On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 21:52 +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This isn't true. The only problem of not removing the old files
is that they take some space. Newer versions of LilyPond will
not use them anymore. Also, the whole problem is more or
less outdated. LilyPond moved away from using TeX and
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:16 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
the debian package lilypond-data has a pre-depend of texlive though
lilypond no longer has a runtime dependency on tex
this is because as thomas explained :
When the package is upgraded, the old
automatically generated fonts need
Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:16 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
the debian package lilypond-data has a pre-depend of texlive though
lilypond no longer has a runtime dependency on tex
...
As long as lilypond-book is included there is a dependancy on latex.
Regards,
/Karl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:16 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
the debian package lilypond-data has a pre-depend of texlive though
lilypond no longer has a runtime dependency on tex
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:49:53 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
As long as lilypond-book is included there is a dependancy on latex.
lilypond-book it is also able to process
Reinhold wrote:
Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:16 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
the debian package lilypond-data has a pre-depend of texlive though
lilypond no longer has a runtime dependency on tex
...
As long as
2008/8/31 Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:16 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
the debian package lilypond-data has a pre-depend of texlive though
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
are the consequences of not cleaning these files up significant compared
with the implications of relying on what should no longer be a dependency.
Yes. Because the files are still hanging around, failure to clean them
produces bugs. People will expect to
2008/8/31 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:49:53 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
As long as lilypond-book is included there is a dependancy on latex.
Francisco Vila wrote:
Isn't this exactly what the recommends: field in .deb files is
for? lilypond-book should recommend latex, docbook, texinfo, and
www-browser.
it does need latex, it does not need docbook (I wonder), it does not
need www-browser. So we have to levels of
2008/8/31 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, it is only recommended if you want to use lilypond-book
in conjunction with latex to produce a document. In that
case, it's pretty obvious to anybody that you need a tex
distribution anyway. However, for the 99% of the users who
don't use
Valentin wrote:
2008/8/31 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, it is only recommended if you want to use lilypond-book
in conjunction with latex to produce a document. In that
case, it's pretty obvious to anybody that you need a tex
distribution anyway. However, for the 99% of the
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 21:54 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
does this mean all this is needed is a modification to the debian
controlfile?
this would be great as if texlive-base is not a dep then lilypond should
be small enough to fit on our live distro :)
No, we're actually using kpsewhich. I
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 21:54 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
does this mean all this is needed is a modification to the debian
controlfile?
this would be great as if texlive-base is not a dep then lilypond should
be small enough to fit on our live distro :)
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 23. August 2008 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
Rob Canning wrote:
but at the moment we have found that lilypond pulls texlive as a
dependency
How come? This used to be true a very long time ago, but
15 matches
Mail list logo
