On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 12:26, Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> On 2019-08-19 6:50 pm, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The manual says:
> >
> > “To set the staff size globally for all scores in a file (or in a \book
> > block, to be precise), use set-
On 2019-08-19 6:50 pm, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
Hi everyone,
The manual says:
“To set the staff size globally for all scores in a file (or in a \book
block, to be precise), use set-global-staff-size”
What am I doing wrong here? The size 8 one is large and the size 50 one
is
normal (20
Hi everyone,
The manual says:
“To set the staff size globally for all scores in a file (or in a \book
block, to be precise), use set-global-staff-size”
What am I doing wrong here? The size 8 one is large and the size 50 one is
normal (20 probably?)
%%
\version
>>> On 27/01/2019 04:52, David F. wrote:
>>> I can specify the font for my score to use with #(define fonts … ), but
>>> calling #(set-global-staff-size) undoes the font definition.
I seem to recall that’s documented somewhere but I can’t find where.
>> Why d
On Jan 27, 2019, at 9:09 PM, Martin Neubauer wrote:
> On 27/01/2019 04:52, David F. wrote:
>> I can specify the font for my score to use with #(define fonts … ), but
>> calling #(set-global-staff-size) undoes the font definition.
>>
>> In the snippet below, T
On 27/01/2019 04:52, David F. wrote:
> I can specify the font for my score to use with #(define fonts … ), but
> calling #(set-global-staff-size) undoes the font definition.
>
> In the snippet below, Times New Roman will be used as the font for the whole
> document.
On Jan 26, 2019, at 8:52 PM, David F. wrote:
> I can specify the font for my score to use with #(define fonts … ), but
> calling #(set-global-staff-size) undoes the font definition.
>
> In the snippet below, Times New Roman will be used as the font for the whole
> document.
I can specify the font for my score to use with #(define fonts … ), but calling
#(set-global-staff-size) undoes the font definition.
In the snippet below, Times New Roman will be used as the font for the whole
document. But if line 6 is uncommented, the font reverts to the default of New
obally for all scores in a file (or all
> scores in a \book block, to be precise, because LilyPond wraps all
> toplevel scores in a book anyway), use set-global-staff-size at
> top-level".
> Probably one should add:
> If a file contains multiple books every books staff-size may be s
Am Do., 25. Okt. 2018 um 19:03 Uhr schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier
:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > Yep, set-global-staff-size _must_ be set at top-level, outside of \book.
>
> That's good to know.
> The documentation got me going on using-it inside \book{}s.
> http://lilypond.
Hi Thomas,
> Yep, set-global-staff-size _must_ be set at top-level, outside of \book.
That's good to know.
The documentation got me going on using-it inside \book{}s.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-size
> #(set-global-staff-size x)
> \book {
Hi Pierre-Luc,
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 16:01 Uhr schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier
:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> %#(set-global-staff-size 4)
> \book {
> #(set-global-staff-size 4)
> \score {
> {\tempo 4=120 c4}
>
Hi there,
Is this a bug?
\version "2.21.0"
%#(set-global-staff-size 4)
\book {
#(set-global-staff-size 4)
\score {
{\tempo 4=120 c4}
\layout {}
}
}
I'm trying to set the global staff size of a single book and I got
this strange result.
Am I using it wrong?
It
To get around the anomaly I reported previously, I am rewriting my
book-cover generating routine.
I need to use \fromproperty with a variable which is set at the top
level (i.e. outside any \book block). If necessary, the variable could
be set inside a \book or \bookpart, although this is less
%%%
\version "2.19.48"
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
\book {
\markup {
\abs-fontsize #48
\bold "Title 1"
}
}
#(set-global-staff-size 16)
\book {
\markup {
\abs-fontsize #48
\bold "Title 2"
}
}
> This evening I compiled the thing for one last inspection before a
> final printing. I then realised that I had not set the staff-size for
> the score, and both score and parts were being printed with #(set-
> global-staff-size 20). I use a staff size of 16 for full scores, so
On 06.01.2017 22:12, David Sumbler wrote:
But can anyone explain what is happening here?
I’m afraid I have to say this: it seems weird, and there’s no way to
tell more without a code example. I assume you didn’t do that, because
it’s very cumbersome and you don’t want to share the whole
the staff-size for
the score, and both score and parts were being printed with #(set-
global-staff-size 20). I use a staff size of 16 for full scores, so I
added the appropriate line at the beginning of the file which prints
the score. This now begins:
\version "2.19.48"
#(set-global-sta
Hello Simon,
Thanks!
JM
> Le 25 sept. 2016 à 18:52, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> a écrit :
>
> On 25.09.2016 18:38, Menu Jacques wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> The NR as of 2.19 is not restrictive regarding where a command such as:
>>
>>
On 25.09.2016 18:38, Menu Jacques wrote:
Hello folks,
The NR as of 2.19 is not restrictive regarding where a command such as:
#(set-global-staff-size 26)
can be placed, but I remember someone on this list saying that it should be
before the \paper block.
What is the exact
Hello folks,
The NR as of 2.19 is not restrictive regarding where a command such as:
#(set-global-staff-size 26)
can be placed, but I remember someone on this list saying that it should be
before the \paper block.
What is the exact recommendation/limitation?
Thanks for the help!
JM
you've learned already.
Regards,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/problem-with-installed-font-when-set-global-staff-size-is-changed-tp179484p179539.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi!
I would like to use the Garamond font for all the text in my sheet
(header, lyrics, markup). I downloaded the EBGaramond from
http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/download.html and put all the
.otf-files into the directory
lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf
Nearly everything
settings, so you have to first change staff size, then change the fonts.
Normally this would mean inserting #(set-global-staff-size 21) _before_
the paper block; with #layout-set-staff-size however, I don’t know of
any solution.
HTH, Simon
___
lilypond
in Garamond font when the global-staff-size is changed.
The problem is that setting staff size overrides the previous font
settings, so you have to first change staff size, then change the fonts.
Normally this would mean inserting #(set-global-staff-size 21) _before_
the paper block; with #layout-set
Hi List,
Please consider the following code:
\version 2.18.2
%\version 2.19.16 %% = same result
accords = \chordmode { c1 g1:7 }
musique = \relative c' { c4 d e f g1 }
paroles = \lyricmode { bla bla bla bla bla }
%#(set-global-staff-size 30)
\book {
\bookOutputSuffix a4
\paper {
#(set
-size 40)
I would like to increase the staff however when i change
#(set-global-staff-size 40)
my tagline gets bigger. How can i overcome this?
thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
I would like to increase the staff however when i change
#(set-global-staff-size 40)
my tagline gets bigger. How can i overcome this?
thanks
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Try :
tagline = \markup\fontsize #-5 My Tagline
See also :
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-size
\score{
…
\layout{
#(layout-set-staff-size 15)
}
}
and for v2.19 :
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-size
is that #(set-global-staff-size) doesn't work in that
constellation, IISC because it's not a toplevel expression anymore.
The attached files show a very stripped-down version of the stuff and
will probably not look very useful.
But my question is: How can I set the global staff size from within
Hi Urs,
this constellation compiles, if you wrap the scheme-call to
set-global-staff-size into a void-function. But if it is called, when
the book is already opened, the staff-size is already initialized and
can't be changed (for this book).
It probably works, if you place #(set-global-staff-size
Am 16.05.2014 10:54, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi Urs,
this constellation compiles, if you wrap the scheme-call to
set-global-staff-size into a void-function. But if it is called, when
the book is already opened, the staff-size is already initialized and
can't be changed (for this book
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 9:42 AM
Subject: set-global-staff-size from inside Scheme function
Hi,
I have been there already, but I can't find the corresponding email, and
I don't recall
book
#{ \paper {} #}
#{ \layout{} #}
(ly:parser-output-name parser
works (i.e. doing the include first before the (let ) block).
But I still get a warning
example-styles.ily:3:1: warning: Ignoring non-music expression
#(set-global-staff-size 44)
I
Hi! Do you think it is possible to have two #(set-global-staff-size ) in a
single file: one
for multi-instruments (18) and one for one part (24)?
Thanks!
\version 2.19.2
\language english
#(set-global-staff-size 18)
\header {
title = Titolo
}
\paper {
#(set-paper-size a4)
}
global
In data lun 3 mar 2014 23:57:40, hai scritto:
If you use two \book {} contexts, each can contain its own
set-global-staff-size command.
*_\version 2.19.2_*
*_\language english_*
*_\header {_*
*_ title = Titolo_*
*_}_*
*_\paper {_*
*_ #(set-paper-size a4)_*
*_}_*
*_global = {_*
*_ \key c
Gilles
On 30 September 2012 22:17, Gilles gilles.thiba...@free.fr wrote:
My command I am trying to run is
lilypond -e '#(set-global-staff-size 32)' --pdf myfile.ly
Hello James
I had a similar problem in the past
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg7.html
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On 30 September 2012 22:17, Gilles gilles.thiba...@free.fr wrote:
My command I am trying to run is
lilypond -e '#(set-global-staff-size 32)' --pdf myfile.ly
Do you know why I cannot use the normal '#(set-global-staff-size 22)'
or '(set-global-staff-size 22
Hello,
Here is my simple example
--snip--
\version 2.16.0
{ a b c d }
--snip--
My command I am trying to run is
lilypond -e '#(set-global-staff-size 32)' --pdf myfile.ly
I get no warnings or errors and the files compiles but the staff size
has not changed.
The Usage suggests
adding
#(use
My command I am trying to run is
lilypond -e '#(set-global-staff-size 32)' --pdf myfile.ly
Hello James
I had a similar problem in the past
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg7.html
To run successfully your file, i have changed a bit your code and your
command
Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/7 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
It is a way but the problem I find is that the file won't compile with
that commandline option.
Say your file is
% this is example.ly
#(use-modules (guile-user))
#(set-global-staff-size size)
\repeat unfold 20
-Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/12/7 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
It is a way but the problem I find is that the file won't compile with
that commandline option.
Say your file is
% this is example.ly
#(use-modules (guile-user))
#(set-global-staff
Hi,
Is it possible to set global staff size as command line option?
Like it is possible to specify paper size with
lilypond -dpaper-size=\letter\ myfile.ly
I'd like a similar command line option for #(set-global-staff-size 14) .
Is there a way to achieve this with current version?
Anyway, I
2011/12/7 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is it possible to set global staff size as command line option?
Like it is possible to specify paper size with
lilypond -dpaper-size=\letter\ myfile.ly
I'd like a similar command line option for #(set-global-staff-size 14
2011/12/7 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
It is a way but the problem I find is that the file won't compile with
that commandline option.
Oh sorry, I meant the file won't compile _without_ that commandline option.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
2011/12/7 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
lilypond -e '(define-public size 40)' a.ly
And of course there were more typos. It is not a.ly but example.ly in
my example above.
Sorry!
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
On Wed 06 Oct 2010, 17:29 Christopher Meredith wrote:
I noticed that the values for set-global-staff-size are usually given
in non-whole increments. If I were to use one in between these
suggested increments, will it cause scaling irregularities? In other
words, if 14.14 is too small and 15.87
I noticed that the values for set-global-staff-size are usually given
in non-whole increments. If I were to use one in between these
suggested increments, will it cause scaling irregularities? In other
words, if 14.14 is too small and 15.87 is too large, can I use
something like 15, or do I have
On 8/20/08, Tom Cloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\paper {
#(set-default-paper-size letter 'portrait)
ragged-last-bottom = ##t % turns off vertical justify
left-margin = 0.6\in
line-width = 7\in % works better than specifying R-margin
bottom-margin = .7\in
I suspect this is simple - but not for me.
I've tried hard to solve this one myself, but I'm not coming up with
ANYTHING helpful anywhere.
If I have
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
in my code, I get 6 staffs spread across 1.5 pages (#6 is all that's on
page 2). If I set the size to 18, I get
://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-06/msg00345.html
Am 20.08.2008 um 12:56 schrieb Tom Cloyd:
I suspect this is simple - but not for me.
I've tried hard to solve this one myself, but I'm not coming up with
ANYTHING helpful anywhere.
If I have
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
in my code, I get
didn't
help either.
t.
Tom Cloyd wrote:
I suspect this is simple - but not for me.
I've tried hard to solve this one myself, but I'm not coming up with
ANYTHING helpful anywhere.
If I have
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
in my code, I get 6 staffs spread across 1.5 pages (#6 is all that's
Hi.
If I have
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
in my code, I get 6 staffs spread across 1.5 pages (#6 is all that's on
page 2). If I set the size to 18, I get the crowded onto one page with
2 at the bottom.
I cannot figure out what's happening, or how to get better control of
spacing
2008/8/20 Tom Cloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As for the staff spacing problem - if someone can just give me a clue
where to go in the documentation, that would likely suffice. Google's
doing nothing for me, and cruising the 2.11 docs contents list didn't
help either.
Usually I try adjust
Hi Valentin,
On 7/27/07, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/7/27, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(maybe it was a .27 bug, or something in my previous installation was
corrupted...).
It's definitely a .27 bug; I was able to reproduce it with another
installation of
2007/7/27, Ledocq-Boccart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have just done a cut and try test as I (i.e. newbie) cannot do
otherwise as yet.
Thank you for testing. Everything works fine since I installed 2.11.28
(maybe it was a .27 bug, or something in my previous installation was
corrupted...).
Hello Valentin,
Valentin Villenave a écrit :
...However, I've just discovered that when I specify a different
global-staff-size, the compilation goes fine, no error messages... but
the .pdf (as well as the .ps) output is just one empty page!
I have just done a cut and try test as I (i.e.
2007/7/27, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(maybe it was a .27 bug, or something in my previous installation was
corrupted...).
It's definitely a .27 bug; I was able to reproduce it with another
installation of .27, on a different OS.
V.V.
2007/7/26, Dominic Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
strange ... on my 2.10.25 system i get output in both variants (13 or
14). there are some errors but this could also come from using a 2.10
version instead of 2.11.
OK, I made some tests
It works with 2.10.25
It works with 2.11.28
It *doesn't*
, the score
always prints fine).
Thank you all,
Valentin
%%% score.ly %%%
\version 2.11
\include italiano.ly
%% uncomment one of the following lines:
%% with 14 it doesn't print, whereas
%% with 13 it's fine
%#(set-global-staff-size 14)
%#(set-global-staff-size 13)
mesuresUn= {
\set
The line
#(set-global-staff-size 16)
calls a Scheme function that is executed when LilyPond reads the file.
Apparently, it sets the fonts in some way. This means that you need to have
that line at the top of the file, before the make-pango-font-tree line.
For example
#(set-global-staff-size 16
Hi!
I would like to know what is going wrong with this code. I tried to change
the fonts but it doesn't work. But if I remove the set-global-staff-size
function, the fonts changed as I wanted. Is this a bug or there is something
with the make-pango-font-tree that I don't know?
I'm working
Hello, all --
Is there any way to declare the staff-size on a per-score basis,
instead of globally using #(set-global-staff-size X)?
e.g., something like
\version 2.9.10
\score
{
{ a4 b c d }
\layout
{
#(set-staff-size 18)
}
}
\score
63 matches
Mail list logo
