Am 28.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Franciszek Boehlke:
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
I have not real experiance in using git that way, but can imagine a bit how
does it work. I think there are two main ways you can go, and possibly
using submodules is the third.
One way (which i would
On 09/30/2013 10:23 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 28.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Franciszek Boehlke:
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
I have not real experiance in using git that way, but can imagine a
bit how
does it work. I think there are two main ways you can go, and possibly
using
2013/9/30 Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
On 09/30/2013 10:23 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 28.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Franciszek Boehlke:
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
I have not real experiance in using git that way, but can imagine a
bit how
does it work. I think there are two
Dear all,
long time ago there was this thread about version controlling Lily
scores, and much more recently Urs' excellent essay and tutorial on the
LilyPond blog [1].
Now, that surely is a great read, but I'm left with one question. Over
time, I've collected a few scores, made with
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
To: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:11 AM
Subject: Re[surrecting]: Version Control and Public Repository
Dear all,
long time ago there was this thread about version
Hi Alexander,
of course I'm interested in this topic ;-) but I have a concert tonight
(anybody in/near Gelsenkirchen?) So I don't know if I can answer in detail
today ...
Best
Urs
Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de schrieb:
Dear all,
long time ago there was this thread about version
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
If you have scoreA.ly and this includes my-tweak.ily and you create a commit
in the git repo for this music, no matter how often you then alter my-tweak,
you could always return to the commit for this music, and my-tweak
- Original Message -
From: Alec Bartsch alec.bart...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de; Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de;
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Re[surrecting]: Version Control and Public
This is a common problem in software engineering. In my day job as a java
developer we use something called archiva which collects multiple versions of
the libraries we depend on. So if projectA (like your score) depends on
version 1.1 of a library (like your tweaks), while another project
On 09/27/2013 10:53 PM, Curt wrote:
This is a common problem in software engineering. [...]
I assumed so; I don't experience it in the projects I'm currently
involved in, but I am sure it is well studied.
For a git-only approach, the *classic* way of handling this - and I
haven't yet
2013/9/27 Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
Dear all,
long time ago there was this thread about version controlling Lily scores,
and much more recently Urs' excellent essay and tutorial on the LilyPond
blog [1].
Now, that surely is a great read, but I'm left with one question. Over
time,
11 matches
Mail list logo
