Re: Is the default value for Beam.details.stem-length-demerit-factor too small?

+1 > > On Sep 29, 2022 at 9:28 PM, mailto:valen...@petzel.at)> > wrote: > > > > > Hello Pondmates! > > > > > Doricos old development blog features an issue about Beams: > > > > https://blog.dorico.com/2015/03/development-diary-part-10/ > > >

Re: Is the default value for Beam.details.stem-length-demerit-factor too small?

> Increasing the Beam.details.stem-length-demerit-factor does prevent > this and produces an in my eyes slightly better looking Beam. +1 Have you run LilyPond's test suite to check whether everything else looks fine with this setting? Werner

Re: Is the default value for Beam.details.stem-length-demerit-factor too small?

On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 05:26, Valentin Petzel wrote: > Hello Pondmates! > > Doricos old development blog features an issue about Beams: > > https://blog.dorico.com/2015/03/development-diary-part-10/ > > Daniel Spreadbury does remark on the the shortness of certain beamed Stems > in Lilypond

Is the default value for Beam.details.stem-length-demerit-factor too small?

Hello Pondmates! Doricos old development blog features an issue about Beams: https://blog.dorico.com/2015/03/development-diary-part-10/[1] Daniel Spreadbury does remark on the the shortness of certain beamed Stems in Lilypond (Product C). Increasing the Beam.details.stem-length-demerit-factor