On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Glen Larsen glenl@gmail.com wrote:
I often use this when developing guitar tabs so the MIDI output doesn't
double up:
\new TabStaff = Guitar tabs \with {
\remove Staff_performer
}
Excellent! This is just what I was looking for. Many thanks!
Am 08.08.2013 04:29, schrieb SoundsFromSound:
Thoughts?
http://blog.steinberg.net/2013/08/development-diary-part-two/?fb_source=pubv1
For now just one:
Let's see if Kieren's comments on the post provoke _any_ response.
Anybody ready to write a post on lilypondblog.org about polymetrics,
Most scores I do (renaissance choral editions) have no slurs and
hundreds of \melisma and \melismaEnds. My source code would look a lot
nicer if I could redefine ( and ) to mean \melisma and \melismaEnd.
What is wrong with this code?
\version 2.16.1
slurStart = #(make-span-event 'SlurEvent
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going
back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison.
Period.
With LilyPond, you're only limited by your
Vaughan McAlley vaug...@mcalley.net.au writes:
Most scores I do (renaissance choral editions) have no slurs and
hundreds of \melisma and \melismaEnds. My source code would look a lot
nicer if I could redefine ( and ) to mean \melisma and \melismaEnd.
What is wrong with this code?
\version
Am 08.08.2013 10:35, schrieb SoundsFromSound:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going
back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison.
Period.
With
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
The blog did inspire me a little bit, we could add two new glyphs
to the feta font that have
Am 08.08.2013 11:06, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
The blog did inspire me a little bit, we
Urs Liska writes:
And I think that adding text input as an option (if it is thoroughly
thought through) would be a great step forward for the resulting
program.
Aren't they talking about keyboard entry, instead of text input?
Text input is about the storage format. Most wordprocessors have
Am 08.08.2013 11:11, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
And I think that adding text input as an option (if it is thoroughly
thought through) would be a great step forward for the resulting
program.
Aren't they talking about keyboard entry, instead of text input?
Text input is
Am 08.08.2013 11:08, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 08.08.2013 11:06, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of
the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
The
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing a
Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all its
related tools for my everyday work.
So for me using lilypond is a quite natural thing and I am getting
better and quicker using
On 8 August 2013 18:45, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Vaughan McAlley vaug...@mcalley.net.au writes:
Most scores I do (renaissance choral editions) have no slurs and
hundreds of \melisma and \melismaEnds. My source code would look a lot
nicer if I could redefine ( and ) to mean \melisma
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
Maybe because some people don't comment on
Am 08.08.2013 12:47, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
Maybe
SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Frankly, if I were Daniel, I'd be pissed already. I think he is
perfectly correct to remind people that his blog is not the place for
LilyPond
Am 08.08.2013 13:13, schrieb David Kastrup:
SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Frankly, if I were Daniel, I'd be pissed already. I think he is
perfectly correct to remind people that
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
mac-quicktime.
Isn't this just a question of which soundfont is bundled? We distribute
Denemo with
Am 08.08.2013 14:02, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
mac-quicktime.
Isn't this just a question of which
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 08.08.2013 13:13, schrieb David Kastrup:
He does have misconceptions about LilyPond, but his blog is not the
place to address them. Yes, that's unfortunate, but please behave
like one would expect guests to behave. We are not doing our case a
Am 08.08.2013 14:08, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Am 08.08.2013 14:02, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
Francois Planiol alicuota...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably a good news? (many guys downloading lily or consulting
manuals online...)
Maybe...I was wondering about a DDOS, but who knows
Makes it difficult for somebody that I clue in about Lily to take a
look. Anyway, it seems to be back up now.
--
Hi Urs,
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be to
add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get high-quality
audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free soundfonts or
whatever is useful to get this to work.
Agreed.
I have
Am 08.08.2013 15:19, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be to add
a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get high-quality audio
output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free soundfonts or whatever is
Hello,
I've written a bash script and a set of .ly templates to generate scales in
various modes for all 21 pitches.
Should I create a post to show how it's done thanks to the power of LP?
Two sample output files can be found at
http://picpaste.com/aes_Trebble-eUkTiH8o.png and
Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net writes:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
mac-quicktime.
Isn't this just a question of
Oh, forgot to send a CC to the list. And yes, I’m from germany an meant
“b flat minor”, not “b minor” …
Original Message
Subject: Re: Example worth placing in lilyblog?
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:38:11 +0200
From: Malte Meyn malte.m...@mnet-online.de
To: Jacques Menu
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Urs,
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would
be to add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get
high-quality audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful
free soundfonts or
Am 08.08.2013 17:24, schrieb Johan Vromans:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Urs,
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would
be to add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get
high-quality audio output from/through LilyPond,
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing a
Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all its related
tools for my everyday work.
So for me using
At 10:32 08/08/2013 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
I use LibreOffice because the default operation for text is
fine. If I was writing out complex math equations, it'd be a different story.
Surely not: you'd use LibreOffice's Math facility!
Brian Barker
Am 08.08.2013 17:40, schrieb Brian Barker:
At 10:32 08/08/2013 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
I use LibreOffice because the default operation for text is fine. If
I was writing out complex math equations, it'd be a different story.
Surely not: you'd use LibreOffice's Math facility!
Brian Barker
- Original Message -
From: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net
To: LilyPond Users lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Similarly LilyPond is probably not the most appropriate tool for most
people
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing
a Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all
its related tools for
on 2013-08-08 at 14:16 Urs Liska wrote:
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be
to add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get
high-quality audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free
soundfonts or whatever is useful to get
Am 08.08.2013 18:05, schrieb luis jure:
on 2013-08-08 at 14:16 Urs Liska wrote:
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be
to add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get
high-quality audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Message-ID: 1375950947119-148848.p...@n5.nabble.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
2013/8/8 Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl
Generating audio is one of the important reasons to use LilyPond.
I use Timidity++ on a Linux system with CrisisGM351 soundfont, and I
get very acceptable results. I must admit that I cannot remember where I
got this soundfont from, but AFAIK it's
I agree. That's the main reason why I chose to write that comment on this
mailing list vs. his blog post ;)
David Kastrup wrote
SoundsFromSound lt;
soundsfromsound@
gt; writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Frankly, if I
2013/8/7 Glen Larsen glenl@gmail.com
I often use this when developing guitar tabs so the MIDI output doesn't
double up:
\new TabStaff = Guitar tabs \with {
\remove Staff_performer
}
Thanks Glen, I never realized it!
I see that the size of the midi file is reduced by an
SCORE was amazing and practically limitless. Back in the DOS days.
Now, with newer versions of the program? I'd only use it if I was forced.
YMMV
Tim Reeves-3 wrote
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: SoundsFromSound lt;
soundsfromsound@
gt;
To:
lilypond-user@
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
maybe this one?
http://www.bismutnetwork.com/04CrisisGeneralMidi/Soundfont3.0.php
free as in beer, but not Free
I definitely didn't get it from there (you need to register to get a
password).
You can find GM SoundFonts - Crisis GM 3 51 ZSF Edit Sf2
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Would you mind uploading an example somewhere?
Not at all. Do you have a MIDI file you want to have processed?
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
43 matches
Mail list logo
