Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

> On Apr 12, 2017, at 5:18 AM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > > Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored > (without warnings!) > This tiny example compiles without warnings or errors, yet the Slurs in the > first two measures seem to be igno

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Hi Simon, Not obnoxious at all -- I'm grateful for the tips! Super helpful. Thank you. best, --p On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Am 12.04.2017 um 10:59 schrieb Pete Farmer: > >> This tiny example compiles without warnings or errors, >> > > Hi

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Am 12.04.2017 um 10:59 schrieb Pete Farmer: This tiny example compiles without warnings or errors, Hi Pete, just as a side note, without wanting to be obnoxious: There’s a lot to be improved about the code formatting in your example. Much of this just improves legibility, other points are

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Hi Harm, Thank you very much for your kind and patient explanation -- very helpful indeed! best, --p On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-04-12 10:59 GMT+02:00 Pete Farmer : > > Dear lilypond experts, > > > > This tiny

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

2017-04-12 10:59 GMT+02:00 Pete Farmer : > Dear lilypond experts, > > This tiny example compiles without warnings or errors, yet the Slurs in the > first two measures seem to be ignored. > > Measures three and four demonstrate that the issue can be resolved by > splitting

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Don't forget to reset double slurs when you do not need them any more \set doubleSlurs = ##f Otherwise you will get double slurs even for single notes (bug or feature?) -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Slurs-within-chords-within-tuplets-seem

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Hi Malte Meyn, That does exactly what I want -- how super! Thank you very much. And sorry for the un-tininess! -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Slurs-within-chords-within-tuplets-seem-to-be-ignored-without-warnings-tp202205p202209.html Sent from the User

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

ontext: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Slurs-within-chords-within-tuplets-seem-to-be-ignored-without-warnings-tp202205p202208.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https:

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Am 12.04.2017 um 11:17 schrieb Phil Holmes: > Without actually trying this out, it seems to me that the reason is > likely to be that your slur markings are inside chord notation. Try > putting them outside the chords and see if that helps. You’re right (slurs work but not phrasing slurs; also

Re: Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

- Original Message - From: Pete Farmer To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 9:59 AM Subject: Slurs within chords,within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!) Dear lilypond experts, This tiny example compiles without warnings or errors, yet

Slurs within chords, within tuplets -- seem to be ignored (without warnings!)

Dear lilypond experts, This tiny example compiles without warnings or errors, yet the Slurs in the first two measures seem to be ignored. Measures three and four demonstrate that the issue can be resolved by splitting into separate Voices, and could be cleaned up by tweaking, but as the music is