Re: Grandstaff multi-bar rest count shared between staves

2024-01-16 Thread Vaughan McAlley
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:42, Martin Brown wrote: > To answer my own question, I've fudged this with: > \omit MultiMeasureRestNumber at the start of the bass line > \override MultiMeasureRestNumber.Y-offset = -5 at the start of the > treble line > but that seems a bit fragile. Eg. if the

Re: Grandstaff multi-bar rest count shared between staves

2024-01-16 Thread mskala
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Martin Brown wrote: > To answer my own question, I've fudged this with: >     \omit MultiMeasureRestNumber at the start of the bass line >     \override MultiMeasureRestNumber.Y-offset = -5 at the start of the > treble line > but that seems a bit fragile. Eg. if the staves

Re: Grandstaff multi-bar rest count shared between staves

2024-01-16 Thread Martin Brown
To answer my own question, I've fudged this with: \omit MultiMeasureRestNumber at the start of the bass line \override MultiMeasureRestNumber.Y-offset = -5 at the start of the treble line but that seems a bit fragile. Eg. if the staves need to be separated more. Any other solutions?

Grandstaff multi-bar rest count shared between staves

2024-01-15 Thread Martin Brown
Where two-stave scores (eg. piano) have multiple bars rest in common between the treble and bass parts, the number of bars rest should be placed once, in between the two staves, not separately on each stave. How can I achieve this in Lilypond? By default, it seems to treat each stave's rest count