Am 30.08.18 um 20:02 schrieb ptoye:
I seem to have solved it by tweaking the Y-offset. But it's a bit odd: if I
change the offset by 0.0 it moves the text position up - I'd have thought it
should be unchanged. Also, it doesn't matter if I use ^ or _ to position the
text if I tweak the offset.
I seem to have solved it by tweaking the Y-offset. But it's a bit odd: if I
change the offset by 0.0 it moves the text position up - I'd have thought it
should be unchanged. Also, it doesn't matter if I use ^ or _ to position the
text if I tweak the offset.
Now, if only the internals manual gave
As well as dynamics the dynamics staff also contains other indications such
as "marcato" "staccato" etc. I suppose I could define them as dynamics, but
it seems a bit silly!
Is there a reason that the vertical alignment of text isn't the same as that
for dynamics?
--
Sent from:
Am 30.08.18 um 13:42 schrieb Peter Toye:
I'm trying to use the dynamics staff in a piano piece and mix straight
dynamics with text. But the text isn't vertically aligned with the
dynamic symbols. In the example below the second indication is below the
first - I'd like them at the same level.
I'm trying to use the dynamics staff in a piano piece and mix straight dynamics
with text. But the text isn't vertically aligned with the dynamic symbols. In
the example below the second indication is below the first - I'd like them at
the same level. I can't find anythin in the manuals to
