Dear Werner, and Dear all,
I dont want to set NDT for new compositions. I just want to enjoy
diversity of engraving, with their different valid points. And surely
we will continue to play barock and polypnohic music for many years.
In the mean time, I had and deeper and serious look to Scheme
>> ??? Are you really trying to reactivate Neue Deutsche
>> Orgeltabulatur, three hundred years after it was abandonded?
>
> There can be multiple reasons why one would do that: [...]
All of these are valid points. However, it seems to me that he wants
to actually *add* features to this
Dear Karl, Werner and All,
Thanks Karl these are two points.
Also stretching the score is really a poit in concert (not mentionned
that another aproach of the matter is recommended from pedagogists). I
had a try with OO-calc and OO-writer, the score reduces to half of
traditional score, and more
Werner:
...
> ??? Are you really trying to reactivate Neue Deutsche Orgeltabulatur,
> three hundred years after it was abandonded?
There can be multiple reasons why one would do that:
. the somewhat academic point in being able to do that
. when transcribing things I've found that that is
> sadly, you are right. I had a closer look at what I thought to be an
> ''es'' but is a ''dis'',
>
> Nevertheless, in my idea it should be the user who would choose
> alternatives (historical (only sharps and b), my-way (flats, sharps
> and even double-falts and d-sharps), and alternative.
???
Dear Werner,
sadly, you are right. I had a closer look at what I thought to be an
''es'' but is a ''dis'',
Nevertheless, in my idea it should be the user who would choose
alternatives (historical (only sharps and b), my-way (flats, sharps
and even double-falts and d-sharps), and alternative.
I
> About the flat in the new german TAB,
AFAIK there doesn't exist a flat at all in the Neue Deutsche
Orgeltabulatur.
> I would be pleased if you confirm me, or not: in Scheidemann's
> Judentanz, I read the (recurrent) es as it is and not as a s.
I don't understand this sentence. Please
Hello Werner and All,
I have readen your article. Many thanks anyway. I didnt thought that
the TAB was the standard notation before our actual system.
About the flat in the new german TAB, I would be pleased if you
confirm me, or not: in Scheidemann's Judentanz, I read the (recurrent)
es as it is
>> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur#Neue_deutsche_Orgeltabulatur
>
> Hi, I would be interested maybe; coincidentally I’m just now reading
> Willi Apel’s book on notation and the next chapter I’ll read is
> about the old and the new German organ tab.
It's an interesting topic indeed –
Am 23.12.2017 um 20:38 schrieb Ali Cuota:
Excuse me, the New German Tabulatur is my topic.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur#Neue_deutsche_Orgeltabulatur
Hi, I would be interested maybe; coincidentally I’m just now reading
Willi Apel’s book on notation and the next chapter I’ll read
>>> I would like to use the keyboard TAB
>>> (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur) as alternative to "normal"
>>> notation.
>>
>> Which one? There are so many tablutures. Please give an example
>> (i.e., the `normal' notation and the tablature version).
>
> Excuse me, the New German
Hallo Werner,
Excuse me, the New German Tabulatur is my topic.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur#Neue_deutsche_Orgeltabulatur
Danke
Francois,
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail;
> I would like to use the keyboard TAB
> (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur) as alternative to "normal"
> notation.
Which one? There are so many tablutures. Please give an example
(i.e., the `normal' notation and the tablature version).
Werner
Dear lilyponders,
I have very very basic notions about programming and cant do what I
really want, so I come to you all to ask for (paid) help.
I would like to use the keyboard TAB (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur)
as alternative to "normal" notation.
My idea is to pass normal *.ly
14 matches
Mail list logo
