Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve

Hi Jean, Le jeu. 10 nov. 2022 à 11:23, Jean Abou Samra a écrit : ... > This is nice! Just a thought: why use after-line-breaking > here? ... Bad habit? Respond without thinking long enough? Too proud it'd worked? Missing knowledge? All?... Yeah, probably all... > This is the sort of thing

Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve

tending/callback-functions) So, I'd do: \version "2.22.2" oldTie = \once \override Tie.stencil =   #(grob-transformer     'stencil     (lambda (grob default-stencil)   (let* ((dir (ly:grob-property grob 'direction)) (caesura-stencil   (grob-interpret-mar

Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve

Perol-Schneider Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 9:31 PM To: Andrew Bernard Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve Hi Andrew, Hi Dirck, Le jeu. 10 nov. 2022 à 02:40, Andrew Bernard mailto:andrew.bern...@mailbox.org>> a écrit : Never say an

Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve

agy wrote: > ... > I am trying to notate ties with a double-slash (caesura) along the curve. > > ... How about: \version "2.22.0" oldTie = \once \override Tie.after-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob) (let* ((stencil (ly:tie::print grob)) (dir (l

Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve

it - fairly straightforward and very common occurrence. Andrew On 10/11/2022 12:02 pm, Dirck Nagy wrote: Hi all I am trying to notate ties with a double-slash (caesura) along the curve. This is to indicate a tie in the original manuscript which is technically unplayable.

Re: use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

Hi Valentin; This is very nice, thank you. Lovely. Ken On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 12:04 AM Valentin Petzel wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > I’d argue than in this example the Caesura is placed in a weird way, so we > need to tell Lilypond to actually do it this way. That can be achieved

Re: use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

Hi Ken, I’d argue than in this example the Caesura is placed in a weird way, so we need to tell Lilypond to actually do it this way. That can be achieved by something as simple as caesura = \tweak text \markup\musicglyph "scripts.caesura.straight" \tweak outside-staff-pr

Re: use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

to use gregorian.ly to get a caesura. > Why do you think there is? > > See > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-curves#breath-marks > > > On 01/05/2022 06:38, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > Hi; > > > > I see that the us

Re: use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

help. Thanks, Ken On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 6:47 AM Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > > I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", > > according to the Notation Reference. > > > > But doing this completely screws up all the

Re: use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

Hi Ken, I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference. But doing this completely screws up all the default display Lilypond code that I've been using all along. I'm trying to engrave "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", w

Re: use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

AFAICS there is no requirement to use gregorian.ly to get a caesura.  Why do you think there is? See https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-curves#breath-marks On 01/05/2022 06:38, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: Hi; I see that the use of \caesura requires

use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference

Hi; I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly", according to the Notation Reference. But doing this completely screws up all the default display Lilypond code that I've been using all along. I'm trying to engrave "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", w

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

On 2020-09-20 1:58 pm, Paul McKay wrote: Aha! That will probably also explain why its staff is that of the following note. When the voice I'm writing changes staff I'd like to tell the breathe mark to stay in the bass staff which is the staff of the preceding note but haven't figured out how

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

Aha! That will probably also explain why its staff is that of the following note. When the voice I'm writing changes staff I'd like to tell the breathe mark to stay in the bass staff which is the staff of the preceding note but haven't figured out how to make it happen. Paul McKay On Sun, 20 Sep

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

Hi David, >> 1. I haven't investigated, but \breathe must (e.g.) be attached to a >> <> or something, so that it has "its own moment". > > No? > > \breathe is not a post-event. It's a standalone event of zero duration, > so its moment of time is that of whatever follows, not what precedes it.

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi Andrew, > >> Ah. It's a matter of positioning. That is not entirely obvious to me. >> Seems slightly different to how other overrides work. > > 1. I haven't investigated, but \breathe must (e.g.) be attached to a > <> or something, so that it has "its own moment".

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

Hi Andrew, > Ah. It's a matter of positioning. That is not entirely obvious to me. > Seems slightly different to how other overrides work. 1. I haven't investigated, but \breathe must (e.g.) be attached to a <> or something, so that it has "its own moment". 2. Whenever I find an override that

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

Ah. It's a matter of positioning. That is not entirely obvious to me. Seems slightly different to how other overrides work. And as a follow up question related to this positioning matter, why can't one use \once for the override? At least, doing that does not work for me. Andrew On Sun, 20 Sep

Re: Breathing mark and caesura

Hi Andrew, > I can change \breathe into a caesura by following the NR. But how can > I revert it? The following does not do it. As usual, I am missing something. This works for me: \version "2.21.2" { c''4 \breathe c'' \override BreathingSign.text = \markup {

Breathing mark and caesura

I can change \breathe into a caesura by following the NR. But how can I revert it? The following does not do it. As usual, I am missing something. Andrew %= \version "2.21.6" { c''4 \breathe c'' \override BreathingSign.text = \markup { \

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

Hi All, With the understanding that this is long before the age of standardisation of anything, and one author's table of ornaments is not necessarily what another composer would have, and performers would naturally have taken great liberties with interpretation of signs. Not until 19c did

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

Following Aaron's formidable example, I've done some minor modifications. Just a matter of taste, of course…: - straight lines (flags.ugrace) to more resemble the original symbols and make them more distinguishable from a caesura. - "downgraded" the syntax to make it all work with t

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

On 2019-07-09 7:34 pm, Aaron Hill wrote: On 2019-07-09 7:11 pm, Eby Mani wrote: Many Thanks Torsten, exactly the thing i was looking for. Now, how to do those "Forefall" and "the shake turned" symbols in lilypond. any snippets ?. You could do something like this: \version "2.19.83"

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

On 2019-07-09 7:11 pm, Eby Mani wrote: Many Thanks Torsten, exactly the thing i was looking for. Now, how to do those "Forefall" and "the shake turned" symbols in lilypond. any snippets ?. You could do something like this: \version "2.19.83" forefall-markup = \markup \rotate #'-30

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

As "Insert Image" doesn't seem to have worked, here's a PNG file (hopefully) prelleur_treatise_ornaments_1731.png Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

Hi Eby et al., In Peter Prelleur's 1731 treatise "The Modern Musick-Master", there are some hints about keyboard ornamentation in the section "Of the Graces:". And, lo and behold, that seems to clarify the issue, indeed: HTH, Torsten -- Sent from:

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

Hello Andrew, This is by William Hine, before 1750, the title simply says Voluntary. I have read somewhere how to interpret English music written before 1750. I'm not sure if inverted-mordent/trill were written like caesura in those days. If you look at the sample, there are turns and trill

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.

Hello eby_km, Well they are definitely keyboard ornaments. It would be helpful if you could say what the piece is and who is the composer and date? There are countless non-standard ornaments in 18c - this was well before the stage of standardization of notation. Not caesura, that much is certain

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

That works quite nicely. Thank you! I had been using \include satb.ly, so I had to recreate the \score {}, but it was good practice to combine \lyrics and multiple parts to one staff. ~Conor On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi Conor, In

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

Conor Cook wrote Monday, February 16, 2015 5:14 PM I had been using \include satb.ly, so I had to recreate the \score {}, but it was good practice to combine \lyrics and multiple parts to one staff. Perhaps you had other reasons for recreating the \score { }, but if it was just to add a

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

Conor Cook wrote Is it possible to place a caesura, contained in a rehearsal mark, over every staff of a system (like in a choral score, since parts will not be extracted)? I know that this is not how rehearsal marks are supposed to work, so is there another way to achieve

Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

Is it possible to place a caesura, contained in a rehearsal mark, over every staff of a system (like in a choral score, since parts will not be extracted)? I know that this is not how rehearsal marks are supposed to work, so is there another way to achieve this? In an archived thread, David

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

That is beautiful, both in its coding simplicity and in the final product! Thank you! ~Conor -- Forwarded message -- From: tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Cc: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:38:12 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

Hi Conor, That is beautiful, both in its coding simplicity and in the final product! Unless you’re planning to have *all* of your marks (including \mark \default, etc.) above every staff — which is not a usual engraving convention — why not just put the caesura in a global variable

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

Kieren MacMillan wrote Hi Conor, That is beautiful, both in its coding simplicity and in the final product! Unless you’re planning to have *all* of your marks (including \mark \default, etc.) above every staff — which is not a usual engraving convention — why not just put the caesura

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

Hi Conor, In the particular score I am working on, I have only this one mark (it's about 30 measures long total). What would an example of your suggestion look like, as I can see your concern applying down the road. Snippet included below. 1. In both scores, the breath mark appears in all

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

not just put the caesura in a global variable that is layered into every staff? Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Caesura in Rehearsal Mark over each line of system

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:32:30 -0500 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: In general, the \global variable should contain everything that you want in every Voice — like time signatures, tonalities, etc. Yes, but it's very unfortunate this does not work for \repeats when

Caesura missing?

Hi there, Eventually I found Lilipond and am simply exited about that. But now it seems to lack of one thing, I could not find a Caesura (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesura). At least not in the german manual. Of course not that important, just wanted you to now if it is really missing, else

Re: Caesura missing?

- Original Message - From: Peter Nerlich peter.nerl...@googlemail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:51 PM Subject: Caesura missing? Hi there, Eventually I found Lilipond and am simply exited about that. But now it seems to lack of one thing, I could not find

Re: Caesura missing?

seems to lack of one thing, I could not find a Caesura Hello, have a look on this page: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-curves#breath-marks Best regards, Stefaan. -- http://technogems.blogspot.com http://a-touch-of-music.blogspot.com http

Re: Caesura missing?

Oh, thank you! There it is! 2014-05-30 23:06 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net: - Original Message - From: Peter Nerlich peter.nerl...@googlemail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:51 PM Subject: Caesura missing? Hi there, Eventually I found

Re: Custom caesura command

On 02/05/2014 09:36 PM, Paul Scott wrote: On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:17:53PM -0800, Matthew wrote: Not wanting to type a long \override command in every staff I want a caesura, I tried defining a command to shorten things for me :) . This is what I've tried so far: caesura

Re: Custom caesura command

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:18:11PM -0800, Matthew wrote: On 02/05/2014 09:36 PM, Paul Scott wrote: On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:17:53PM -0800, Matthew wrote: Not wanting to type a long \override command in every staff I want a caesura, I tried defining a command to shorten things for me

Re: Custom caesura command

Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com writes: On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:17:53PM -0800, Matthew wrote: Not wanting to type a long \override command in every staff I want a caesura, I tried defining a command to shorten things for me :) . This is what I've tried so far: caesura

Re: Custom caesura command

That's rather awful code. \override/\revert are not really working all too well for single canned commands like that. I'd rather use something like caesura = \tweak #'text #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.caesura.straight) \tweak #'Y-offset #0 \breathe { c'\caesura d' e' f' } I

Re: Custom caesura command

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:23:22AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com writes: On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:17:53PM -0800, Matthew wrote: Not wanting to type a long \override command in every staff I want a caesura, I tried defining a command to shorten things

Custom caesura command

Not wanting to type a long \override command in every staff I want a caesura, I tried defining a command to shorten things for me :) . This is what I've tried so far: caesura = { \override BreathingSign.text = \markup { \musicglyph #scripts.caesura.straight } \breathe \override

Re: Custom caesura command

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:17:53PM -0800, Matthew wrote: Not wanting to type a long \override command in every staff I want a caesura, I tried defining a command to shorten things for me :) . This is what I've tried so far: caesura = { \override BreathingSign.text = \markup

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

Message: 3 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:41:34 +0100 From: Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark Message-ID: 4f10dd4e.6030...@aikebah.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:10 PM, Tim Reeves wrote: Message: 3 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:41:34 +0100 From: Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark Message-ID: 4f10dd4e.6030

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

...@apollinemike.com wrote on 01/16/2012 11:15:53 AM: From: m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: 01/16/2012 11:15 AM Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:10 PM, Tim Reeves wrote

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

On Jan 17, 2012, at 2:06 AM, Tim Reeves wrote: Mike, Since a note or rest will add to the length of the measure which I don't want to do, could I do the same thing with another object? Maybe an object that does not have be undone later, like a clef would? Why do I have to be such a

caesura but not as a breath mark

Hi, How can I put in railroad tracks / caesura in the middle of the staff? The only example I can find in the documentation has it as a breath mark, so it's at the top of the staff. I want it vertically centered on the staff. Thanks, Tim

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

On 13-1-2012 21:39, Tim Reeves wrote: Hi, How can I put in railroad tracks / caesura in the middle of the staff? The only example I can find in the documentation has it as a breath mark, so it's at the top of the staff. I want it vertically centered on the staff. Tim, To align the caesura

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

Hi, Message: 5 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:05:21 +0100 From: Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark Message-ID: 4f10aaa1.2090...@aikebah.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 13-1-2012 21

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

is not really a breath. Tim . I think it depends on ones point of view; one could argue that a breathing-mark shows a musician where a very short pause is allowed in the music in order to breathe whereas the caesura signals an intentional silent pause in the music. regards, Hans

Re: caesura but not as a breath mark

On 14-1-2012 0:54, Tim Reeves wrote: To be honest, I think it should be possible without using a breath mark, since a railroad tracks is not really a breath. Tim . Just made me wonder, given the 'centred on staff' nature: are you sure you want the caesura and not the simile mark

Re: caesura usage

Op dinsdag 1 januari 2008, schreef Paul Scott: \version 2.11.36 caesuraOn = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.caesura.straight) caesuraOff = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.rcomma) { c'4 \caesuraOn \breathe d'

Re: caesura usage

Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Op dinsdag 1 januari 2008, schreef Paul Scott: \version 2.11.36 caesuraOn = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.caesura.straight) caesuraOff = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.rcomma) { c'4

Re: caesura usage

Op zondag 30 december 2007, schreef Paul Scott: I used to be able to replace the breath mark with something like the following which I have corrected for the new straight caesura glyph name: caesuraOn = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.caesura.straight

Re: caesura usage

Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Op zondag 30 december 2007, schreef Paul Scott: I used to be able to replace the breath mark with something like the following which I have corrected for the new straight caesura glyph name: caesuraOn = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup

Re: caesura usage

f } ---8--8-- which works well in my recent 2.11.36 (git master). Indeed! The problem is when to reset \breathe The attached code would formerly have produced a caesura followed by a comma followed by another caesura. Now the last caesura is cancelled

caesura usage

I used to be able to replace the breath mark with something like the following which I have corrected for the new straight caesura glyph name: caesuraOn = \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts.caesura.straight) The \breathe command would put the caesura glpyh right

caesura again

What would it cost to get a better caesura (railroad tracks)? I will consider sponsoring it. Here are examples of caesuras attached. It should be a pair of parallel lines not two distorted commas. I sent this once but one of the attachments was rejected. Thanks, Paul Scott attachment

Re: caesura again

a better caesura (railroad tracks)? I will consider sponsoring it. Here are examples of caesuras attached. It should be a pair of parallel lines not two distorted commas. I sent this once but one of the attachments was rejected. Thanks, Paul Scott

Re: caesura again

Hi Paul, before an official solution is found maybe something like the code below is a bit closer to what you have in mind. It is based on the definition of \slashSeparator in ly/titling-init.ly, but the result is still a bit ugly and not precisely what you want because the 'flat ends' of the

Re: caesura again

Mats Bengtsson wrote: Please search the mailing list archives for related discussions. I probably started most of those discussions and now we have something which is certainly uglier than any of Han-Wen or Jan's standards. As far as I can remember, the main problem has been to find a layout,

RE: Caesura directly underneath fermata

David - Try this: %%% \version 2.4.6 \layout { raggedright = ##t } \relative c'' { \new Staff { | a a a a ^\markup { \hspace #2 \center-align \musicglyph #scripts-ufermata { \hspace #0.5 \musicglyph #scripts-caesura } } | a a a a } \new Staff { | b b b b

Re: Caesura

Will Oram wrote: Is there a fast way to place a caesura on top of or next to a bar to indicate a musical pause? I'm not talking about the Gregorian caesura (\caesura), which is just a dinky comma. I speak of the 'railroad tracks' used in current notation. Before I try printing a caesura over

Re: Caesura

Will Oram wrote: Is there a fast way to place a caesura on top of or next to a bar to indicate a musical pause? I'm not talking about the Gregorian caesura (\caesura), which is just a dinky comma. I speak of the 'railroad tracks' used in current notation. Before I try printing a caesura over

scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

It's great to have the caesura/cutoff/railroad tracks but the glyph scripts-caesura should be two simple straight lines - slashes // Paul Scott ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

or add another version. (Unmotivated statements like it should don't have the same effect on Han-Wen and Jan.) /Mats Paul Scott wrote: It's great to have the caesura/cutoff/railroad tracks but the glyph scripts-caesura should be two simple straight lines - slashes // Paul Scott

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

Mats Bengtsson wrote: There was a discussion about the layout of these when the symbol was introduced some year ago. If you can provide some references to well typeset scores and preferably some scanned images of what it should look like, I'm sure that the LilyPond implementors will be willing to

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

Just to avoid any risk of confusion, I hope that you have seen the caesura already available in LilyPond: \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts-caesura) es8[ d] \breathe es[ f g f] | This is taken from the example breathing-sign.ly

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

Mats Bengtsson wrote: Just to avoid any risk of confusion, I hope that you have seen the caesura already available in LilyPond: \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts-caesura) es8[ d] \breathe es[ f g f] | This is taken from the example breathing-sign.ly

Re: scripts-caesura - glyph not quite right

that you have seen the caesura already available in LilyPond: \override BreathingSign #'text = #(make-musicglyph-markup scripts-caesura) es8[ d] \breathe es[ f g f] | This is taken from the example breathing-sign.ly in the Regression Tests document. Yes. Thanks. I have used

Caesura

Is there a fast way to place a caesura on top of or next to a bar to indicate a musical pause? I'm not talking about the Gregorian caesura (\caesura), which is just a dinky comma. I speak of the 'railroad tracks' used in current notation. Before I try printing a caesura over a notehead

Re: caesura

Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, 26 May 2003 12:29:36 +0200 Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here's a scan of a caesura captured in the wild. http://daniel.ashtonfam.org/caesura.gif This is from some Canadian Brass music published by Hal Leonard

Re: caesura

On Wednesday 04 June 2003 02:38 pm, Paul Scott wrote: Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, 26 May 2003 12:29:36 +0200 Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here's a scan of a caesura captured in the wild. http://daniel.ashtonfam.org/caesura.gif Measure 25 shows

Re: caesura

On Mon, 26 May 2003 12:29:36 +0200 Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Here's a scan of a caesura captured in the wild. http://daniel.ashtonfam.org/caesura.gif This is from some Canadian Brass music published by Hal Leonard. The scan contains two

Re: caesura

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul, do you have an example you could scan in or something? I gave this in my second post in this thread: It is ID113 in unicode visible here: http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1D100.pdf Are you sure? That looks more like the symbol used to separate systems.

Re: caesura

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul, do you have an example you could scan in or something? I gave this in my second post in this thread: It is ID113 in unicode visible here: http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1D100.pdf Are you sure? That looks more like the symbol used to

Re: caesura

Graham Percival wrote: As for the caesura, I think the proper solution is to add the character to the font, and use it with BreathMark (syntax: \breathe). From what I gather, the symbol is not complicated, so it should be easy. As long as it can intersect the top one or two lines of the staff

Re: caesura

\property Voice.TextScript \override #'extra-offset = #'(-6.0 . -3.0) IIRC the \once property was introduced after I wrote the piece -- I wrote it for music theory a year ago. But thanks for reminding me about \once. :) As for the caesura, I think the proper solution is to add the character

Re: caesura

that no one has needed this common (to me at least) musical notation. Thanks, Paul Paul Scott wrote: Mats Bengtsson wrote: Do you mean something like http://lilypond.org/stable/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Breath-marks.html All I see there is a breath mark. A caesura is two parallel diagonal

Re: caesura

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:05:41 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mats Bengtsson wrote: 2. This symbol needs to be in the staff. It usually cuts the top two lines of the staff. I don't know enough about placing markup or other marks anywhere I want them. This has caused me difficulty

Re: caesura

Graham Percival wrote: On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:05:41 -0700 Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mats Bengtsson wrote: 2. This symbol needs to be in the staff. It usually cuts the top two lines of the staff. I don't know enough about placing markup or other marks anywhere I want them. This has

Re: caesura

Mats Bengtsson wrote: Do you mean something like http://lilypond.org/stable/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Breath-marks.html All I see there is a breath mark. A caesura is two parallel diagonal lines (similar to repeat slashes but placed higher) indicating a short noticeable pause

caesura

How does one create a caesura? Or is there another name used in the documentation? TIA, Paul Scott ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user