Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Hello everybody!
In the last weeks, there has been talk on repeating ties in second
endings of repeats automatically. This is a sponsorship under the Small
feature regime, so I would like to put it up for 130 EUR (incl VAT for
EU). Peter Mogensen already agreed
Hello everybody!
In the last weeks, there has been talk on repeating ties in second
endings of repeats automatically. This is a sponsorship under the Small
feature regime, so I would like to put it up for 130 EUR (incl VAT for
EU). Peter Mogensen already agreed to put forth 65 EUR
On Thursday 22 September 2005 11.37, Peter Mogensen wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
why not do something like this?
\new DrumStaff {
\drummode {
\repeat volta 2 { sn4 sn sn sn}
\alternative {
{sn4 sn sn sn }
{\grace s4 sn4 hh2. }
On Friday 23 September 2005 01.19, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
IIRC think I have set the price at EUR 110 for #1 + #2 (incl VAT and/or
transfer costs, depending on where you live.)
Sorry, I'm a bit uncoherent. The point I'm trying to make is that the
Grand Unified
Wouldn't it be possible to use the new support for laissez vibrer
in version 2.7.10, to draw these ties?
/Mats
D Josiah Boothby wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 09:33 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Ties are not normally continued into second endings, but a standard
trick is to add a tie from an
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Define proper.
The above requires you to add the hack to all staves if you need it in
one staff. That's too much trouble for my lilypond use.
- it's future compatible (I have plans to fix the grace note bug).
- with your solution, the tied note is placed slightly to the
Peter Mogensen wrote:
You're right. But the I was trying to make is that if something requires
desing-considerations for a clean solution, then it can be difficult to
find small useful solutions, which together gets you all the way.
I'm not in a position to evaluate whether this is the case,
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to use the new support for laissez vibrer
in version 2.7.10, to draw these ties?
that's exactly the feature I am trying to raise money for.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
On Friday 23 September 2005 10.45, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to use the new support for laissez vibrer
in version 2.7.10, to draw these ties?
That's #1 in Han-Wen's sponsorable solution (see thread
Co-sponsoring Was: Ties in second endings)
--
Erik
Ties are not normally continued into second endings, but a standard
trick is to add a tie from an invisible note. One way is to make
the invisible note a grace note. In that way, it doesn't destroy
the rhythm.
Uh, oh, ugly (the situation, not the idea or your code). Han-Wen,
handling such
Fairchild wrote:
Graham -
Here's a trim-down of the thread, for sticking in the manual, in the section
on ties, or repeats, or both. Edit to suit.
There ought to be a better way that makes the tie more pronounced, but a
simple way eludes me.
- Bruce
Peter Mogensen wrote:
Fairchild wrote:
Graham -
Here's a trim-down of the thread, for sticking in the manual, in the section
on ties, or repeats, or both. Edit to suit.
There ought to be a better way that makes the tie more pronounced, but a
simple way eludes me.
-
Erik Sandberg wrote:
why not do something like this?
\new DrumStaff {
\drummode {
\repeat volta 2 { sn4 sn sn sn}
\alternative {
{sn4 sn sn sn }
{\grace s4 sn4 hh2. }
}
}
}
This is the proper way to do
Citerar Peter Mogensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fairchild wrote:
\version 2.4.6
\layout{ raggedright = ##t }
\score{
\relative c' {
\repeat volta 2 { f g a2 ~ }
\alternative {
{ a4 g2 f4 }
{ \grace{ \hideNotes a4~ } \unHideNotes a g2. }
}}}
No... because this won't work when
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Peter Mogensen wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-09/msg00444.html
for the simple extra work-around that's needed.
Yes... I did read your post.
And as I said in the answer, I've experienced that that solution causes
Bengtsson
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:16 AM
To: Peter Mogensen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Ties in second endings
Peter Mogensen wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
* Ties are not continued into second endings
The standard trick is to add a tie from an invisible note. You can
Title: Message
Mats
-
You must be
right. I recallseeing a third ending inserted with only one staff,
but can't repeat it.
Here's an
example of what happens with a grace note on one of two
staves.
\version
"2.4.6"\layout { raggedright = ##t }\score{ \relative c'
\new Staff { \repeat
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 09:33 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Ties are not normally continued into second endings, but a standard
trick is to add a tie from an invisible note. One way is to make
the invisible note a grace note. In that way, it doesn't destroy
the rhythm.
Uh, oh, ugly (the
D Josiah Boothby wrote:
Not having any income to speak of right now, I may come to regret
mentioning this, but I would be willing to support -- as in co-sponsor
-- a fix to this problem. I don't have much, but it sure would be nice
to be able to rally the support to see ties and slurs resume
Peter Mogensen wrote:
I think a lot of us do...
I hope for a more clean complete solution which also could handle ties
into CODA-jumps.
I guess there's many users which would like such larger features, but do
not have the money to pay for the grand unified solution alone. I hope
Han-Wen could
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
IIRC think I have set the price at EUR 110 for #1 + #2 (incl VAT and/or
transfer costs, depending on where you live.)
Sorry, I'm a bit uncoherent. The point I'm trying to make is that the
Grand Unified Solution should be built from many Small Useful
Solutions.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
IIRC think I have set the price at EUR 110 for #1 + #2 (incl VAT
and/or transfer costs, depending on where you live.)
Sorry, I'm a bit uncoherent. The point I'm trying to make is that the
Grand Unified Solution should be built from many
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I hope you know how to fix it, namely to insert a \grace{s4} in the
beginning of the second ending of all other voices. Example:
[snip]
The other alternative that is often used is to fiddle with the
durations, as in the following example, but then you either get
the
by making it slightly longer.
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mats Bengtsson
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:16 AM
To: Peter Mogensen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Ties in second endings
Peter
On 21-Sep-05, at 4:25 AM, Fairchild wrote:
Thanks. Your two alternatives should make the docs, maybe Tips and
Tricks.
Well, you know how to do that. You can add it to the LSR or the
lilypond wiki,
or write some text and copy the example and send it to me for inclusion
in
the manual.
Title: Message
Graham -
Here's a trim-down of the thread, for sticking in the manual,
in the section on ties, or repeats, or both. Edit to suit.
There ought to be a better way that makes the tie more
pronounced, but a simple way eludes me.
- Bruce
Ties
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
* Ties are not continued into second endings
The standard trick is to add a tie from an invisible note. You can
find several examples in the mailing list archives.
I did that.
But this is also one of the examples where the hack doesn't play well
with the entire score.
27 matches
Mail list logo
