On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 01:28:29PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
I've also
added a couple paragraphs explaining my understanding of U.S. copyright
law and urging users to accept the CC license with commercial restriction
in honor of Margaret GreenTree's patient labor while
On 4 January 2011 09:17, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 01:28:29PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
I've also
added a couple paragraphs explaining my understanding of U.S. copyright
law and urging users to accept the CC license with commercial
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I think you are wrong. I think that this Margaret person has
created works that are under copyright, and you are taking those
works and claiming to offer them under a license that she did not
consent to.
Le 03/01/2011 19:28, Michael Ellis a écrit :
Mike, Graham, Henning,
Thanks again, it's all good discussion. For the time being, I've altered
the home page on the solfege-resources site to offer two choices of License,
namely Free Art license in addition to CC BY-NC-AS. I've also added a
Just a minor remark:
At least in German laws, there can't be a copyright on mere
industrial art like typesetting or music engraving, independent from
the effort. (I.e. Sweat of the brow from UK and Canadian
jurisdiction isn't valid in Germany.)
That means, there is no copyright on the
Interesting.
I spent an hour or so doing various searches looking for court decisions and
came up blank; I'm wondering if we're making a mountain out of a
mole-hill? Can somebody find an instance of a music publisher suing
somebody over such things? Like I say I couldn't find any with my average
Just to clarify: anything is copyrightable of course - there's no laws that
I'm aware of that
prevent people from asserting a copyright; question is, can it/has it a
chance of standing up?
M.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Mike Blackstock
blackstock.m...@gmail.comwrote:
Interesting.
I spent
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:16:44AM -0800, Mike Blackstock wrote:
Just to clarify: anything is copyrightable of course
That is false.
- there's no laws
that I'm aware of that
prevent people from asserting a copyright; question is, can it/has it a
chance of standing up?
You are
Mike, Graham, Henning,
Thanks again, it's all good discussion. For the time being, I've altered
the home page on the solfege-resources site to offer two choices of License,
namely Free Art license in addition to CC BY-NC-AS. I've also added a
couple paragraphs explaining my understanding of
Le 01/01/2011 22:45, Michael Ellis a écrit :
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the input. I've sent email to Margaret (whom I don't know
personally) asking her thoughts about the licensing. I've not yet heard
back from her.
I confess I went with a strong non-commercial clause largely in deference to
Le 01/01/2011 23:30, Graham Percival a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:08:38PM +0100, Phil Hézaine wrote:
Moreover, there are chorals which aren't changed from the Public Domain.
I've checked some of it against my sources. Well, only a little bit.
And i'm not sure of the data integrity of
Hi Phil Graham,
Thanks very much for the information and discussion. It's all
extremely useful. Let me see if I can paraphrase a few points that
are influencing my thinking:
We all seems to agree that:
1. The music of the chorales (the sequences of pitches and
rhythms notated in the
Le 02/01/2011 18:59, Michael Ellis a écrit :
Hi Phil Graham,
Thanks very much for the information and discussion. It's all
extremely useful. Let me see if I can paraphrase a few points that
are influencing my thinking:
We all seems to agree that:
1. The music of the chorales (the
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 12:59:39PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
We all seems to agree that:
1. The music of the chorales (the sequences of pitches and
rhythms notated in the Breitkopf edition) is public domain.
2. The Breitkopf edition itself is also in the public domain.
I haven't
Thanks Graham, it's good to get the straight story! I must say there are
certainly some confusing aspects to copyright law. So If I'm understanding
you correctly, if I were to transcribe a fugue from an out of copyright
source, I have a copyright if I make a mistake and none if I copy it
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:09:52PM -0500, Michael Ellis wrote:
Thanks Graham, it's good to get the straight story! I must say there are
certainly some confusing aspects to copyright law.
First, I must clarify that I cannot give you a straight story. To
begin with, I am not a certified
A few excerpts from the Wikipedia article on derivative works. Highlighting
and italics added by me.
17 U.S.C. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code
§ 103(b) http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/103(b).html provides:
The copyright in a compilation or derivative work
Hi Michael,
https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com
This webpage is not available.
The webpage at https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com/ might be
temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web
address.
Here are some suggestions:
Reload this web page later.
More
On 1 January 2011 15:56, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com
This webpage is not available.
The webpage at https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com/ might be
temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web
Thanks, Xavier,
This
https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com/hg/
works fine too, just a little bit work...
Francois
2011/1/1, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
On 1 January 2011 15:56, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com
This
'xcuse, me again...
hg ...
bash: hg command not found.
What is hg?
Francois
2011/1/1, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com:
Thanks, Xavier,
This
https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com/hg/
works fine too, just a little bit work...
Francois
2011/1/1, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
What i forgot: I owrk with cygwin
Francois
2011/1/1, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com:
'xcuse, me again...
hg ...
bash: hg command not found.
What is hg?
Francois
2011/1/1, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com:
Thanks, Xavier,
This
https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com/hg/
On 1 January 2011 16:19, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com wrote:
'xcuse, me again...
hg ...
bash: hg command not found.
What is hg?
Mercurial.
It's a distributed revision control system like git.
You should install it first, with
sudo apt-get install mercurial
for instance (Ubuntu
On 1 January 2011 16:25, Music Teacher alicuota...@gmail.com wrote:
What i forgot: I owrk with cygwin
Apparently mercurial is also available on Windows.
http://mercurial.selenic.com/downloads/
Maybe this link is worth a look too:
http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/WindowsInstall
Cheers,
Xavier
Apologies for the sloppy cut and paste on the URL. BTW, thanks to
all of you who helped me during the past couple weeks. I'm not sure
I'd have kept with it otherwise. And, of course, thanks to Jan and
Han-wen and the development team for LilyPond! There's no way this
could have been done so
Hi Michael and all,
Copy from the previous discussion:
Le 31/12/2010 20:33, Michael Ellis a écrit :
Hi Phil,
The problem is pretty well solved. I'm just cleaning up a few things
in my scripts today.
I don't have all the answers yet regarding copyrights. Margaret
Greentree's site seems to
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the input. I've sent email to Margaret (whom I don't know
personally) asking her thoughts about the licensing. I've not yet heard
back from her.
I confess I went with a strong non-commercial clause largely in deference to
her work and the claims on her website. It's a lot
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:08:38PM +0100, Phil Hézaine wrote:
Moreover, there are chorals which aren't changed from the Public Domain.
I've checked some of it against my sources. Well, only a little bit.
And i'm not sure of the data integrity of her typesetting.
Interesting.
Then, why to
Project site now has downloadable archives of PDF and MIDI files at
http://code.google.com/p/solfege-resources/downloads/list
Cheers,
Mike
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I've just committed a first version of LilyPond sources for 404 Bach
chorales at https://solfege-resources.googlecode.com.
The voice notation is extracted from Margaret Greentree's musicXML
files of the chorales at jsbchorales.net. Each file creates PDF and
midi for the full score (typically
30 matches
Mail list logo
