stable lilypond in fink (it's 2.4.2, IIRC)
Cheers,
- Graham
BTW, you may have to do a fink selfupdate. I missed that step...
that was it! I did
Hello list, hello Pedro,
You wrote:
Roland Goretzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/lilypond-snapshot-doc_2.4.0-2_all.deb
I actually meant:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/lilypond-snapshot_2.4.0-2_i386.deb
Well, I installed them both,
Hi at all,
after installing lilypond-snapshot 2.4.0 from Pedro Kroegers site
on a never-online-host with dpkg as follows:
dpkg -i ec-fonts-mftraced_1.0.7-1_all.deb
dpkg -i lilypond-snapshot_2.4.0_i386.deb
and both worked successfully, I got the following error message
after running
Roland Goretzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi at all,
after installing lilypond-snapshot 2.4.0 from Pedro Kroegers site
on a never-online-host with dpkg as follows:
dpkg -i ec-fonts-mftraced_1.0.7-1_all.deb
dpkg -i lilypond-snapshot_2.4.0_i386.deb
and both worked successfully, I
Hello list, hello Pedro,
You wrote:
could you, please, try the new and corrected version I upload recently?
it's here:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/lilypond-snapshot-doc_2.4.0-2_all.deb
Please, let me know if it works for you (or not).
Now there is another error message:
ERROR:
Roland Goretzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/lilypond-snapshot-doc_2.4.0-2_all.deb
I actually meant:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/lilypond-snapshot_2.4.0-2_i386.deb
Now there is another error message:
ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path:
update a lot of programs around this (e.g.
tetex-bin
libkpathsea-perl
libkpathsea3
gsfonts
gsfonts-x11
libnet-perl
perl-modules
libhtml-parser-perl
libwww-perl
perl
perl-base
libcfitsio2
libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl
), but the font-problem remains
Hi All,
When compiling lilypond 2.3.9 or 2.3.10 from source, everything compiles
fine, but when I run the program, I get the following error:
Parsing...
Interpreting music... error: can't find `feta20.afm'
Music font has not been installed properly. Aborting
The font was traced properly and
Did you read about the file lilypond-profile (or lilypond-login if
you use tcsh) in INSTALL.txt?
/Mats
J. Scott Amort wrote:
Hi All,
When compiling lilypond 2.3.9 or 2.3.10 from source, everything compiles
fine, but when I run the program, I get the following error:
Parsing...
Interpreting
Hi All,
When compiling lilypond 2.3.9 or 2.3.10 from source, everything
compiles fine, but when I run the program, I get the following error:
Parsing...
Interpreting music... error: can't find `feta20.afm'
Music font has not been installed properly. Aborting
The font was traced
Hello,
Using pedro's packages on debian unstable, I experience fonts problem : running
lily generates good .dvi file, but wrong postscript file (gv or ggv show score
without noteheads)...
I tried to delete the font cache, but the problem remains.
More : using dvips -f -Z on the dvi file built a
Hi gang - Just reinstall debian on my system (I was flirting with FBSD
5.1). Lilypond 1.8.0 (apt-geted from unstable) works great, except that
pdfs have font weirdness in the heading. Compare the attached dvi and
pdf. I've attached the ly source as well.
% Generated automatically by:
Tyler Eaves writes:
Hi gang - Just reinstall debian on my system (I was flirting with FBSD
5.1). Lilypond 1.8.0 (apt-geted from unstable) works great, except that
pdfs have font weirdness in the heading. Compare the attached dvi and
pdf. I've attached the ly source as well.
Both look fine
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo