Re: efficient score and part production

2003-10-14 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I don't really see any advantage of using sed or some other preprocessor compared to the ordinary features of LilyPond: \repeat unfold 3 { R1 } or Notes={...} MeasureRest={...} SomethingElse={...} {\Notes \Notes \MeasureRest \MeasureRest \MeasureRest \repeat unfold 10 \SomethingElse ... }

Re: efficient score and part production

2003-10-14 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:50:14 -0700, Paul a dit : I have posted variations of this before and I am at least curious what some of you do to save work here. [...] That means I only have to type all of that information once no matter how may parts/voices there are. It also means once I

Re: efficient score and part production

2003-10-14 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 10:46 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote: I don't really see any advantage of using sed or some other preprocessor compared to the ordinary features of LilyPond: It fills in the blanks while you are writing, so you do not have to write in sequence, you can leave measures blank

efficient score and part production

2003-10-13 Thread Paul Scott
I have posted variations of this before and I am at least curious what some of you do to save work here. My questions about Frenched staves are just a subset of what I try to do to make my work easier *and* more accurate. Multi-measure rests are also related here. As a professional copyist

Re: efficient score and part production

2003-10-13 Thread Aaron
yeah this is sorta what I had in mind with the thread conditional text et al. One thing I have seen and it is really amazing are work arounds of people that eventually become features. I would hope that this continues, repeats in their present form are a bugaboo for lilypond newbies, and the