On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:00:40 -0700
David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com wrote:
The request is for six commands (NOT markups, but actual music commands
that affect the MIDI output and so on):
\segno
\fine
\tocoda
\coda
\dacapo
\dalsegno
Disclaimer: I am not a Lilypond developer. But
Nils l...@nilsgey.de writes:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:00:40 -0700
David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com wrote:
The request is for six commands (NOT markups, but actual music commands
that affect the MIDI output and so on):
\segno
\fine
\tocoda
\coda
\dacapo
\dalsegno
Disclaimer: I
David Kastrup wrote:
Nils l...@nilsgey.de writes:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:00:40 -0700
David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com wrote:
The request is for six commands (NOT markups, but actual music commands
that affect the MIDI output and so on):
\segno
\fine
\tocoda
\coda
\dacapo
2012/8/1 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Helge Kruse
See https://github.com/hanwen/enc2ly/blob/master/enc2ly.go
Results in: 404 This is not the web page you are looking for.
Helge
But it's not too hard to correct:
On 2 août 2012, at 16:14, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 02/08/12 14:49, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
If you guys can get a Google Grant for your LilyPond non-profit
in the Netherlands, now would be a fantastic time to run
On 2 août 2012, at 16:02, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 02/08/12 14:49, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
If you guys can get a Google Grant for your LilyPond non-profit in the
Netherlands, now would be a fantastic time to run ads on Google getting
Sibelius users to check out LilyPond. It's
I have made a small function that allows me to put out the fret number
(of a guitar) below a note. My problem is that the text is positioned
below the note at a specific distance. Which means that if the note is
high on the staff the text will be high and if the note is low on the
staff it
On 02/08/12 15:14, Graham Percival wrote:
Well, they have the email address of our development mailing list.
... and presumably you have theirs. Why not be the ones to initiate the
discussion?
I've heard this work together more idea a few times, but I have
no clue what that would entail.
and...@andis59.se wrote:
I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to a
music part.
Since my music is supposed to be played on a Pedal Steel Guitar I need
some special string numbers.
On the Pedal Steel Guitar there are 10 string (may be more or less, but
On 02/08/12 15:26, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
It may also be worth it to contact Avid. As crazy as this sounds, they may actually
appreciate LilyPond stepping in and saying Hey, we have a great piece of software
that we're proud of that will spare you a lot of headaches in terms of support
What else could we do to work together? (be it with musescore,
denemo, laborejo, elysium, etc)
- Graham
For my part: nothing. Laborejo is created for Lilypond, not just a notation
tool with an exporter. I can adapt to any Lilypond changes very fast and
Laborejo users, in the future because
2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to a music
part.
Since my music is supposed to be played on a Pedal Steel Guitar I need some
special string numbers.
On the Pedal Steel Guitar there are 10 string (may be more or
On 2012-08-02 17:18, Thomas Morley wrote:
2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to a music
part.
You could call the function below in \melody
(I named it \xy. You may want to change this uninspired term.) :)
xy =
On 2012-08-02 17:08, -Eluze wrote:
I think you have to use another font,
e.g.
\override StringNumber #'font-name = Garamond bold
and override the size to your needs: \override StringNumber #'font-size =
#-1
hth
Eluze
I can't get this to work!
Where should I put the overrides?
//
On 2012-08-02 17:34, and...@andis59.se wrote:
On 2012-08-02 17:08, -Eluze wrote:
I think you have to use another font,
e.g.
\override StringNumber #'font-name = Garamond bold
and override the size to your needs: \override StringNumber
#'font-size =
#-1
hth
Eluze
I can't get this to
On 2012-08-02 17:33, and...@andis59.se wrote:
On 2012-08-02 17:18, Thomas Morley wrote:
2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
I'm using the scheme function \addFingering to add string numbers to
a music
part.
You could call the function below in \melody
(I named it \xy. You may want
On 02/08/12 16:04, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Even if no actual development overlap takes place, there are still other
potential areas of cooperation -- infrastructure, project management,
fundraising, organizing events and demonstrations -- to make it worthwhile.
Just to give some
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Rodolfo Zitellini xhero...@gmail.com writes:
Hi All!
is the meeting open to all users?
Yes. We need to keep track of the head count and have to cater for
accommodation/food accordingly, but that does not seem like much of
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
What else could we do to work together? (be it with musescore,
denemo, laborejo, elysium, etc)
- Graham
For my part: nothing. Laborejo is created for Lilypond, not just a notation
tool with an exporter. I can adapt to any Lilypond
On 20/07/12 21:40, David Kastrup wrote:
A number of core LilyPond contributors have agreed to come. Apart from
myself, Graham, Mike, possibly John, Valentin (?), Janek, Marc, Thomas
Morley will be present. Depending on their travel dates, I will try to
arrange workshops and discussion groups for
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
More generally than that, I think the reason to discuss is to _discover_ the
areas where you can cooperate. There are obvious areas of interaction --
e.g. enabling Lilypond output for MuseScore and
On 2 août 2012, at 18:18, Lucas Gonze wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
More generally than that, I think the reason to discuss is to _discover_ the
areas where you can cooperate. There are obvious areas of interaction --
e.g.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
It is very difficult. It's better to use a front-end editor that shows some
sorta mock-up of the score and that only compiles the nice LilyPond version
from time to time (if this exists). Getting an actual
2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
I have made a small function that allows me to put out the fret number (of a
guitar) below a note. My problem is that the text is positioned below the
note at a specific distance. Which means that if the note is high on the
staff the text will be
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 06:22:49PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 2 août 2012, at 18:18, Lucas Gonze wrote:
Is it architecturally possible to make a significant amount of
overhead go away? Are incremental compiles plausible?
It is very difficult. It's better to use a front-end
On 2012-08-02 18:46, Thomas Morley wrote:
fN =
#(define-music-function (parser location fretp) (string?)
(let ((m (make-music 'TextScriptEvent 'text fretp)))
(set! (ly:music-property m 'tweaks)
(acons 'staff-padding 4 (ly:music-property m 'tweaks)))
m))
Hello
- Original Message -
From: Rodolfo Zitellini xhero...@gmail.com
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org;
lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond developeruser meeting in Waltrop, August 24th to 28th
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at
Lucas Gonze lucas.go...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
It is very difficult. It's better to use a front-end editor that
shows some sorta mock-up of the score and that only compiles the
nice LilyPond version from time to
and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se writes:
On 2012-08-02 18:46, Thomas Morley wrote:
fN =
#(define-music-function (parser location fretp) (string?)
(let ((m (make-music 'TextScriptEvent 'text fretp)))
(set! (ly:music-property m 'tweaks)
(acons 'staff-padding 4
On 2012-08-02 20:24, David Kastrup wrote:
Ah, version 2.14.2. In a current version, you could just write
I thought that version 2.14.2 was the current version!?
That is what it says on the web site. Stable version
// Anders
--
English isn't my first language.
So any error or strangeness is
and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se writes:
On 2012-08-02 20:24, David Kastrup wrote:
Ah, version 2.14.2. In a current version, you could just write
I thought that version 2.14.2 was the current version!?
That is what it says on the web site. Stable version
Yes, that's the one we left in
2012/8/2 and...@andis59.se and...@andis59.se:
On 2012-08-02 20:24, David Kastrup wrote:
Ah, version 2.14.2. In a current version, you could just write
I thought that version 2.14.2 was the current version!?
That is what it says on the web site. Stable version
2.14.2 _is_ the current
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:30:19 +0200
Gilles gilles.thiba...@free.fr wrote:
The request is for six commands (NOT markups, but actual music
commands that affect the MIDI output and so on):
\segno
\fine
\tocoda
\coda
\dacapo
\dalsegno
Using the functions described here :
David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com writes:
From the responses so far, it appears that I might as well have asked
for a unicorn, so I'll be quiet now. :)
I don't consider that a fair characterization.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user
FYI --
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Acma-l] Sibelius ProTools . . . Woes?
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:07:28 +0930
From: Robert Pawel Wolf robert.w...@adelaide.edu.au
To: Kevin Austin kevin.aus...@videotron.ca
CC: electroacoust...@concordia.ca, cec-confere...@googlegroups.com,
35 matches
Mail list logo
