I meant to send a pull request, but I forgot to do it.
I may do it today but I'm not sure about the version I have. For example,
my file is 424 lines long, no line 437 and no typo... Last change on my
file system is 8 December. See file attached.
This is the place waiting for the files:
2014-04-24 9:37 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
Hi Federico,
I may do it today but I'm not sure about the version I have. For example,
my file is 424 lines long, no line 437 and no typo... Last change on my
file system is 8 December. See file attached.
It's shorter because
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
Additionally LillyJAZZ.ily was updated with all recent improvements.
Hi Harm,
Sorry to come that late into this discussion (I've just moved to v2.18
LilyJAZZ few minutes ago).
Just to say that there is a typo line 437 :
\revert Staff.KeyCancellation #'stenci(l)
Cheers,
So where is now the latest and most complete version of LilyJAZZ?
We would still like to make it accessible through the openLilyLib snippets
repo, just beside the SMuFL/Bravura adaptor
Urs
Schneidy pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com schrieb am 23.04.2014:
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
Additionally
2014-04-24 0:34 GMT+02:00 Schneidy pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
Additionally LillyJAZZ.ily was updated with all recent improvements.
Hi Harm,
Sorry to come that late into this discussion (I've just moved to v2.18
LilyJAZZ few minutes ago).
Just to say that there
Am 10.12.2013 07:19, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 10.12.2013 00:49, schrieb Janek Warcho?:
2013/12/8 David Kastrupd...@gnu.org:
Shall be does not state when. It's certainly not a replacement for a
formal submission. If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
get him to place the thing in
2013/12/8 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Shall be does not state when. It's certainly not a replacement for a
formal submission. If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
get him to place the thing in some public place with a clear license
statement, it would not get lost in case he
Am 10.12.2013 00:49, schrieb Janek Warcho?:
2013/12/8 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Shall be does not state when. It's certainly not a replacement for a
formal submission. If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
get him to place the thing in some public place with a clear license
2013/11/25 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
I have to add that some opinions were raised that we can't simply put
something in such a library that was 'published' on lilypond-user without
asking back with the author - who seems to be unreachable for LilyJAZZ.
in the archives I've found his
In his initial announcement, he wrote, At any rate, the whole LilyJAZZ issue
shall be open and free (just like Lilypond)...
Is that not enough?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/msg00647.html
Curt
On Dec 8, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Curt accou...@museworld.com writes:
In his initial announcement, he wrote, At any rate, the whole
LilyJAZZ issue shall be open and free (just like Lilypond)...
Is that not enough?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/msg00647.html
Shall be does not state when. It's
2013/12/2 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Wouldn't it make sense to integrate the bend stuff into LilyPond? That
would make it easier to match versions and behavior.
I think that it would be great.
I've never used it much because of version conflicts and because I hoped
that 1196 would have been
2013/12/2 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
it's because grace-notes are beamed per default with 2.17.96.
Change the example to
\bendGrace { \preBendRelease c8( \noBeam d)( } c2) r2
or better the definition of 'preBendRelease' to
Wouldn't it make
2013/12/2 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com
2013/12/2 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Wouldn't it make sense to integrate the bend stuff into LilyPond? That
would make it easier to match versions and behavior.
I think that it would be great.
I've never used it much because of version
2013/11/26 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
If Marc or Harm are reading this message, I've just compiled bendtest.ly
with 2.17.96 and there's a problem in measure 10: a beam appears and I get
this warning:
Drawing systems...
bendtest.ly: warning: no viable initial configuration found:
Hi,
2013/12/2 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
2013/11/26 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
If Marc or Harm are reading this message, I've just compiled bendtest.ly
with 2.17.96 and there's a problem in measure 10: a beam appears and I get
this warning:
Drawing systems...
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2013/11/26 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
If Marc or Harm are reading this message, I've just compiled bendtest.ly
with 2.17.96 and there's a problem in measure 10: a beam appears and I get
this warning:
Drawing systems...
bendtest.ly:
2013/11/26 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2013/11/25 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
If you'd like to help with getting bend stuff and LilyJAZZ into
openlilylib/snippets that would be absolutely awesome! We accept pull
requests on github, or you could send us patches. If you
2013/11/25 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
If you'd like to help with getting bend stuff and LilyJAZZ into
openlilylib/snippets that would be absolutely awesome! We accept pull
requests on github, or you could send us patches. If you don't feel
comfortable with such workflows, It
2013/10/9 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
I followed this thread only loosely.
As long as we can't directly include LilyJAZZ into LilyPond I suggest
making it available (and improvable) here:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/LilyJAZZ
I just created a folder where all
2013/11/24 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2013/10/9 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
I followed this thread only loosely.
As long as we can't directly include LilyJAZZ into LilyPond I suggest
making it available (and improvable) here:
Am 25.11.2013 00:11, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/11/24 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2013/10/9 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
I followed this thread only loosely.
As long as we can't directly include LilyJAZZ into LilyPond I suggest
making it available (and improvable) here:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Tim McNamara wrote:
Thanks for having a bash at that. As a matter of taste, I think I
prefer not having the font's sharps and flats used in the chord names
because they look disproportionately large compared to the text, whereas
the default accidentals look fine to my
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Maybe it could even be possible to design a music font that improves the
reading skills for people who have always had trouble to read music.
Something comparable to that special text font that was designed for people
with dyslexia:
Am 10.10.2013 01:56, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2013/10/9 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
[...]
One more thing which might be useful for the technical issues you are
talking about:
I started a snippet to switch program execution based on the used LilyPond
version
Am 10.10.2013 08:10, schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Tim McNamara wrote:
Thanks for having a bash at that. As a matter of taste, I think I
prefer not having the font's sharps and flats used in the chord names
because they look disproportionately large compared to the text,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:40:06AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Hi,
this is another font and simply installing the font doesn't changes
accidentals in chords with alterations.
True, I intentionally showed LilyPond's standard chordname
formatting.
I customize the look of my chord symbols
Thanks Harm for the report and Marc for the suggestion.
Actually when reading your first email I had already noticed and fixed
the issue.
I'm somewhat frustrated how this could have happened. Originally I typed
that function correctly and I would have sworn someone has modified it
afterwards.
Am 10.10.2013 11:34, schrieb Urs Liska:
...
OK, it's fixed now and extended by the other predicates:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/general-tools/lilypond-version-predicates.ily
Sorry, wrong link.
___
lilypond-user mailing
Am 09.10.2013 01:07, schrieb Jim Long:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
\override ChordName #'font-name = #lilyjazzchord
Hi Jim,
never heard of lilyjazzchord.
Where to get?
Compiling your snippet returns
2013/10/9 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
[...]
One more thing which might be useful for the technical issues you are
talking about:
I started a snippet to switch program execution based on the used LilyPond
version
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
\override ChordName #'font-name = #lilyjazzchord
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:46:45PM +, Steve Noland wrote:
An additional question: can someone provide a snippet that shows how the
LilyJAZZ fonts do with jazz chordnames?
\version 2.17.26
\include LilyJAZZ.ily
globalMusic = {
\time 4/4
\key a \minor
} % globalMusic
harmonies =
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
\override ChordName #'font-name = #lilyjazzchord
Hi Jim,
never heard of lilyjazzchord.
Where to get?
Compiling your snippet returns LilyPond-default for the ChordNames.
Cheers,
Harm
___
lilypond-user
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
\override ChordName #'font-name = #lilyjazzchord
Hi Jim,
never heard of lilyjazzchord.
Where to get?
Compiling your snippet returns LilyPond-default for the ChordNames.
35 matches
Mail list logo
