Re: programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for Slur.control-points

2022-10-26 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 26/10/2022 à 09:11, Jean Abou Samra a écrit : Could you send the file to me? Thanks for sending, I've minimized it and opened https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6447 Best, Jean

Re: programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for Slur.control-points

2022-10-26 Thread Jean Abou Samra
ng it. > > Interpreting music...[8][16] > Preprocessing graphical objects... > Finding the ideal number of pages... > Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages... > Drawing systems... > /var/home/fede/Documenti/spartiti/ly/../Unterberger/Percfest.ily:103:25: > programming error: cyclic dependency:

programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for Slur.control-points

2022-10-25 Thread Federico Bruni
pages... Drawing systems... /var/home/fede/Documenti/spartiti/ly/../Unterberger/Percfest.ily:103:25: programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for Slur.control-points ( \glissando ) ~ \mBreak \set doubleSlurs = ##f | /var/home/fede

Re: programming error: cyclic dependency

2012-04-29 Thread Peter O'Doherty
no error is full of these errors: warning: programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for #'positions (Beam) I don't see anything strange in the final pdf file so is this warning to be ignored? Many thanks, Peter Lots of work was done in beams in 2.13 and 2.15

programming error: cyclic dependency

2012-04-28 Thread Peter O'Doherty
Hi list, After updating my system to Ubuntu 11.10 (although I can't see why this is relevant but this is the only change I've made to the system recently), code which previously output no error is full of these errors: warning: programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress

Re: programming error: cyclic dependency

2012-04-28 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
: programming error: cyclic dependency: calculation-in-progress encountered for #'positions (Beam) I don't see anything strange in the final pdf file so is this warning to be ignored? Many thanks, Peter Lots of work was done in beams in 2.13 and 2.15. If you could send a minimal example (of one beam