Re: [Frescobaldi] cannot add lilypond 2.19.57 to lilypond preference

Federico,Thank you for the info.I have been using USB to install lilypond. But I have not try to use it an another computer. I will try to use it on another computer to check it out.I have lilypond v2.19.49, to v2.19.56 on my USB drive and there is no problem to do the frecobaldi lilypond

Re: Rootless slash chords, 2017 edition

Hello Dmitry, > There's been a long standing feature request: > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3909/ > Time to give it another try? If I’m not mistaken, the entire ChordNames context/mechanism is under consideration for Google Summer of Code. Perhaps your best option might be

Re: LSR down?

Hi Harm, Snippets seems to be able to swim all the way over to Australia again now. Andrew On 28 March 2017 at 07:25, Thomas Morley wrote: > > May I ask for feedback whether it works out there as well? > > ___

Rootless slash chords, 2017 edition

Hi, There's been a long standing feature request: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3909/ #3909 a feature to disable the chord root name printing - just print the slash and inversion Over the years, it has been addressed more or less. Time to give it another try? In a few words,

Re: TabStaff answer

You could use \tag to remove the \set, or you could use <<>> to combine \solo with another staff containing only \set and spacer rests. I like using that technique to keep tempos and marks (structure) separate from the actual content. Or, as David mentioned, you could just set

Re: TabStaff answer

Oops Your answer works but there is something else I'd like to be able to do (not to be greedy ...). I like to embed lots of \set TabStaff.minimumFret = ... in music to force the tab to be where I want it. I find that with a small number of hints like this, I can avoid having to specify

Re: LSR down?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:21 PM, caagr98 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n201626...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Works for me. The snippet took a little longer to load than usual, but > that was probably just my internet. > Works for me, too! - Abraham -- View this message in context:

Re: LSR down?

Works for me. The snippet took a little longer to load than usual, but that was probably just my internet. Any idea what made it break (other than just "daylight saving time")? On 03/27/17 22:25, Thomas Morley wrote: 2017-03-27 9:24 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn : Am

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: > David, >> >> Since I already explained this in detail in the first reply, it seems >> like a total waste of effort when you express your complete surprise >> that things work the way I already explained in the first reply. Or >> actually, that the

Re: LSR down?

2017-03-27 9:24 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn : > > > Am 27.03.2017 um 02:30 schrieb Andrew Bernard: >> LSR still down as at 0030 UTC here in Australia. >> >> Andrew > > No time zone problems here so http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=1007 > shows up correctly but the search gives

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

David, On 2017-03-27 at 20:17, David Kastrup wrote: Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: So the result you show printed is _exactly_ the result according to my explanation, yet you say it isn't, possibly because of glossing over half of the explanation, possibly because of

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: >> So the result you show printed is _exactly_ the result according to >> my explanation, yet you say it isn't, possibly because of glossing >> over half of the explanation, possibly because of misunderstanding >> some part of the explanation. >> >>

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Am 27.03.2017 um 19:26 schrieb Kaj Persson: I agree, that my example is a wee to big and too scattered, which I also did comment in my first post. Instead of putting the marks in an own voice I could have included them in the code itself. I thought I made it more clear, but maybe I was wrong.

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

On 03/27/17 19:26, Kaj Persson wrote: I thought, that tags always change the source, but obviously I was wrong. Tags don't actually do anything; they just add a new property to the tagged music expression. \{remove,with}WithTag then recurses through the music expression and removes

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Den 2017-03-27 kl. 18:53, skrev David Kastrup: Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote: Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced the code with the HTML tags ... , a

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: > On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote: >> Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: >> >>> Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced >>> the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been >>> using several

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work - addendum

On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote: Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been using several times before, with good results. Well I take your words Some

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote: Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been using several times before, with good results. Well I take your words Some

Re: Brackets question

Hello David, Yes, I think thez are actually ligatures, hadn’t found them searching for brackets. Thanks! JM > Le 27 mars 2017 à 14:34, David Nalesnik a écrit : > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Bernard > wrote: >> Hi Menu, >>

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes: > Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced > the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been > using several times before, with good results. Well I take your words Some of them at least. I did write an answer. >

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been using several times before, with good results. Well I take your words and send this e-mail again as pure text, which means I cannot paste the images, why I instead

Re: Brackets question

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Menu, > > Well I was suggesting a way of faking it out, rather than being semantically > pure. Not sure that Binchois used such brackets! > > Andrew > > -Original Message- > From: Menu Jacques

Re: Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

70147pers...@telia.com writes: > In movements where the music jumps between different sections marked > with segno signs, one has do deal with those in a quite different way > in the layout and the midi scores. Then the \tag is of good help to > exclude parts in the layout score that has to be

Combining \tag with \quoteDuring does not work

In movements where the music jumps between different sections marked with segno signs, one has do deal with those in a quite different way in the layout and the midi scores. Then the \tag is of good help to exclude parts in the layout score that has to be there in the midi score. Now, if two

RE: Brackets question

Hi Menu, Well I was suggesting a way of faking it out, rather than being semantically pure. Not sure that Binchois used such brackets! Andrew -Original Message- From: Menu Jacques [mailto:imj-...@bluewin.ch] Sent: Monday, 27 March 2017 11:12 PM To: Andrew Bernard

Re: Brackets question

Sorry for not having been more explicit: I saw that when imporing Recordare’s Binchois.xml file into Finale. The meter is 3/4, so it’s no tuplet it seems. > Le 27 mars 2017 à 13:17, Andrew Bernard a écrit : > > Hi Menu, > > Making some assumptions here. > > Andrew

Re: Brackets question

Hi Menu, Making some assumptions here. Andrew == snip \version "2.19.58" treble = { \clef treble \omit TupletNumber \tupletUp \tuplet 5/4 { c'''4 d'''4. } b''8 } bass = { \clef bass \omit TupletNumber \tupletUp \tuplet 5/4 { c4 \stemUp a4. } f8 } \score { \new PianoStaff

Re: lilybin php script (was: Re: (fwd))

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: lilybin infile.ly ---> process infile.ly without downloading from Lilybin server, returns an ID for download lilybin -d ID.pdf lilybin -d ID.midi ---> download results from Lilybin server lilybin -a infile.ly outfile.pdf ---> upload infile.ly

Re: Brackets question

Menu Jacques writes: > Hello, > > These brackets look like analysis brackets, but are not quite as Lily > displays them: > > * > > Maybe they’re something else? What is the meter? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Brackets question

Hello, These brackets look like analysis brackets, but are not quite as Lily displays them: Maybe they’re something else? JM___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Determine if a stem is present

Am 27.03.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Thomas Morley: > 2017-03-27 11:38 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska : >> Hi all, >> >> I want to know if a given notehead has a stem attached. Obviously even >> whole notes do have a stem object, but with zero extent. >> >> I've found the following

Re: Determine if a stem is present

2017-03-27 11:38 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska : > Hi all, > > I want to know if a given notehead has a stem attached. Obviously even > whole notes do have a stem object, but with zero extent. > > I've found the following calculation to be reliable, but I can't imagine > it has to be

Determine if a stem is present

Hi all, I want to know if a given notehead has a stem attached. Obviously even whole notes do have a stem object, but with zero extent. I've found the following calculation to be reliable, but I can't imagine it has to be so complicated: (if (or (= +inf.0 (car stem-y-extent)) (=

Re: (unknown)

Rob Torop writes: > I'm finding that when I use a TabStaff and also set some properties (either > or both of minimumFret and restrainOpenStrings), my first line has an extra > TabStaff! What can I do to get rid of it? Thanks! > > Here's what it looks like: > > [image:

Re:

Others have pointed out the problem to you, but you would have found it yourself by reading the Learning Manual: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/some-common-errors http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/common-errors#an-extra-staff-appears -- Phil Holmes

Re: LSR down?

Am 27.03.2017 um 02:30 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > LSR still down as at 0030 UTC here in Australia. > > Andrew No time zone problems here so http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=1007 shows up correctly but the search gives no results: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=notehead

detect line breaks

Dear list, I'd like to add line numbers to a score. I thought, ackowledging the system-interface might help, but that isn't called in a scheme-engraver: \version "2.19.58" \layout { \context { \Score \consists #(lambda (context) (make-engraver