> On 4 Feb 2017, at 01:58, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> wrote:
> > Comparing yesterday's version (2 and 4 separate) and A (2&4 together),
> > I'd maintain that A describes the music more faithfully, and is
> > actually easier to read: when you reach 15 on the 4th-time
Yt was David Wright who wrote what you quote, not me.
> On 4 Feb 2017, at 01:58, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:12 PM, [David Wright ]
> wrote:
>
> > Comparing yesterday's version (2 and 4 separate) and A
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > Comparing yesterday's version (2 and 4 separate) and A (2&4 together),
> > I'd maintain that A describes the music more faithfully, and is
> > actually easier to read: when you reach 15 on the 4th-time through,
> >
> On 3 Feb 2017, at 21:51, David Wright wrote:
>
> On Fri 03 Feb 2017 at 20:23:07 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>> FYI, here are two versions with the repeat combined fro visual comarison. In
>> the first, there is a terminating repeat sign, in the second none.
>
>
On Fri 03 Feb 2017 at 20:23:07 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 3 Feb 2017, at 19:02, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> > wrote:
> >
> > > in that 2 needs a repeat barline at the end of the measures,
> > > you need one alternative each.
> >
> > Eh? Are you telling me
> > in that 2 needs a repeat barline at the end of the measures,
> > you need one alternative each.
>
> Eh? Are you telling me that I can't write the first rendition
> any more because, in the second, only 1 needs a repeat barline
> at the end of the measure, and 2 *mustn't* have one?
>
>
I was
On Thu 02 Feb 2017 at 13:41:52 (-0800), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> > When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that
> > normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but is
> > repeated in full. One way is to use Score.repeatCommands for
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 22:41, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> wrote:
>
> I'd say, in general, you need as many alternatives as there is unique
> material.
>
> Only 1 & 3 are the same, so you can combine those.
> 2 and 4 differ in that 2 needs a repeat barline at the end
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 20:56, David Wright wrote:
>> Yes, the idea was to just add "2x" to a repeat with two alternatives. How
>> would that look, in your view?
>
> Isn't there a danger that the "2x" will be seem as merely a redundant
> reinforcement of an ordinary
On Thu 02 Feb 2017 at 20:29:49 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 2 Feb 2017, at 19:35, Chris Yate wrote:
>
> >> > I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
> >> > alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at the end of any section that
> >> >
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 19:35, Chris Yate wrote:
>> > I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
>> > alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at the end of any section that
>> > needed it.
>> >
>> > Of course you might put labelling like "1, 3", "2",
On 2 Feb 2017 5:00 p.m., "Hans Åberg" wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:52, Chris Yate wrote:
> > Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best
engraving practice?
>
> The latter.
>
> I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:52, Chris Yate wrote:
> > Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving
> > practice?
>
> The latter.
>
> I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for each
> alternative, and expect a repeat symbol at
On 2 Feb 2017 16:49, "Hans Åberg" wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:09, Chris Yate wrote:
>
> Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best
engraving practice?
The latter.
I'd write and expect to read numbered horizontal brackets for
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:09, Chris Yate wrote:
>
> Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving
> practice?
The latter.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving
practice?
On 2 Feb 2017 15:18, "Hans Åberg" wrote:
> When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that
> normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but
When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that
normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but is
repeated in full. One way is to use Score.repeatCommands for alternatives
markup "1. 3" resp "2. 4", but then the "2." does not have a repeat. One
17 matches
Mail list logo