Hello all,
A large proportion of my compositions and arrangements include voice. There are
certain (one might almost say “many”) things about Lily’s vocal engraving
engine that need fixing. Hence I was very excited when Janek took that part of
Lily on during his Google Summer of Code stint.
have to precede the addition of feature X. Bounties could
end up complicating the logical development of Lilypond if they end up causing
piecemeal development.
+1
I think that the bounty model for special features won't work (yet). The
bounites drop in from time to
time, and it is not clearly
:
http://old.nabble.com/Bounties-%28was%3A-User-vs-Developer%29-tp33197679p33199937.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
- about which I know nothing- would have to precede the addition
of feature X. Bounties could end up complicating the logical
development of Lilypond if they end up causing piecemeal development.
+1
I think that the bounty model for special features won't work
(yet). The bounites drop in from
Am 25.01.2012 11:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de writes:
[...]
I don't know about legal and organizational issues, but what about a
optional lilypond usage fee?
fee has a bad ring to it.
Ok, this was not the appropriate word - replace it with whatever you
think is
, but groundwork U V and W- about which I
know nothing- would have to precede the addition of feature X. Bounties
could end up complicating the logical development of Lilypond if they end up
causing piecemeal development.
+1
I think that the bounty model for special features won't work (yet
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
It is quite possible that the Lilypond team doesn't want to have to
set up accounting and disbursement mechanisms, however. There are
some headaches and legalities that would be involved which might be
more trouble than they are worth.
That is the
have to precede the addition
of feature X. Bounties could end up complicating the logical
development of Lilypond if they end up causing piecemeal development.
There certainly is a case for bounties as well. Bounties _tend_ to be
raller on the smallish side compared with actual development efforts
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Ok, let's take the guitar string bend stuff as an example: I think
that Lilypond would benefit *a lot* if this feature were implemented.
Tuxguitar can export .ly files, but without the bend stuff.
A skilled programmer should be able to implement this for,
I think that bounties will never have significant impact on Lily
development if we don't organize them. It's because writing code is
very expensive ($200-500 for a nontrivial patch?) compared to money
average user can spend (few can afford $100 i think).
I am serious: there are at least 20 issues
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I think that bounties will never have significant impact on Lily
development if we don't organize them. It's because writing code is
very expensive ($200-500 for a nontrivial patch?) compared to money
average user can spend (few can afford $100
. Bounties could
end up complicating the logical development of Lilypond if they end up causing
piecemeal development.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 06/17/2010 03:35 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
The main obstacle, of course, being the international essence of the
project, whereas non-profit organisations, bank accounts, etc. are
usually conceived in a nation-centric perspective.
What are the particular problems there? Is it just
The donation idea is pretty good. That't pretty ok with GNU philosophy BTW.
Think of the Free Software Foundation. Ardour has a way of doing this, it
has one main developers and it seems that who contribute more to the project
have more priority in the suggestion of requested features. Of course
Op donderdag 17-06-2010 om 15:35 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
As I mentioned in the other thread, there are plans to build such an
organization in France, from scratch (another possibility would be to
revive the (Netherlands-based?) LilyPond foundation, but we'd need
more
, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
[...]
I am considering to offer commercial support and may be able to do
that on a part-time basis. However, working on two bounties has
illustrated that bounty work can be quite tricky.
Indeed; there's almost no relationship between the amount of work
required
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
(I wouldn't surely be the ideal person for founding a lilypond
users group), I am willing to spend a fee, say $50 a year, for
supporting the lilypond development. If there are 99 people more
(and I think there are a lot more!),
Hi.
I thought one could order pieces of improvment (it's been a long time
since I read something on it...). The idea is : I pay for my personnel
need, and the improvment is put back in the community. This question
strikes me because I've just beginning to set up shop as an editor, and
I've
If you haven't already, have a look at Ardour's subscription page
http://ardour.org/why_subscribe
This may be a viable answer. At one time, I was a subscriber,
contributing $4.00US per month via automated paypal withdrawl. $4.00/mo
is pretty painless when you lump it in with your other
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Stocker
dstoc...@notesettersinc.com wrote:
I think
LilyPond has a dedicated base of users who would be glad to contribute
resources in a concrete and structured way. It might be worth considering.
I agree. Paying a 'subscription' for Lilypond usage would
2010/6/17 Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Stocker
dstoc...@notesettersinc.com wrote:
I think
LilyPond has a dedicated base of users who would be glad to contribute
resources in a concrete and structured way. It might be worth
considering.
so +1
The question is : how is it used, what for, and by who ? It may sound an
odd question, but I can assure you that in France, such questions of
transparency ARE NOT that obvious. I think each list shouild have its
contributors ?
Cheers
JM
Marek Klein a écrit :
2010/6/17 Christ van
2010/6/17 Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com:
Absolutely. That's why I've always said that we should have something
like a bounty thermometer (such as the one they use for Blender's
open movies IIRC, or http://haikuware.com/bounties/ as well).
Agree.
At this time there is nothing
bounties
I am considering to offer commercial support and may be able to do
that on a part-time basis. However, working on two bounties has
illustrated that bounty work can be quite tricky.
Indeed; there's almost no relationship between the amount of work
required and the amount of money being
Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Subject: bounties
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org, LilyPond Development
lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Message-ID: 20100615191934.gb10...@sapphire
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:25:27PM +0200
Something like the Gnome bounties system perhaps? See -
http://www.gnome.org/bounties/index.html for details.
Jamie
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:02 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Thursday 30 June 2005 13.14, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
If you're willing to pay for the development, I could implement
26 matches
Mail list logo
