I revise my answer from yesterday:
On 09/05/2013 11:48 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
2, the e,2 in the second voice is hidden by the d8 in the third voice
isn't that a bug ?
(I think you mean the e8 in the third voice.) I don't think it is a
bug, but it's contradictory to the text; as it says:
I will try to find a solution to your actual problem now.
Now, I want to merge two same looking notes. It works well for the
c4 in the third beat, 1st measure, above.
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
ma = \relative c' { \lcl d1 | g2 g | R1\fermataMarkup
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/05/2013 10:44 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#collision-resolution
{
c8 d e d c d c4
g'2 fis
} \\ {
c2 c8. b16 c4
e,2 r
} \\ {
\oneVoice
s1
e8
Peter Bjuhr:
I will try to find a solution to your actual problem now.
That's very kind of you, thanks.
Now, I want to merge two same looking notes. It works well for the
c4 in the third beat, 1st measure, above.
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
Peter Bjuhr wrote
No, the merging in beat 1 bar 2 fails because the note should be white
and not black. My mistake! The corrected version is shown further below
with \shiftOn.
and if you're not happy with the shift you can correct it like
\shiftOn
\tweak NoteColumn.force-hshift
On 09/06/2013 11:06 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Yes, I know.
But it's assumed in the text.
Hmm, where is that assumption stated?
This is simply non-obvious and confusing that in some examples one
cannot copy the visibly code and get the shown result.
Sorry if I stated the obvious! I interpreted
- Original Message -
From: Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: merging notes
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/05/2013 10:44 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices
On 09/06/2013 11:32 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
The same thing with rests, if only on rest, it applies both voices
if one rest and one note, seperate voices.
If only one whole note, both voices.
Two whole notes at same pitch just looks strange.
Have a look at:
On 09/06/2013 06:02 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Doesn't work for me, google complains I have a unsupported browser...
Or it might be that my connection is too slow.
I have sent you the image if you like to see it. But perhaps it is
unhelpful for your problem...
It might wery well be so that Ms.
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/06/2013 11:06 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
I revised my answer now in the morning, hope you have seen it. An e2
shouldn't look like an e4, I agree!
But I still don't think it is a bug.
If you use /oneVoice in this way
you have accept some additional fixing, which is also
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same
way. I will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version 2.17.10
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/06/2013 11:32 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
The same thing with rests, if only on rest, it applies both voices
if one rest and one note, seperate voices.
If only one whole note, both voices.
Two whole notes at same pitch just looks strange.
Have a look at:
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same way. I
will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
ma = \relative c' { \lcl
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same
way. I will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest
In the second bar, the filling in of the merged notehead on the half
note is avoided if you rearrange the music to put the merged notes in
the voices that are implicitly voiceOne and VoiceTwo:
\relative c''{
\mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn
\mergeDifferentlyDottedOn
{
c8 d e d c d c4
e,8 a b c
On 09/05/2013 10:44 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#collision-resolution
{
c8 d e d c d c4
g'2 fis
} \\ {
c2 c8. b16 c4
e,2 r
} \\ {
\oneVoice
s1
e8 a b c d2
}
1, why is the snippet
On 12/05/12 16:06, Nick Payne wrote:
In the documentation on collision resolution
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#collision-resolution),
it states: The \shiftOn command allows (but does not force) the notes
in a voice to be shifted. When \shiftOn is
Nick Payne wrote Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:23 AM
On 12/05/12 16:06, Nick Payne wrote:
In the documentation on collision resolution
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#collision-resolution),
it states: The \shiftOn command allows (but does not force) the notes
18 matches
Mail list logo
