2009/4/22 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
The IR tells you that TextSpanners are created by Dynamic_engraver,
New_dynamic_engraver, and Text_spanner_engraver.
Hmm, it just goes to show that you can't always rely on what the IR
says: only the Text_spanner_engraver creates them. :)
I'll
found in the snippets repository!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextSpanner-at-Score-level--tp23119922p23236720.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On 4/25/09 3:38 PM, -Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
You use the Internals Reference. You find the object you want engraved
under 3.1 All layout objects: 3.1.111 TextSpanner.
The IR tells you that TextSpanners are created by Dynamic_engraver,
Hi Simon (et al.),
kieren was probably copy-pasting and saving time.
Yep.
- how do you find out which contexts and engravers are involved?
over my head.
Me, too! I simply modified the TimeSig example. =)
instructor mode is good... but why FileMaker for heaven's sake? ;)
Great $$,
Hi Frédéric,
- if you have 15 instruments (staffs) you need to add 15
stringendos - is
Here again, no problem because I have it in all individual parts
but the trick would work without it
Précis!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Simon Bailey binabik at gmail.com writes:
- how do you find out which contexts and engravers are involved?
You use the Internals Reference. You find the object you want engraved
under 3.1 All layout objects: 3.1.111 TextSpanner.
The IR tells you that TextSpanners are created by
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
Please ignore this explanation. It is wrong.
Carl
I believe the reason LilyPond can't do this automagically is because
[snip,,,]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
hi frédéric,
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
It half works! Fine for the dashed line but the text is not printed...
Here is an example:
\version 2.12.0
stringendo = { \textSpannerUp \override TextSpanner #'(bound-details
left text) = Stringendo }
\new Score \with { \consists
dammit, i should think a bit more before answering things. TextSpanner
has been moved to the score context, so we need to tell the override
to use the TextSpanner objects in the Score context rather than the
default. change the definition of stringendo to:
stringendo = { \textSpannerUp
dammit, i should think a bit more before answering things. TextSpanner has
been moved to the score context, so we need to tell the override to use the
TextSpanner objects in the Score context rather than the default.
Wonderful, you did it! Thank you very much. The more I use lily, the
more I
On 21 Apr 2009, at 09:11, Frédéric Bron wrote:
dammit, i should think a bit more before answering things.
TextSpanner has
been moved to the score context, so we need to tell the override to
use the
TextSpanner objects in the Score context rather than the default.
Wonderful, you did it!
frédéric,
On 21 Apr 2009, at 09:50, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are all at the
top of the score, not above each StaffGroup.
now i'm at wit's end. my first suggestion would be to just put the
Text_spanner_engraver in the top staff of each
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are all at the
top of the score, not above each StaffGroup.
Frédéric
\version 2.12.0
stringendo = { \textSpannerUp \override StaffGroup.TextSpanner
#'(bound-details left text) = Stringendo }
\new Score
\new StaffGroup \with {
Hi Frédéric:
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are
all at the top of the score, not above each StaffGroup.
Maybe this hint will help you solve the problem:
\version 2.12.2
\layout
{
\context
{
\type Engraver_group
now that's a far more elegant solution than anything i'd ever have
come up with. :) thanks, kieren, i just learnt some new things. :)
regards,
sb
On 21 Apr 2009, at 14:27, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Frédéric:
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are
all at the top of the
Exellent, it is exactly what I was hoping! I am going back to the
documentation to see if I can learn such magic things.
Thanks!
Frédéric
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
frédéric,
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Exellent, it is exactly what I was hoping! I am going back to the
documentation to see if I can learn such magic things.
start in LM 3.3 and then move on to NR 5.1.
regards,
sb
--
Simon Bailey
Oompa Loompa of Science
+43 699 190 631
Hi all,
Frédéric wrote:
Exellent, it is exactly what I was hoping!
Glad to hear that!
I am going back to the documentation to see if I can learn such
magic things.
Bonne chance!
_
Simon wrote:
now that's a far more elegant solution than anything i'd ever have
come up with.
- is
that correct?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextSpanner-at-Score-level--tp23119922p23166180.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On 19 Apr 2009, at 08:08, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Is it possible to have a text spanner at the score level instead at
the Staff level?
I have a tempo indication Stringendo - - - - - which appears at
every line of the conductor score. This is too much. The original
score I am copying has printed it
remove the Text_spanner_engraver from the individual voice contexts and put
it in the score context.
something like this [n.b.: untested]:
\new Score \with {
\consists Text_spanner_engraver
}
\new Staff {
\new Voice \with {
\remove
21 matches
Mail list logo