Hi All.
I'm considering edition engraver to keep my music files cleaner and
set up different editions for different student levels.
I already know how to include some tweaks, but I can't figure how to
set the annotations for right hand fingerings nor string numbers. Can
anyone help?
\version
Dear openlilylib people,
I have read a few messages about this mysterious editionEngraver and I
would like to try using it, but I am doing something wrong and I don't know
what. I found the folder for it on github and tried to use it by
downloading the three files there (definitions.ily
Dear Kevin,
thanks for this hint! There is an error in the description ...
The editionEngraver is part of openLilyLib. To use it, you have to
download the whole library and add the path to the list of include paths.
Then you can
\include editorial-tools/edition-engraver/definitions.ily
and use
2015-01-19 17:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry barr...@gmail.com:
Dear openlilylib people,
I have read a few messages about this mysterious editionEngraver and I
would like to try using it, but I am doing something wrong and I don't know
what. I found the folder for it on github and tried to use
Am 19. Januar 2015 17:45:00 MEZ, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de:
Dear Kevin,
thanks for this hint! There is an error in the description ...
The editionEngraver is part of openLilyLib. To use it, you have to
download the whole library and add the path to the list of include
paths
-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168116.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
.1069038.n5.nabble.com/thanks-again-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168118.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Kieren MacMillan wrote
That’s exactly what I do. =)
If the \editionEngraver had anchors and direct context addressing, I
believe I would be able to finally eliminate all presentation-layer coding
(e.g., \tags, \tweaks, etc.) from my content code.
Hi Kieren, Glad we're on the same page
Hi Kieren,
interesting: I think you are 100% right, yet I have to express
objections - as it's a matter of perspective. But now I think I should
have said depending on the perspective original breaks *can be* part of
the content.
Am 30.10.2014 13:21, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
Hi Urs,
original breaks *are* part of the content so that's not a mixture.
I disagree: original breaks are, in my opinion, part of the original
presentation (engraving) of the content. There are, of course, grey areas in
the “content versus presentation” discussion — e.g., are clefs content
and presentation
that I have in mind:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_presentation_and_content
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/thanks-again-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168116.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
on
this.
Cheers,
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/thanks-again-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168185.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
thinking out loud,
That sounds reasonable.
However, original breaks *are* part of the content so that's not a mixture.
Urs
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/thanks-again-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168103.html
Sent from the User mailing list
MacMillan:
Hi Jan-Peter,
I continue to use your \editionEngraver to great effect. Thanks again! I
really do think such a mechanism — properly tweaked/improved — should become
a standard part of the Liypond distro.
A couple of questions:
1. Have you thought any more about allowing direct
.1069038.n5.nabble.com/thanks-again-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168103.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Paul,
I was thinking the edition engraver would be a good way
to handle Urs’ original breaks functionality.
Urs and I have had a brief private correspondence discussing that very point.
=)
Summary: I don’t think the existence of the \editionEngraver means his
“original breaks
Hi Jan-Peter,
I continue to use your \editionEngraver to great effect. Thanks again! I really
do think such a mechanism — properly tweaked/improved — should become a
standard part of the Liypond distro.
A couple of questions:
1. Have you thought any more about allowing direct addressing
Hi,
2014-07-30 20:39 GMT+02:00 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
\newInstrument ViolinI Violin
Hi,
2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
\newInstrument ViolinI Violin StaffGroup\with { } \with { }
\newInstrument ViolinII Violin StaffGroup\with { }
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
\newInstrument ViolinI Violin StaffGroup\with { } \with { }
2014-07-30 20:47 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
2014-07-30 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
As i said, defining new instrument contexts is very cheap - you can just do
Hi Janek,
your predefined context are cool :)
I see them in context with my lalily templates -- they will of course
benifit. And the editionEngraver can indeed take advantage from specific
context names. But still there need to be a way to separate (for
example) violin 1 and 2. So I will try
Hi Jan-Peter,
2014-07-29 9:34 GMT+02:00 Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de:
Hi Janek,
your predefined context are cool :)
Thanks!
I see them in context with my lalily templates -- they will of course
benifit. And the editionEngraver can indeed take advantage from specific
context names
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Jan-Peter,
2014-07-29 9:34 GMT+02:00 Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de:
Hi Janek,
your predefined context are cool :)
Thanks!
I see them in context with my lalily templates -- they will of course
benifit. And the editionEngraver can
Hi Kieren,
I thought of a change - or addition - like your proposal. At least the
counter should be exchangable by the context-id.
That way partcombined voices can be addressed by up, down and so on.
I can't say, if it is managable to omit the context-name (Voice or Staff
or else). But we will
Hi,
2014-07-28 3:38 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi Jan-Peter,
I think the most complicated part is addressing multiple voices in one Staff.
[…]
propably there are more things to modify to make it more intuitive.
I think the stated problem would be solved *AND*
Hi Jan-Peter,
I think the most complicated part is addressing multiple voices in one Staff.
[…]
propably there are more things to modify to make it more intuitive.
I think the stated problem would be solved *AND* the whole machinery made more
intuitive by allowing a context to be “direct
Hi Kieren,
I almost missed your mail ... right now I am on a rehearsal and concert
trip.
On 18.07.2014 21:02, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hello all,
This is just another note of thanks to everyone (especially Jan-Peter) who
makes things like the editionEngraver possible in Lilypond.
The power
Hello all,
This is just another note of thanks to everyone (especially Jan-Peter) who
makes things like the editionEngraver possible in Lilypond.
The power of this tool blows my mind.
I’m not sure if it can be made any easier to include and implement/use, but if
it can, we really OWE
29 matches
Mail list logo
