Hi Trevor,
thanks for sharing your thoughts with such an analytical insight.
So, still waiting for the system...:)
Really, there are some people interested in this stuff so would be
nice to have a wiki or something...
Best
-a-
On 30 Nov 2007, at 18:24, Trevor Bača wrote:
Hi Andrea and
On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:18, Andrea Valle wrote:
I don't like lisp-like languages. I really prefer OO languages.
Haskell http://haskell.org/ is an OO functional language with more
working math like syntax (the LISP syntax comes from Church's thesis
in mathematical logic). There is a Haskell
On 30.11.2007 (11:24), Trevor Bača wrote:
Hi Andrea and Miguel and Eyolf and everybody,
The initial efforts were
all implemented in C ...
major or minor? :)
So (lack of) robustness drove me away from C
What's more robust than a C major chord?
Sorry for joking -- thanks for your story. I
Hi Andrea and Miguel and Eyolf and everybody,
Sorry I've been absent from this thread for a bit; Andrea's guessing right
that I've been busy ...
:-)
Warning: lots of words, and it's all personal stuff, too.
Quite a few years ago I sat down and made the conscious decision that trying
to write
Miguel Lopes Santos Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm considering either moving back to Common LISP with Lilypond output
or using the built-in Scheme interpreter; but although I have a 15+ year
programming background, I'm not finding it very easy to use Lilypond Scheme.
I found googling
From: Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I typically use lilypond for algorithmic composition.
I use Python to =20= script lily.
Sorry to meddle in the thread.
Why Python and not the built-in Scheme interpreter?
Personal preference or something you would advise other people to?
I would be
(Still can't understand this list behaviour of replying to the author
and not to the list...)
Hi Miguel,
I don't like lisp-like languages. I really prefer OO languages. More,
I've always find difficult to understand lily internals (no figure,
scheme stuff etc).
So, for my personal
The thread about strange meters made me wonder: have any of you
lilypudlians used LP to write serial music? It would seem to be an ideal
combination: make a variable and expose it to different output parameters.
I assume that with some scheme code, a sequence of pitches could be
translated into
I typically use lilypond for algorithmic composition. I use Python to
script lily.
Serial practices are just very simple cases.
There are other on the list doing so in very complex ways (e.g.
Trevor Bača).
Best
-a-
On 27 Nov 2007, at 22:44, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
The thread about strange
Hi,
(that should have been to the list, sorry to bother you Andrea)
On Nov 28, 2007 12:27 AM, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I typically use lilypond for algorithmic composition. I use Python to
script lily.
Serial practices are just very simple cases.
There are other on the list
10 matches
Mail list logo
