Hello Jean,
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:54 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
(Lots of helpful stuff)
> HTH
> Jean
>
Yes, that was exactly what was wrong, thanks!
Christ van Willegen
> I run into a problem when I create a (very high) single-page PDF file from a
> Lilypond score. 'After a certain time', the rest of the page is rendered in
> white.
>
> In my use case, I wanted to make a large system staff, and white-on-black
> music, because of r
Hi,
I run into a problem when I create a (very high) single-page PDF file from
a Lilypond score. 'After a certain time', the rest of the page is rendered
in white.
In my use case, I wanted to make a large system staff, and white-on-black
music, because of readability-reasons. Specifically
There is a known bug when combining `\tocItem` and `\bookpart`. See [issue
#6355](https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6355). I've just posted a
workaround on the issue.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello all,
I have many \tocItem-s inside different bookparts wich i compile to one PDF
document. I expected, that the \tocItem-s will create automatically bookmarks
in my PDF document and they will appear in my PDF viewer, but is not the case.
Can anybody help with this issue?
Best regards
Hello Vlad,
You will not avoid intermediate files in any case, as Lilypond with gs output
will generate ps code, which is then turned into a pdf. If you want to pipe
PDFs for convenience you might create a wrapper say plilypond in the search
path doing something like this:
#!/bin/bash
t
On 13 Jan 2024, at 02:05, Curt McDowell wrote:Have you actually tried this? LilyPond appends ".pdf" to the output filename (and ".midi"). If you try to make the fifo ending in ".pdf", you find lilypond removes the fifo before writing a new file. For the same r
Have you actually tried this? LilyPond appends ".pdf" to the output
filename (and ".midi"). If you try to make the fifo ending in ".pdf",
you find lilypond removes the fifo before writing a new file. For the
same reasons, the output file cannot be /dev/stdout. Ma
On 05/01/2024 03:46, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 04 Jan 2024 at 23:34:28 (+0100), Volodymyr Prokopyuk wrote:
I know that lilypond can receive a source.ly file from the stdin by
using lilypond
-. Is it possible for lilypond to output PDF to the stdout?
My motivation behind using lilypond
Thank you very much for your thoughts!
I expected that the PDF output to stdout would be difficult to implement
due to multiple Lilypond backends, and, probably, is not a real bottleneck
in PDF generation. It is nice to know that intermediary files are already
handled by a FS cache, and can
On Thu 04 Jan 2024 at 23:34:28 (+0100), Volodymyr Prokopyuk wrote:
>
> I know that lilypond can receive a source.ly file from the stdin by
> using lilypond
> -. Is it possible for lilypond to output PDF to the stdout?
>
> My motivation behind using lilypond in a pipeline
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > intermediate "files" will be written to and read from the buffer cache at
> > RAM speed and only later go to the disk in the background.
>
> That depends on the file system and its synchronization model. I once
> sped up a script to control
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024, Volodymyr Prokopyuk wrote:
>
>> My motivation behind using lilypond in a pipeline is to speed up PDF
>> generation by avoiding storing intermediary files on disk. The pipeline I'd
>
> Is that issue real? In Linux
This doesn't exist, sorry. It wouldn't be *that* straightforward to implement,
because there are multiple code paths for output (GhostScript via API,
GhostScript
via subprocess, SVG backend and Cairo). I'm not even sure that direct PDF output
in GhostScript's PS → PDF conversion is not going
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024, Volodymyr Prokopyuk wrote:
> My motivation behind using lilypond in a pipeline is to speed up PDF
> generation by avoiding storing intermediary files on disk. The pipeline I'd
Is that issue real? In Linux and most other operating systems,
intermediate "files"
Hi,
I know that lilypond can receive a source.ly file from the stdin by
using lilypond
-. Is it possible for lilypond to output PDF to the stdout?
My motivation behind using lilypond in a pipeline is to speed up PDF
generation by avoiding storing intermediary files on disk. The pipeline I'd
like
On 11/24/23 10:49 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
I only have one \book block in my case as I think I always do. As I
mentioned the file-1.pdf usually is accompanied by error messages
leading to a fix which eliminates the file-1.pdf but not in this case.
At this point it's just a nuisance not worth
> I only have one \book block in my case as I think I always do. As I
> mentioned the file-1.pdf usually is accompanied by error messages
> leading to a fix which eliminates the file-1.pdf but not in this case.
> At this point it's just a nuisance not worth creating a MWE.
The
On 11/24/23 2:15 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
This typically happens when you have several \book blocks,
which requests separate output files. For example
\book { { c' } } % => file.pdf
\book { { c' } } % => file-1.pdf
Jean, Thank you for your reply.
I only have one \book block in my cas
This typically happens when you have several \book blocks,
which requests separate output files. For example
\book { { c' } } % => file.pdf
\book { { c' } } % => file-1.pdf
Best,
Jean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
What kind of errors generate a PDF with -1 added? i.e. file.ly
generates file-1.pdf .
No errors appear when Lily generates the PDF. Usually when I get
file-1.pdf there are error message(s) and I fix the problem and don't
get another file-1.pdf . Now I have a case where I continually get
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 05:15, Abe Raher wrote:
>
> p.s. This story ended oddly.
>
> I uninstalled ghostscript and then installed ghostscript 10.02.0.
>
> I pinned that version.
>
> Still got the error ...
>
> Uninstalled lilypond.
>
> Reinstalled lilypond – this required unpinning ghostscript.
>
On 20 Nov 2023, at 04:02, Abe Raher wrote:p.s. This story ended oddly.I uninstalled ghostscript and then installed ghostscript 10.02.0.I pinned that version.Still got the error ...Uninstalled lilypond.Reinstalled lilypond – this required unpinning ghostscript.Now it's all working. Odd because
3/ps/lilyponddefs.ps]
Paper_outputter elapsed time: 0.02 seconds
Converting to `template-notes-only.pdf'...
Preparing Ghostscript command to
`/var/folders/fc/k1101v7s4vd830chswfjssdhgn/T//lilypond-tmp-7181336':
<< /OutputFile (./lilypond-tmp-4496227.pdf) /CompatibilityLevel 1.4
/PageSize [59
Thank you!
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 1:46 AM William Rehwinkel <
will...@williamrehwinkel.net> wrote:
> yes, it is a known bug due to a ghostscript security patch. Try using
> the pre-built binary for lilypond instead of homebrew.
>
> -William
>
> On 11/15/23 01:13, Ernie Braganza wrote:
> > I
yes, it is a known bug due to a ghostscript security patch. Try using
the pre-built binary for lilypond instead of homebrew.
-William
On 11/15/23 01:13, Ernie Braganza wrote:
I just updated my Mac using Homebrew and I now get this error when I run
lilypond. It compiles fine if I create a
I just updated my Mac using Homebrew and I now get this error when I run
lilypond. It compiles fine if I create a PostScript file using the --ps
option.
My ghostscript was updated to version 10.02.1 Is there a known bug? I get
this when I run lilypond with the -V switch:
GPL Ghostscript
cript (the software used by LilyPond
> to convert its PostScript output to PDF) had a “security fix release”,
> version 10.02.1, which removed a function that was used by LilyPond
> (apparently because it was somehow found to be insecure). See issue 6675
> <https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilyp
pt, but I
> couldn't make it to work.
That thread is not about the same problem as this thread.
Your specific Ghostscript error is
```
Error: /undefined in finddevice
```
The problem is that recently, Ghostscript (the software used by LilyPond to
convert its PostScript output to PDF) had a “
>>> Processing `template-notes-only.ly'
>>> Parsing...[/usr/local/Cellar/lilypond/2.24.2/share/lilypond/2.24.2/ly/
>>> init.ly
>>> Using `nederlands' note names...[template-notes-only.ly]
>>> template-notes-only.ly:1: warning: no \version stateme
r/lilypond/2.24.2/share/lilypond/2.24.2/fonts/otf/emmentaler-11.otf
>> CFF name for font Emmentaler-11 is the same.]
>>
>> [/usr/local/Cellar/lilypond/2.24.2/share/lilypond/2.24.2/fonts/otf/emmentaler-13.otf
>> CFF name for font Emmentaler-13 is the same.]
>>
>> [/usr/l
/fonts/otf/emmentaler-23.otf
> CFF name for font Emmentaler-23 is the same.]
> Interpreting music...
> elapsed time: 0.00 seconds
> MIDI output to `template-notes-only.midi'...Track...
> [0]
> [1]
> Finding the ideal number of pages...
> [lilypond_serif_3.8662109375]
ly.pdf'...
Preparing Ghostscript command to
`/var/folders/fc/k1101v7s4vd830chswfjssdhgn/T//lilypond-tmp-5075810':
mark /OutputFile (./lilypond-tmp-2864435.pdf) /CompatibilityLevel 1.4
/PageSize [595.28 841.89] (pdfwrite) finddevice putdeviceprops pop
(pdfwrite) selectdevice newpath f
:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:09 AM Kenneth Wolcott
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi;
>>
>> How to "guarantee" Lilypond pdf (letter) output with sufficient
>> margins for 3-hole punch?
>
>
> It's no guarantee, but I put the following in m
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:09 AM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
> Hi;
>
> How to "guarantee" Lilypond pdf (letter) output with sufficient
> margins for 3-hole punch?
>
It's no guarantee, but I put the following in my paper block:
two-sided = ##t
inner-margin = 12
Hi;
How to "guarantee" Lilypond pdf (letter) output with sufficient
margins for 3-hole punch?
I'm looking forward to having a method of "guaranteeing" Lilypond
pdf output for letter (not a4) of my engravings such that the
resulting printout can be three-hole pu
as to how to move forward. Although the Scheme code is amazing,
I don't want to have to maintain it from version to version, mainly because
I lack the knowledge of how to do so. I cannot go back to using a book for
the MIDI score because of the problem of "-1" being appended to the PDF
file name. What's a stable way of naming the MIDI score files?
--
Knute Snortum
Yes, of course it is :). But I think there are reasonable cases to do so. The
issue here is of course stability: If we wanted to issue some code which is
supposed to remain functional for years to come, this is ill suited, as it
does not solely rely on the interface Lilypond provides. So if you
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le mardi 27 juin 2023 à 21:17 +0200, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
>
> Hello Knute,
>
> so you are using books to allow specification of the midi filename. This
> is
> probably a fine usecase, but it still seems like a bit of an abuse of the
>
Le mardi 27 juin 2023 à 21:17 +0200, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
> Hello Knute,
>
> so you are using books to allow specification of the midi filename. This is
> probably a fine usecase, but it still seems like a bit of an abuse of the book
> mechanic to me. Rather I’d adapt the midi output name
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:19 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Knute,
>
> so you are using books to allow specification of the midi filename. This
> is
> probably a fine usecase, but it still seems like a bit of an abuse of the
> book
> mechanic to me. Rather I’d adapt the midi output name
ng collections of pieces, such as Bach's 15 two-part
> inventions. I want to be able to create a "book" with all the pieces in
> one PDF, but also to be able to print each piece individually. And I want
> to be able to tweak the MIDI output, so I use \keepWithTag to do that. So
ing collections of pieces, such as Bach's 15 two-part
inventions. I want to be able to create a "book" with all the pieces in
one PDF, but also to be able to print each piece individually. And I want
to be able to tweak the MIDI output, so I use \keepWithTag to do that. So
I have an &quo
Hello Knute,
I do not think this behaviour is particularly weird, rather the input is
weird.
Using \book is telling Lilypond you want to generate a new PDF. So there
should be no reason to enclose scores that only produce MIDI into a \book
clause. And if you do I think it should
Le lundi 26 juin 2023 à 16:39 -0700, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> I've run into some odd behavior in LilyPond. If your PDF-only is a score but
> your MIDI-only is a separate book, the PDF file gets "-1" appended to the
> file name. So for instance, with this code:
>
I've run into some odd behavior in LilyPond. If your PDF-only is a score
but your MIDI-only is a separate book, the PDF file gets "-1" appended to
the file name. So for instance, with this code:
File name: test.ly
%%%
\version "2.25.6"
theNotes = { c'4 4 4 4 }
\
>> I have been using the line
>>
>> #(ly:set-option 'embed-source-code #t)
>>
>> to embed the lilypond files I used in the PDF, but was wondering
>> if there was a procedure I could call to embed some other file,
>> such as a PDF of the s
Le mercredi 31 mai 2023 à 17:23 -0400, William Rehwinkel via LilyPond user
discussion a écrit :
> Dear list,
>
> I have been using the line
>
> #(ly:set-option 'embed-source-code #t)
>
> to embed the lilypond files I used in the P
Dear list,
I have been using the line
#(ly:set-option 'embed-source-code #t)
to embed the lilypond files I used in the PDF, but was wondering if
there was a procedure I could call to embed some other file, such as a
PDF of the source I used for the transcription? Sorry, looking through
/delfini-tune.ly
- LaTeX/FilkTex: https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/draketos-songbook/browse/delfini.flk
created with https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/draketos-songbook/browse/build.sh:
for i in *.ly; do
lilypond -dbackend=eps -dno-gs-load-fonts -dinclude-eps-fonts --pdf -o
"$(basename "$i&q
+infinity
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 3:41 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Andrew Bernard writes:
>
> >> On 18/03/2023 11:44 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Hi Werner, With NBN in Australia, the speeds are amazing. [...]
> >>> Well, a great percentage of the world does not have such amazing
> >>>
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Am Sonntag, 19. März 2023, 11:40:49 CET schrieb David Kastrup:
>> The political system in the U.S. considers bribes by lobbyists a First
>> Amendment protected variant of free speech.
>
> This deserves to be printed on calendars, t-shirts and mugs ...
I have my own
Am Sonntag, 19. März 2023, 11:40:49 CET schrieb David Kastrup:
> The political system in the U.S. considers bribes by lobbyists a First
> Amendment protected variant of free speech.
This deserves to be printed on calendars, t-shirts and mugs ...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Andrew Bernard writes:
>> On 18/03/2023 11:44 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Hi Werner, With NBN in Australia, the speeds are amazing. [...]
>>> Well, a great percentage of the world does not have such amazing
>>> circumstances...
>
> Well as I said, I don't know. I thought America would be way
Well as I said, I don't know. I thought America would be way ahead.
On 18/03/2023 11:44 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Hi Werner, With NBN in Australia, the speeds are amazing. [...]
Well, a great percentage of the world does not have such amazing
circumstances...
Werner
It's kinda sorta on by default in Frescobaldi. engrave -preview is
Ctrl-M and engrave - publish -Ctrl-Shift-P. And the engrave icon, when
you press it, without going through the dropdowns, is preview by default.
|-dembed-source-code| is off by default.
> Le 18 mars 2023 à 16:58, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
> Different mostly redundant font subsets for thousands of images add up.
That is the problem that appears for LilyPond’s documentation PDFs, which embed
lots of examples. We are talking about standalone scores here, not
documentation.
Paul Hodges writes:
> From: Andrew Bernard
>
> In this day of gigabyte this an terabyte that, does a large PDF matter
> very much? What is the issue of concern?
>
> Unnecessary waste of resources is always a poor idea, especially if it
> is unexplained.
>
>
>
Le samedi 18 mars 2023 à 23:19 +1100, Andrew Bernard a écrit :
> I don't have any quantitative data but I image turning off the embedding
> of the source code would reduce file size in the PDF which may help.
`-dembed-source-code` is off by default.
signature.asc
Descr
Hi Andrew,
In this day of gigabyte this an terabyte that, does a large PDF matter
very much? What is the issue of concern?
1. For transferring/emailing, smaller is better for a number of reasons.
2. For those of us (e.g., Music Directors) who store and use multiple
PDFs of complete musicals
> Hi Werner, With NBN in Australia, the speeds are amazing. [...]
Well, a great percentage of the world does not have such amazing
circumstances...
Werner
.
Andrew
On 18/03/2023 5:58 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In this day of gigabyte this an terabyte that, does a large PDF
matter very much?
IMHO yes. Today, PDF files are loaded *and* displayed in a browser.
The larger the file, the longer it takes until it gets displayed.
Additionally, an optimized
I don't have any quantitative data but I image turning off the embedding
of the source code would reduce file size in the PDF which may help.
Andrew
On 18/03/2023 10:38 pm, Volodymyr Prokopyuk wrote:
I've tried the https://github.com/pdfcpu/pdfcpu with very good results:
Hello,
I've tried the https://github.com/pdfcpu/pdfcpu with very good results:
- Lilypond with Ghostscript x1.5 => 5.3 MB PDF v1.5
- Lilypond with Cairo x4 => 15.0 MB PDF v1.5
- Lilypond with Cairo + pdfcpu x1 => 3.6 MB PDF v1.7
PDF outlines, hyperlinks and overall document a
From: Andrew Bernard
In this day of gigabyte this an terabyte that, does a large PDF matter
very much? What is the issue of concern?
Unnecessary waste of resources is always a poor idea, especially if it is
unexplained.
My concern is more wondering that if the ordinary PDF
Good morning Jean and Werner,
The alpha transparency and fonts embedded in SVG along with leaner code are
important advantages of Cairo. Thank you for outlining this!
I'll investigate ways to reduce PDF size and let you know the outcomes of
my investigation.
Thank you,
Vlad
On Sat, Mar 18
https://www.wikihow.com/Reduce-PDF-File-Size
Was compressed to zero bytes. :-)
On 18/03/2023 5:58 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Link missing?
> Here's some other compression solutions. This page points out that
> the tradeoff for squishing is lower quality images and text.
Link missing?
> In this day of gigabyte this an terabyte that, does a large PDF
> matter very much?
IMHO yes. Today, PDF files are loaded *an
Here's some other compression solutions. This page points out that the
tradeoff for squishing is lower quality images and text.
In this day of gigabyte this an terabyte that, does a large PDF matter
very much? What is the issue of concern?
Andrew
Nice tool, but don't get your expectations too high. There are
constraints in how much you can squash PDF's.
Andrew
On 18/03/2023 4:08 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
You might try `pdfsizeopt`.
https://github.com/pts/pdfsizeopt
> I can see that the size of the Cairo-generated PDF is around 3 times
> bigger compared to the same document generated with Ghostscript? Is
> there is way to reduce the size of the Cairo-generated PDF?
You might try `pdfsizeopt`.
https://github.com/pts/pdfsizeopt
Werner
Le vendredi 17 mars 2023 à 22:57 +0100, Volodymyr Prokopyuk a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> What are the benefits of using Cairo backend for PDF generation in Lilypond
> compared to Ghostscript?
It is very advantageous from the internal point of view (much less code and
more reliable cod
Hi,
What are the benefits of using Cairo backend for PDF generation in Lilypond
compared to Ghostscript? Will the Cairo backend become the recorrended
default backend for PDF generation or will Ghostscript remain as the
default backend for Lilypond?
I can see that the size of the Cairo-generated
Hello Ian,
You’re far better off moving to LilyPond 2.23.80 at once.
Here is how I installed it on my Mac Mini M1 some days ago.
HTH!
JM
—
LilyPond devel from MacPorts for Apple silicon
If not yet done, download MacPorts for your MacOS version from
brary of tunes, but it now jams at the end of
compiling and there is no pdf, but a rotating wheel; and, occasionally the
'log' message:
" Processing
`/Users/ianwest/Documents/Music/LilyPond/PianoViVaVC/GrünewaldViVa/Grünewald2.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][
Le 25/10/2022 à 19:01, thedoctor81...@tutanota.com a écrit :
Ok - so I need to relpy all instead of just reply?
Yes.
Cheers,
Jean
Ok - so I need to relpy all instead of just reply?
Thank you so much!
Michael Dykes
--
Sent with Tutanota, enjoy secure & ad-free emails.
Oct 25, 2022, 12:53 by j...@abou-samra.fr:
> Hi,
>
> I am adding back the list in copy. Please always include the list in your
> replies so that
Hi,
I am adding back the list in copy. Please always include the list in
your replies so that everyone can participate and benefit from the answers.
Le 25/10/2022 à 18:48, thedoctor81...@tutanota.com a écrit :
Hi Jean,
I am sorry to sound like I don't know what I'm doing, but this is what
Le 25/10/2022 à 18:15, thedoctor81877--- via LilyPond user discussion a
écrit :
Hi, sorry I thought I had replied to Abraham about my pdf not
compiling, but didn't.
The pdf wasn't in a seperated window, and when i tried re-comppiling
the input file, the pdf still wasn't compiling
Just guessing, but is the old PDF open in a separate viewer? Some viewers
lock the file and Lilypond won't be able to overwrite the old one until the
file is closed in the viewer.
The other possible thing I can think of is saving the input file first,
then compiling it. If you don't save, the PDF
I have a lilypond file, and I changed the title and subtitle and recompiled
using Frescobaldi; however, I now am not getting a pdf file created.
I am using:
Frescobaldi 3.2
Lilypond 2.22.2
Pop OS 22.04
Thanks,
Michael D
--
Sent with Tutanota, enjoy secure & ad-free emails.
On Fri 16 Sep 2022 at 08:02:35 (-0700), Knute Snortum wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 11:29 PM Eef Weenink wrote:
> >
> > I use the crop function to minimize the white around the music.
>
> If you want, you can do this inside LilyPond in a paper block:
>
> top-margin = 5\mm
> bottom-margin
Hi
I have several devices to show the music on. Rather than try to adjust the
size, I measure the visible area on the screen and tell LilyPond to use
that as its paper size. I have a 27" screen, so for that, I set the paper
size to half the width and get my PDF viewer to show two pages at
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 11:29 PM Eef Weenink wrote:
>
> I use the crop function to minimize the white around the music.
If you want, you can do this inside LilyPond in a paper block:
top-margin = 5\mm
bottom-margin = 6\mm
left-margin = 10\mm
right-margin = 10\mm
--
Knute Snortum
the white around
the music.
3. If needed I export this pdf for printing on paper A4 or A3 sized.
Best results in not too much time.
Met vriendelijke groet, Eef
H.E. Weenink MBA
> Op 16 sep. 2022 om 02:59 heeft David Wright het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> On Thu 15 Sep 2022
Perhaps I have to modify the pdf itself? If so, does that decrease the
> clarity/precision of the presentation?
Yes, if you want to make the music larger on each page, with
fewer measures/line and lines/page, and using more pages.
#(set-global-staff-size 20.0) is the default. Increase or
de
t 4:50 PM Kenneth Wolcott
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi;
> >
> > Perhaps I'm not searching the Lilypond documentation wisely, but I do
> not see a way to enlarge the entire Lilypond output in scale (staff, notes,
> text, everything).
> >
> > Perhaps I have to m
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 4:50 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> Perhaps I'm not searching the Lilypond documentation wisely, but I do not
> see a way to enlarge the entire Lilypond output in scale (staff, notes, text,
> everything).
>
> Perhaps I have to modif
Hi;
Perhaps I'm not searching the Lilypond documentation wisely, but I do not
see a way to enlarge the entire Lilypond output in scale (staff, notes,
text, everything).
Perhaps I have to modify the pdf itself? If so, does that decrease the
clarity/precision of the presentation?
I'd like
From: Aaron Hill
There is certainly no shortage of good ideas from the many users on the
mailing list. Anytime someone is able to publish the source for a
real-world score, there is hope of finding some new pattern or structure
that can streamline your own work.
I suspect that if I
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:25 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-07 4:04 am, Paul McKay wrote:
> > Thanks very much, Aaron. I hadn't noticed that. It worked perfectly.
> > Thanks to Knute for engraving them too. It will be *so *good to see how
> > real .ly files look. I will do my best to steal
On 2022-09-07 4:04 am, Paul McKay wrote:
Thanks very much, Aaron. I hadn't noticed that. It worked perfectly.
Thanks to Knute for engraving them too. It will be *so *good to see how
real .ly files look. I will do my best to steal all the good ideas.
There is certainly no shortage of good ideas
that the .ly files are included. (I have spotted
that
exporting the lilypond source when making a PDF is an option in
Frescobaldi.) All the searches I have done just talk about how LilyPond
exports to PDF. Can someone please tell me how to retrieve such the .ly
from the .pdf.
There is a separate download
that
exporting the lilypond source when making a PDF is an option in
Frescobaldi.) All the searches I have done just talk about how LilyPond
exports to PDF. Can someone please tell me how to retrieve such the .ly
from the .pdf.
Many thanks in advance
Paul
On 7/4/22 11:06, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Do you volunteer to go update the installation instructions for the
new binaries (https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6310) and
test them on Linux + macOS + Windows? That would be very welcome (no
irony intended).
Well, saying that actually
From: Aaron Hill
LilyPond does not require nor does it request elevation.
I didn't think it did. But sometimes people change the priority of programs
for reasons we may not realise. I merely pointed out that Windows has a way to
prevent drag and drop working, in case this was
On 2022-07-04 8:03 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
We are getting to the nub of it. When you save the test.ly file you
have to save it to C:\Users\\Desktop not the default which is
C:\Users\Public\Desktop. And make the start directory in the link
C:\Users\\Desktop [...]
Nothing should ever be
We are getting to the nub of it. When you save the test.ly file you have
to save it to C:\Users\\Desktop not the default which is
C:\Users\Public\Desktop. And make the start directory in the link
C:\Users\\Desktop (making it blank did not work for me).
Andrew
On 2022-07-04 5:49 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2022-07-04 5:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't understand this. Dragging test.ly on the desktop to
the LilyPond icon on the desktop fails to produce the PDF output. Both
on Windows 10 and 11.
That is a different issue than the UAC drag
On 2022-07-04 5:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't understand this. Dragging test.ly on the desktop to
the LilyPond icon on the desktop fails to produce the PDF output. Both
on Windows 10 and 11.
That is a different issue than the UAC drag-and-drop limitation that was
mentioned
1 - 100 of 1605 matches
Mail list logo
