2009/4/7 Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org:
Can be typed pretty rapidly too: hold down right shift with your little
finger and fall under the index and middle fingers.
..not everyone uses us keyboard
Exactly. It's already a pain to type `{', `}', and `\' with a German
keyboard...
...or a
Can be typed pretty rapidly too: hold down right shift with your little
finger and fall under the index and middle fingers.
..not everyone uses us keyboard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Can be typed pretty rapidly too: hold down right shift with your little
finger and fall under the index and middle fingers.
..not everyone uses us keyboard
Exactly. It's already a pain to type `{', `}', and `\' with a German
keyboard...
Werner
Op zondag 05-04-2009 om 18:13 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
as long as I have anything to do with LilyPond, I will veto changes
like this that introduce inconsistent whitespace handling in the
syntax.
What was the problem with this again? It is not so much inconsistent
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
janneke-l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
as long as I have anything to do with LilyPond, I will veto changes
like this that introduce inconsistent whitespace handling in the
syntax.
What was the problem with this again? It is not so much inconsistent
Despite the fact that it would cause massive problems in parsing, a line
like
c4 4 4 4
is not quite readable for me.
As lilypond is THE tool for typesetting beautiful scores, the source
file should
reflect the beauty. So I should be able to grasp the score at first sight,
and in my opinion,
I would avoid getting in this discussion before the feature is
complete. Just call it \r (using an identifier or keyword), and see
how it works in practice. When it is debugged, think of a character.
The advantage of not using a letter a-z is that there are no backward
compat problems with
In message 49da120a.7090...@hohlart.de, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
writes
1) personally, I would use the %, but this is the comment sign and
can't be used.
(perhaps this would be even possible, but ... NO!)
Oh my gosh, please, NOOO
As Han-Wen has said, parsing is important. In another
3) why not use a x for eXpression, because the sign is meant not
only to repeat Qords, but everything reasonable?
I don't object. A chord is then played 3x (3 times) more, so use of
`x' is really justified.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing
Anthony W. Youngman schrieb:
In message 49da120a.7090...@hohlart.de, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
writes
1) personally, I would use the %, but this is the comment sign and
can't be used.
(perhaps this would be even possible, but ... NO!)
Oh my gosh, please, NOOO
As Han-Wen has said,
Why not use an empty pair of braces, which at the moment are just ignored by
the parser, to dignify chord repetition:
c e g gives c e g c e g
c e g 3 gives c e g c e g c e g c e g
c e g c gives c e g c - ie ignored as now if preceding element is
not a chord
Can be typed pretty rapidly too:
11 matches
Mail list logo
