Staff {
>> <<
>> \time 6/8
>> \clef bass
>> \new Voice = "a" {
>> \voiceFour
>> %\time 6/8 \clef bass
>> \appoggiatura c,8 c2. \appoggiatura c,8 c2.
>> }
>> \new Voice = "b" {
>>
: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Appoggiatura in bass clef at start of piece
Thanks, Harm,
Sorry, I seemed to have missed out the most important part of the challenge!
Apologies. This is a simplified extract of the lower staff from the start of a
two staff piano arrangement
of the second voice that causes the additional
treble clef to appear, with a single voice there is no problem. But
when you add a second…
\version "2.22.2"
\new Staff {
<<
\time 6/8
\clef bass
\new Voice = "a" {
\voiceFour
%\time 6/8 \clef bass
clef to
appear, with a single voice there is no problem. But when you add a second…
\version "2.22.2"
\new Staff {
<<
\time 6/8
\clef bass
\new Voice = "a" {
\voiceFour
%\time 6/8 \clef bass
\appoggia
% \clef bass
> \new Voice = "a" {
> \voiceFour
> \time 6/8 \clef bass \appoggiatura c,8 c1 \appoggiatura c,8 c1
> }
> \new Voice = "b" {
> \voiceThree
> \grace s8 e1 \grace s8 e1
> }
> >>
> }
&
Hi,
I’m wondering if there is a better way of writing this code:
\version "2.22.2"
\new Staff {
<<
% \time 6/8
% \clef bass
\new Voice = "a" {
\voiceFour
\time 6/8 \clef
l Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now
> > and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet.
> >
> > I'm having a problem correctly displaying appoggiatura that exists
> > inside a repeat volta.
> >
> > The problem: The appoggiatura appears in a
f
> > "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now
> > and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet.
> >
> > I'm having a problem correctly displaying appoggiatura that exists
> > inside a repeat volta.
> >
> >
Kenneth Wolcott writes:
> Hi;;
>
> I'm trying to engrave the 8notes.com's Voice+Piano arrangement of
> "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". I decided to skip the lyrics for now
> and replace the corresponding notes with a trumpet.
>
> I'm having a problem co
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:45 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Have a look at the recent thread
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2021-07/msg00012.html
>
> Workaround:
>
> \version "2.22.1"
>
> \new Voice \relative c' {
>$(add-grace-property 'Voice 'Slur 'direction UP)
>
David Kastrup writes:
> Knute Snortum writes:
>
>> I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
>> Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
>> piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
Le 04/08/2021 à 02:18, Knute Snortum a écrit :
I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
notes work fine. MWE:
%%%
\version "2
Knute Snortum writes:
> I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
> Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
> piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
> notes work fine. MWE:
>
> %%%
I've run into what I think is a bug (and I couldn't find it in gitlab
Issues). If an acciaccatura or appoggiatura is the first note in a
piece, a \slurUp is not honored (it stays a down slur). Subsequent
notes work fine. MWE:
%%%
\version "2.23.3"
\relative c' {
\acciaccatura { \slur
> >
> >
> > On 1/29/21 10:48 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> > > Hello;
> > >
> > >I have two (only two at this time!) misunderstandings on how to
> > > properly engrave ornamental notes. The grace (?) notes are slurred
> > > (so not a grac
ginning of a bar.
> >
> > Now the syntax: \grace { note(s) } followed by regular notes. This
> > makes sense because the appoggiatura syntax and the acciaccatura have
> > only one note allowed prior to the "regular" notes.
>
> \acciaccatura{ note1 note2, etc. } wil
by regular notes. This
makes sense because the appoggiatura syntax and the acciaccatura have
only one note allowed prior to the "regular" notes.
\acciaccatura{ note1 note2, etc. } will allow as many notes as you need.
Paul
But the grace notes are not slurred?
Why does the time sig
the appoggiatura syntax and the acciaccatura have
only one note allowed prior to the "regular" notes.
But the grace notes are not slurred?
Why does the time signature get displayed after the "grace" notes as
well is the beginning of the staff where it should be?
I'm looking in L
Hi Harm,
thank you for pointing me to that (and actually now I recall having seen
this hack some day).
Am 18.01.19 um 21:14 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Am Fr., 18. Jan. 2019 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
appoggiatura
On 1/18/19, Thomas Morley wrote:
> you could try to use David K's cheat:
Neat! I’ve added it to the LSR, and also tagged it as doc:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1083
V.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Harm,
Thanks. I tend to adjust rest positions manually anyway, so that's not an
issue for me personally. With a bar full of notes it also usually looks
pretty good.
Andrew
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 12:20, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
> Spacing is a little off. The R1 is not really centered:
>
>
little off. The R1 is not really centered:
{
R1
\appoggiatura { \bar "" d''8 \bar "|" } c''4 r2.
}
That's what I remember directly, not sure whether there is more.
Cheers,
Harm
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Thomas Morley
I should add that this works for grace notes also, which is actually what I
use the technique for.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
gt; {
> R1
> %% default
> \appoggiatura d''8 c''4 r2.
> %% cheated
> \appoggiatura { \bar "" d''8 \bar "|" } c''4 r2.
> }
>
> It has it's own drawbacks, though.
>
>
___
lilypond-user mailing lis
Am Fr., 18. Jan. 2019 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
>
> Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
> appoggiatura (or other grace notes) *before* the barline? I know that
> usually one is pointed to \afterGrace to achieve something like that but
Is there any convenient and semantically acceptable way of engraving an
appoggiatura (or other grace notes) *before* the barline? I know that
usually one is pointed to \afterGrace to achieve something like that but
that seems semantically problematic. I produced the attached image using
Urs
Am 14.01.19 um 13:08 schrieb Urs Liska:
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
A client requests me to shorten
On 2019-01-14 4:08 am, Urs Liska wrote:
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
A client requests me to shorten the slurs
Urs,
Forgot something
{
\slurUp \stemDown \grace d''4 (c'')
\stemUp
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Urs Liska
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:08 AM
To: lilypond-user
Urs,
Perhaps
{
\slurUp \stemDown \grace d''4 (c'')
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Urs Liska
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:08 AM
To: lilypond-user
Subject
In an appoggiatura with the main note having the stem downwards the
appoggiatura's slur will cross the stem, see the first of the two
instances in this example:
{
\appoggiatura d''4 c''
\appoggiatura d'4 c'
}
A client requests me to shorten the slurs so not to cross the stem
Maurits Lamers <maurits.lam...@hku.nl> writes:
> One of my students came to me with something peculiar with
> accacciatura and appoggiatura when used as the first item in a score
> with multiple staffs.
Issue 34.
--
David Kastrup
__
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:18:42AM -0700, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Maurits,
>
>
>
> This is a known glitch. A “dummy” acciaccatura or appoggiatura must be
> added to all other voices. See below
\grace of the same value will do (it's easier to type).
Paul
>
>
Maurits,
This is a known glitch. A "dummy" acciaccatura or appoggiatura must be added
to all other voices. See below
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Maurits Lamers
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:12 AM
To: Lilypond-Us
Hi all,
One of my students came to me with something peculiar with accacciatura and
appoggiatura when used as the first item in a score with multiple staffs.
I tried to find any obvious errors in his code, but I couldn't find anything. I
managed to create a minimal working example, included
Encountering this bug for the first time is a right of passage. It will
probably not be fixed in our lifetimes.
Congratulations, you are now a Lilyponder!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/appoggiatura-problem-tp192328p192353.html
Sent from the User
Many tahnks! Have understood the problem.
Regards
Am 07.07.2016 um 17:42 schrieb David Kastrup:
bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net> writes:
I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
that at
bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net> writes:
> I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
> appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
> that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time
> definition. in the
I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an
appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile
that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time
definition. in the second measure/bar it is not.
There is also a strange treble clef
Luca,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Luca Danieli [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n178112...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Hello Lilypond-ers again!
How can I write an appoggiatura, which goes into an acciaccatura, and then
into the main note?
More or less this is what I thought:
appoggiatura
Hello Lilypond-ers again!
How can I write an appoggiatura, which goes into an acciaccatura, and then into
the main note?More or less this is what I thought:
appoggiatura fis16\pp { \acciaccatura fis 8 fis2\mp }
Luca
these carefully, the
mid-point resting between or crossing the line where a the notehead of the
auxiliary note would land (even providing them with ledger lines).
For now, I'm notating these with smaller-sized appoggiatura 8ths, to at least
provide some contrast with the regular appoggiaturas attached
I'm typesetting BWV 1055, which includes these so-called nachschlags (or
passing appoggiaturas, accents)
They can appear coming down or up to the following note (see attached).
These are explained here:
http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/henry/music/bachnotation.htm#passinga
How to
Hi Javier,
it's probably not what you are looking for and your case is perhaps easier to
solve. But there might
be ideas to take from this post:
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/adding-ornamentations-to-note-heads-part-1/
Just because the symbol looks similar.
Cheers,
Joram
On 29 Nov 2014, at 23:19, Javier Ruiz-Alma jav...@ruiz-alma.com wrote:
I'm typesetting BWV 1055, which includes these so-called nachschlags (or
passing appoggiaturas, accents)
They can appear coming down or up to the following note (see attached).
These are explained here:
I'm running Lilypond 2.16.2 inside Frescobaldi 2.0.10 on Fedora 19.
This gives two 'C' time signatures, one before and one after the
appoggiatura:
\version 2.16
\book {
\score {
\new Staff = treble
\new Voice = treble1
\key c\major
\time 4/4
\relative c''' {
{ \appoggiatura { g16
the
appoggiatura:
\version 2.16
\book {
\score {
\new Staff = treble
\new Voice = treble1
\key c\major
\time 4/4
\relative c''' {
{ \appoggiatura { g16 ([a] } g1) } \\ { g e1} |
}
\layout {
}
}
}
If I comment out the \time 4/4, I get only one 'C', in the usual place.
If I change
.
Now, in my first bar (which has an appoggiatura), the key signature shows
up on the third beat (literally 'on': it's superimposed over the notes),
even though I have the spacers everywhere. This snippet shows most of the
problems, though not the superimposition, and the key signature comes after
a \transpose c des {} around
every voice and changed the \key in my \global to des\major.
Frederick,
Don't change the key to des\major. \transpose c des {} will do it for you.
Now, in my first bar (which has an appoggiatura), the key signature shows up
on the third beat (literally 'on': it's
voices in
a piece with a single command rather than putting an individual \transpose
on each voice.)
Also, the snippet is quite simplified; I really do need the two-voice
construct. The actual treble clef's first measure is
{ \appoggiatura { g16 ([a] } \voiceOne g4) (c8 g) a4 (b) } \\ {
\appoggiatura
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:16:17PM -0500, Frederick Bartlett wrote:
Patrick,
Are you sure \transpose changes the key signature? It doesn't work for me,
unless the \key is inside the \transpose, which won't generally be the
case, since I put \key in a \global ... or is there some easier way
treble clef's first measure is
{ \appoggiatura { g16 ([a] } \voiceOne g4) (c8 g) a4 (b) } \\ {
\appoggiatura { s8 }g e2 f c4 g d}
where the \voiceOne is need to prevent warnings about too many clashing note
columns (which I also don't understand, but it does work, more or less).
Hi,
how
. Re:Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura? (David Rogers)
4. feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
(Kieren MacMillan)
5. Uneven note spacing (Andrew Bernard)
6. Re:feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
(Marc Hohl)
7. LSR preview broken? (Werner
line (Richard Shann)
3. Re:Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura? (David Rogers)
4. feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
(Kieren MacMillan)
[...]
Sending from an iPod is _no_ reason for quoting the entire traffic of a
whole day without editing, reducing the repeated
c'
{ \clef treble
\time 6/8
\key b \major
ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais
gisis ais]}
{dis4 b8}
\new Voice
{\stemUp
\once \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\once \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
\times 1/2
{dis8
\major
ais'4.\p \once \override Slur #'stencil = ##f \appoggiatura {b8[\( ais gisis
ais]}
{dis4 b8}
\new Voice
{\stemUp
\once \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\once \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
\times 1/2
{dis8 \teeny d cis c
Good Day!
A piece begins with an anacrusis - see attached file without.ly. When the
g is notated as an appoggiatura to the f - see attached file with.ly -
some dreck appears.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=183 states that the grace should appear
after the \partial. Placing
Le 03/06/2013 17:32, Mark Stephen Mrotek disait :
Good Day!
A piece begins with an anacrusis – see attached file “without.ly.” When
the “g” is notated as an appoggiatura to the “f” – see attached file
“with.ly” – some dreck appears.
Both hands don't have the same duration since one of them
Greetings -
I'm running Ly 2.16.2 under Win7.
I'm trying to reproduce the appoggiatura below. I've looked in the Notation
Reference, the Snippet Repository, and the mailing list archives, and I
haven't found anything that helps. Can anyone help me with this?
I appreciate your time and attention
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Ralph Palmer palmer.r.vio...@gmail.comwrote:
Greetings -
I'm running Ly 2.16.2 under Win7.
I'm trying to reproduce the appoggiatura below. I've looked in the
Notation Reference, the Snippet Repository, and the mailing list archives,
and I haven't found
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Andrew Bernard
andrew.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
Don't know if this works in 2.16, but here you are:
\version 2.17.14
treble = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\time 3/4
s2 g,8( a) |
bes d2 b d4
}
bass = \relative c {
\clef bass
\time
On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd like
to move it to be above the notes.
If you mean the slur, use \once \override Slur
Nick Payne-3 wrote
On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
like
to move it to be above the notes.
If you mean the slur, use \once
Nick Payne-3 wrote
On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
like
to move it to be above the notes.
If you mean the slur, use \once
, 2012 at 8:02 PM, SoundsFromSound
soundsfromso...@gmail.comwrote:
Nick Payne-3 wrote
On 29/11/12 18:32, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above
the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd
like
-notes/style better in LilyPond.
I guess, perhaps I could just leave the slur as is in my original post and
just tweak the final output in Inkscape? No? Not ideal, but maybe?
Ben
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Appoggiatura
offsets) (list?)
#{
\once \override Slur.control-points = #(alter-slur-curve offsets)
#})
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis,
}
___
lilypond-user mailing
)
#})
And the above definition would only work with that new version. But
wouldn't it be equivalent to the \shape macro applied as
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis,
}
\shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0
-curve offsets)
#})
And the above definition would only work with that new version. But
wouldn't it be equivalent to the \shape macro applied as
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis,
}
\shape
?)
#{
\once \override Slur.control-points = #(alter-slur-curve offsets)
#})
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis,
}
Those are nice functions. In this case, a simpler alternative could be
to use stemDown
-points = #(alter-slur-curve offsets)
#})
And the above definition would only work with that new version. But
wouldn't it be equivalent to the \shape macro applied as
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shapeSlur #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) \appoggiatura f8 fis
Am 29.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Nick Payne:
\version 2.17.6
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\appoggiatura f8 fis,
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) Slur \appoggiatura f'8 fis,
\once \override Slur #'direction
2012/11/30 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de:
Am 29.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Nick Payne:
\version 2.17.6
\relative c'' {
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\appoggiatura f8 fis,
\once \override Slur #'direction = #UP
\shape #'(0.7 -2.5 0.5 -2.3 0.3 -3 0 -4) Slur \appoggiatura f'8 fis
Hello,
Is there a way to flip the grace note/appoggiatura marking so it's above the
note, instead of where it is now? It's all messy and overlapping; I'd like
to move it to be above the notes.
Coming from Sibelius, I know it's easy to just hit a key and flip a
slur-style marking, but I'm
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double bar
line as the D#. What I wrote looks something like what is below (at the
end). As you can see I've put the volta repeats only into the top part. Up
until now it's worked
On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double bar
line as the D#. What I wrote looks something like what is below (at the
end). As you can see I've put
Damn. Really should have seen that. Thanks.
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 12 December 2011 00:30, George_ georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32957263/Untitled.jpg
What I want is for the appoggiatura to be on the same side of the double
bar
line as the D#. What I wrote
.
The first note of each measure has an appoggiatura.
The problem: The first measure displays stems going down when they
should be going up. Second measure (and subsequent measures if I make a
longer score) show stems going in the proper direction. So this problem
is limited to the first measure
the \staccato, only it takes a
quarter of the note's value by default, not a half.
3. Appoggiatura. Unfortunately, articulate's \appoggiatura doesn't
quite work (at least for me with Lilypond version 2.12.2). For example,
\include articulate.ly
\articulate {\appoggiatura d8 c4}
doesn't give
On 29.09.2009, at 16:14, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello
Stems are going the wrong direction on the first measure of a score
when a grace note is present.
This is a known issue with graceMusic. \voiceOne has to be re-set
after the grace note.
Subsequent measures do not show this problem.
an
acciaccatura?
We're not in disagreement about what the appoggiatura's meant to do :-).
We both agree that the output from
\appoggiatura d8 c4
should be like
d8 c8
However, what happens with the unpatched articulate is instead like
d16 c8
The new length of the d is half of the old
the \staccato, only it takes a
quarter of the note's value by default, not a half.
3. Appoggiatura. Unfortunately, articulate's \appoggiatura doesn't
quite work. For example,
\include articulate.ly
\articulate {\appoggiatura d8 c4}
doesn't give quaver to both the d and the c. Instead
experience.
Iain 2. Staccatissimo. I've got a simple patch to add
Iain \staccatissimo. Nothing fancy: it's implemented just like the
Iain \staccato, only it takes a quarter of the note's value by
Iain default, not a half.
Good Oh.
Iain 3. Appoggiatura. Unfortunately, articulate's \appoggiatura
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although there's too
much horizontal space between the appoggiatura and the quarter note
If it is laid out with another
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below)
When this staff is converted, the layout looks good although
are you suggesting Staff 2's content need be altered?
Please see the Known Issues and Warnings in the Notation Reference, section
1.2.6 under Grace notes. This issue is explained there.
Carl
Thanks
Nick Didkovsky
James E. Bailey wrote:
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff
there.
Carl
Thanks
Nick Didkovsky
James E. Bailey wrote:
Have you added the spacer appoggiatura to the other staff?
On 19.09.2009, at 21:07, Nick Didkovsky wrote:
Hello,
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong?
I have a staff where the first note has an appoggiatura (see below
, in the attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out,
then the stems follow how they're supposed to. Is this a bug or a
super-special feature of graceMusic that I just didn't know about?
It seems that the grace note commands are yet another example of a
command that messes up ooiceOne/voiceTwo settings
James E. Bailey Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:51 PM
Wow, thanks. With that bit of information, I could change my code
appropriately.
\version 2.11.57
{
\relative {
\voiceOne
\appoggiatura e'
\voiceOne
f4 e d c b a g f
}
}
Can this be mentioned somewhere
Oddly, in the attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out,
then the stems follow how they're supposed to. Is this a bug or a
super-special feature of graceMusic that I just didn't know about?
\version 2.11.57
{
\relative {
\voiceOne
\appoggiatura e'
f4 e d c b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb James E. Bailey:
Oddly, in the attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out,
then the stems follow how they're supposed to. Is this a bug or a
super-special feature of graceMusic that I just didn't know
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb James E. Bailey:
Oddly, in the attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out,
then the stems follow how they're supposed to. Is this a bug or a
super-special feature of graceMusic
Wow, thanks. With that bit of information, I could change my code
appropriately.
\version 2.11.57
{
\relative {
\voiceOne
\appoggiatura e'
\voiceOne
f4 e d c b a g f
}
}
Can this be mentioned somewhere in the docs?
Am 27.08.2008 um 22:32 schrieb Reinhold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb Daniel Hulme:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb James E. Bailey:
Oddly, in the attached code, if the appoggiatura is commented out
All the problems you see are symptoms of the same bug, which
seems to be solved in version 2.7.x (the only remaining problem
in 2.7.x is that you have to explicitly add a \voiceOne or \stemUp
between the appoggiatura and the main note, for some reason.
/Mats
liang seng wrote:
To whom it may
To whom it may concern,
Hi, I have an interesting problem here. I've included the files example.ly
and example.pdf file your reference.
On the 1st staff, the notes and the polyphony are what I intended to do.
Now, when I try to add an appoggiatura to the quarter note g, this is what
happened
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trent Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Beginning a piece with tuplets with a grace note or
appoggiatura
In addition to Erik's answer, you may want to take a look at
section 8.4.1 Polymetric
this is what the composer is doing setting the time signature as
12/8 so the players wouldn'tbe overwhelmed with triplets
everywhere.
But there is a problem with beginning the first
note of the system with either a grace note or appoggiatura. I get the first bar
with the grace or appogiatura
-signature at the beginning... since essentially this is what the
composer is doing setting the time signature as 12/8 so the players wouldn't
be overwhelmed with triplets everywhere.
But there is a problem with beginning the first note of the system with
either a grace note or appoggiatura. I
.
But there is a problem with beginning the first note of the system
with either a grace note or appoggiatura. I get the first bar with the
grace or appogiatura but then there seems to be a restart of the
systems and the resest of the music continues.
I get the same problem if change the notes to triplet groups
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
