On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:18:57 Paul Scott wrote:
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
Instead, what one typically wants is bar numbering at 1, 5, 9, 13, ...
Even more accurately, at 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
*If* it matches the phrases. I absolutely *hate* reading music numbered
every 5
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:18:57 Paul Scott wrote:
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
Instead, what one typically wants is bar numbering at 1, 5, 9, 13, ...
Even more accurately, at 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
*If* it matches the phrases. I absolutely
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 20:55:13 Paul Scott wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:18:57 Paul Scott wrote:
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
I don't even consider that an exception to my comment.
Better and better. I wasn't disagreeing either, really.
DaveA :-)
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
Instead, what one typically wants is bar numbering at 1, 5, 9, 13, ...
Even more accurately, at 5, 9, 13, 17, ...
*If* it matches the phrases. I absolutely *hate* reading music numbered
every 5 bars which is typical of some band music especially when
