Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Here's a patch incorporating your suggestions, Carl. Thanks for the help.
Jon
Carl, when you get a moment would you mind checking the patch I sent
last night, and push if it looks ok? I don't think Trevor's going to be
around for a while to do doc patches. Thanks,
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
OK, done.
Everything looked great -- you even took out some pre-existing line-ending
whitespace.
Must be the excellent training I've gotten. ;) One (or maybe all) of
you guys--Trevor, Graham, or you--taught me to strip the trailing spaces
before creating the patch.
Carl,
I'm working on your suggestions and have come across a problem.
\relative c' { \chordmode { c \relative c'' { c }}
This last example won't compile. (It was missing the last curly brace
but I added it.) Here's the terminal output:
chordmode.ly:1:40: error: syntax error, unexpected
Jonathan == Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com writes:
Jonathan Carl, I'm working on your suggestions and have come across a
Jonathan problem.
\relative c' { \chordmode { c \relative c'' { c }}
Jonathan This last example won't compile. (It was missing the last
Jonathan curly brace but I
On 5/18/09 6:04 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl,
I'm working on your suggestions and have come across a problem.
\relative c' { \chordmode { c \relative c'' { c }}
This last example won't compile. (It was missing the last curly brace
but I added it.) Here's
Here's a patch incorporating your suggestions, Carl. Thanks for the help.
Jon
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.eduwrote:
On 5/18/09 6:04 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl,
I'm working on your suggestions and have come across a
In message c6334c1b.93d6%c_soren...@byu.edu, Carl D. Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu writes
On 5/15/09 3:06 PM, Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk
wrote:
In message 200905151909580...@1654122929, David Pounder
pound...@lineone.net writes
I don't know if it's worth mentioning, but
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chip c...@wiegand.org wrote:
Chip wrote:
I've come across this a couple times - when I am inputting a song it all
works fine in \relative mode. I do some editing, some copy/paste from one
part to another, view the resulting pdf
Chip wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chip c...@wiegand.org wrote:
Chip wrote:
I've come across this a couple times - when I am inputting a song it
all
works fine in \relative mode. I do some editing, some copy/paste
from one
part to another, view the
Hi Jon,
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Chip wrote:
snip
I think this is the issue mentioned in the Known Issues for Chapter
1.1.2 Transpose in the Notation Reference. However, the two
sentences included there are very confusing and should be rewritten
make the issue more clear.
-Patrick
Yes, I
On 5/15/09 5:05 AM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
Chip wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chip c...@wiegand.org wrote:
I think this is the issue mentioned in the Known Issues for Chapter
1.1.2 Transpose in the Notation Reference. However, the
I'm not sure that the relative mode gets forgotten but that
LilyPond follows its own internal rules. I find that LilyPond
behaves the way that the manual says it does: it picks the closest
pitch. If I write { c2 a2 } it picks the A below that C rather than
the A above that C. If I want
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Music inside a \transpose or \chordmode block is absolute, unless a
\relative is included inside the the \transpose or \chordmode block. When
\relative blocks are nested, the innermost relative block applies.
I don't understand why \chordmode (and \chords) changes
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:46:39AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
First, I think that the information above should be put into 1.1.1 Writing
Pitches as examples under Relative octave entry. There should be three
separate items/examples:
When relative blocks are nested, the innermost
Tim McNamara wrote:
I'm not sure that the relative mode gets forgotten but that LilyPond
follows its own internal rules. I find that LilyPond behaves the way
that the manual says it does: it picks the closest pitch. If I write
{ c2 a2 } it picks the A below that C rather than the A above
On 5/15/09 8:43 AM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Music inside a \transpose or \chordmode block is absolute, unless a
\relative is included inside the the \transpose or \chordmode block. When
\relative blocks are nested, the innermost
In message 20090515145035.ga3...@nagi, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca writes
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:46:39AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
First, I think that the information above should be put into 1.1.1 Writing
Pitches as examples under Relative octave entry. There should be
--- Original Message ---
From: Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: 15.5.09, 18:03:43
Subject: Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?
In message 20090515145035.ga3...@nagi, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca writes
On May 15, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Chip wrote:
Tim McNamara wrote:
I'm not sure that the relative mode gets forgotten but that
LilyPond follows its own internal rules. I find that LilyPond
behaves the way that the manual says it does: it picks the closest
pitch. If I write { c2 a2 } it
In message 200905151909580...@1654122929, David Pounder
pound...@lineone.net writes
--- Original Message ---
From: Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: 15.5.09, 18:03:43
Subject: Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?
In message
On 5/15/09 3:06 PM, Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk
wrote:
In message 200905151909580...@1654122929, David Pounder
pound...@lineone.net writes
I don't know if it's worth mentioning, but you can also run into
problems using \repeat inside a \relative block if an
--- Original Message ---
From: Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
To: Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk,
lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: 15.5.09, 23:43:07
Subject: Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?
On 5/15/09 3:06 PM, Anthony W
I've come across this a couple times - when I am inputting a song it all
works fine in \relative mode. I do some editing, some copy/paste from
one part to another, view the resulting pdf and see the octaves are all
messed up. The only way to fix them is to use absolute octave marks in
small
Chip wrote:
I've come across this a couple times - when I am inputting a song it
all works fine in \relative mode. I do some editing, some copy/paste
from one part to another, view the resulting pdf and see the octaves
are all messed up. The only way to fix them is to use absolute octave
Chip wrote:
Chip wrote:
I've come across this a couple times - when I am inputting a song it
all works fine in \relative mode. I do some editing, some copy/paste
from one part to another, view the resulting pdf and see the octaves
are all messed up. The only way to fix them is to use absolute
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Chip c...@wiegand.org wrote:
Chip wrote:
I've come across this a couple times - when I am inputting a song it all
works fine in \relative mode. I do some editing, some copy/paste from one
part to another, view the resulting pdf and see the octaves are all
26 matches
Mail list logo
