Re: One beam, two voices?

2013-07-09 Thread Urs Liska
Am 08.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Urs Liska: Am 08.07.2013 15:39, schrieb John Kliewe: Thanks very much Urs -- the tip about moving the \override outside of the \times did the trick. The reason I duplicated the entire phrase in each voice is that I want to see the second group of 16ths in a

One beam, two voices?

2013-07-08 Thread John Kliewe
Thanks very much Urs -- the tip about moving the \override outside of the \times did the trick. The reason I duplicated the entire phrase in each voice is that I want to see the second group of 16ths in a single-beam group.  By limiting the dual-voice treatment only to the small tuple that

Re: One beam, two voices?

2013-07-08 Thread Urs Liska
Am 08.07.2013 15:39, schrieb John Kliewe: Thanks very much Urs -- the tip about moving the \override outside of the \times did the trick. The reason I duplicated the entire phrase in each voice is that I want to see the second group of 16ths in a single-beam group. By limiting the dual-voice