Hi Jay,
Thanks for the link. I'l look into it, but am practically sure that I
won't be able to fix anything. As mentioned I don't have any experience
with Scheme.
Best
Urs
BTW: The current piece not only has plenty of octaves (one voice is
virtually octaves-only), but each octave has a -.
Hello Urs,
the articulations are were copied to the EventChord - so I added copying
the articulations from NoteEvent to EventChord.
That means, they should not stay in the NoteEvents when getting wrapped
into the EventChord:
--snip--
\version 2.15.36
#(define (with-octave-up m octave)
I am not topposting
Let's see whether bypassing Gmane gets us into the discussion any
faster.
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
Hello Urs,
the articulations are were copied to the EventChord - so I added
copying the articulations from NoteEvent to EventChord.
That means, they
Hello David,
thank you for implementing this stuff!
This is nice, but there are two things to mention:
1. with Urs' example, lily complains about Slurs it can't finish
2. if you try this tiny snippet, the chord g b is actually broken in
two notes and the slur is typed twice.
So how do you
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
I was quite happy to find the function \makeOctaves in the LSR.
But now it seems to be broken - there is no error message, but the
function doesn't do anything (2.15.36).
As I don't know _anything_ about Scheme I can't do more than ask if
anybody has an
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
[...]
I recommend a healthy dose of cheating. The main non-triviality seems
to be dealing with relative music properly. Other than that it is just
\transpose c' c'' $xxx $xxx or similar. So let's treat the
problem at the root, with a to-relative-callback
I am not top posting
Yes, this is a duplicate, but perhaps with the not top posting
stupidity it will actually arrive at the list before the discussion is
over. I apologize for whichever copy will arrive latest.
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
[...]
I recommend a healthy dose of
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
Hello David,
thank you for implementing this stuff!
This is nice, but there are two things to mention:
1. with Urs' example, lily complains about Slurs it can't finish
Not really surprising since slurs start on two notes and finish on three
with the
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
Hello David,
thank you for implementing this stuff!
This is nice, but there are two things to mention:
1. with Urs' example, lily complains about Slurs it can't finish
Not really surprising since slurs start on
Hi all,
thank you very much for all these thoughts.
I'm so sorry that I don't understand a (Scheme) word from it ...
But judging from my programming experience in other languages David's
last solution looks _very_ elegant. And it seems to work, even with
still more complex chords and multiple
just another observation:
While it worked smoothly with the last example, the function complains
when there are phrasingSlurs involved. I get a message saying a) (at the
beginning) that there already is a phrasingSlur and b) (at the end) that
the phrasingSlur can't be ended.
The result is
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
just another observation:
While it worked smoothly with the last example, the function complains
when there are phrasingSlurs involved. I get a message saying a) (at
the beginning) that there already is a phrasingSlur and b) (at the
end) that the
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
I was quite happy to find the function \makeOctaves in the LSR.
But now it seems to be broken - there is no error message, but the function
doesn't do anything (2.15.36).
As I don't know _anything_ about Scheme I can't do
13 matches
Mail list logo
