Hi Vaughan,
Despite one comment here on the list, using as SSD will make no virtually
no noticeable difference to lilypond. It is not disk IO bound, and we are
not talking about reading gigabytes of files. You may want an SSD for
general reasons, but in terms of pure lilypond, having the fastest
On 17 November 2016 at 13:24, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My 2008 iMac is reaching the end of its useful life, and I would like to
> replace it with some kind of desktop computer that runs Debian. Given that a
> significant proportion of my time on this new
Hi Vaughan,
Your choral score is beautiful, Most impressive. Well done. Another
fantastic use of lilypond.
It seems your score has become a standard benchmark for lilypond
performance tests now!
A couple of points. It is very often the case that when running Linux on
Virtualbox or similar under
Am 17.11.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Knut Petersen:
Hi Vaughan!
I’ve included a large project if anyone with a newish computer would like to
test their compilation time. The main file is MDSM.ly. It takes my computer
between 4 and 5 minutes to compile.
I tried my old computer ... Pentium-M
Original-Nachricht
For comparison:
iMac 3.2 GHz Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM, late 2013
macOS 10.12.1
LilyPond 2.19.50 (Files updated)
58"
Thomas
I compiled the file(s) on the same machine with VirtualBox Debian
Jessie: only 40 seconds!
Original-Nachricht
For comparison:
iMac 3.2 GHz Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM, late 2013
macOS 10.12.1
LilyPond 2.19.50 (Files updated)
58"
Thomas
I compiled the file(s) on the same machine with VirtualBox Debian
Jessie: only 40 seconds!
For comparison:
iMac 3.2 GHz Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM, late 2013
macOS 10.12.1
LilyPond 2.19.50 (Files updated)
58"
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
AMD FX-3600 here.
real1m26.823s
cpu MHz : 1400.000
bogomips: 7032.75
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On 11/16/2016 8:24 PM, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> I’ve included a large project if anyone with a newish computer would
> like to test their compilation time. The main file is MDSM.ly. It
> takes my computer between 4 and 5 minutes to compile.
Thanks for sending that project! I find it very
Michael Gerdau writes:
>> I’ve included a large project if anyone with a newish computer would like
>> to test their compilation time. The main file is MDSM.ly. It takes my
>> computer between 4 and 5 minutes to compile.
>
> I've tested your files on both my windows machine and the
> I’ve included a large project if anyone with a newish computer would like
> to test their compilation time. The main file is MDSM.ly. It takes my
> computer between 4 and 5 minutes to compile.
I've tested your files on both my windows machine and the Linux box with
the broken font handling and
Hi Vaughan!
I’ve included a large project if anyone with a newish computer would like to
test their compilation time. The main file is MDSM.ly. It takes my computer
between 4 and 5 minutes to compile.
My system:
=
mainboard: asus h97 pro gamer
cpu: i7-4790K, 4.00 Ghz (turbo
Vaughan McAlley wrote
> Greetings,
>
> My 2008 iMac is reaching the end of its useful life, and I would like to
> replace it with some kind of desktop computer that runs Debian. Given that
> a significant proportion of my time on this new computer will be compiling
> Lilypond files, I was
Am Donnerstag, den 17. November 2016 um 13:24:24 Uhr (+1100) schrieb Vaughan
McAlley:
> Lilypond files, I was wondering which specs I should be prioritizing.
As lilypond is single-threaded, the number of cores is less important,
than CPU Freq and you should go for a lot of RAM (>= 16
GB).
Since
Hi,
mid-2014 laptop: Lily 2.19.49 on a Dell Latitude E5440, Arch Linux
chroot running on Debian Jessie: 49 sec, 1.25 GB peak memory usage.
Wouldn't recommend this particular laptop, though, but just included it
so that you have a ballpark figure.
% inxi -Fxz
System:Host: lap-11-52
Compiled 3 times on my Clevo w110er (Intel Core i7 3632QM - 2.2 Ghz - Ram 8
Go - Ubuntu 16.04 - LilyPond 2.19.47) :
lilypond MSDM.ly 48,50s user 0,96s system 99% cpu 49,706 total
lilypond MSDM.ly 51,27s user 0,79s system 99% cpu 52,244 total
lilypond MSDM.ly 51,66s user 0,78s system 99% cpu
Thank you for this useful test project!
Also just for fun and comparison,
on my Mac mini (2.3 GHz i7, 16 GB RAM) running OSX 10.9.5 and LilyPond 2.18.2
it took 2:41, 2:30, or 4:47 min
Greetlings, Hraban
Am 2016-11-17 um 03:24 schrieb Vaughan McAlley :
> Greetings,
>
>
36 seconds on i5-2500 3.3GHz, 8GB RAM, LilyPond 2.19.49
At 13:24 on 17 Nov 2016, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>My 2008 iMac is reaching the end of its useful life, and I would like
>to replace it with some kind of desktop computer that runs Debian.
>Given that a significant proportion of
On Thu 17 Nov 2016 at 13:51:51 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Well, that code does not compile and generates and error on 2.19.50, but it
> gets very close to the final PDF. On my new system with an i7-6700 it takes
> about 35 seconds, so I’d say of the order of 40 seconds.
The only errors I
On a laptop, but just for comparison, it took 44 seconds on an i5-5200U
processor.
I have heard that cache size can make a difference if you are recompiling
often. To check, I recompiled three more times and got 44 seconds each time.
So my cache doesn't seem to make any difference (3MB).
Memory
Hello Vaughan,
Well, that code does not compile and generates and error on 2.19.50, but it
gets very close to the final PDF. On my new system with an i7-6700 it takes
about 35 seconds, so I’d say of the order of 40 seconds.
I specified my new system that I built principally for lilypond,
Hi Vaughan,
By way of a benchmark/comparison: my mid-2011 iMac compiles your file in 59s.
Cheers,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
22 matches
Mail list logo