Hello,
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Fr.
Michael Gilmary, mma [frmichaelgilm...@maronitemonks.org]
Sent: 25 April 2011 19:29
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Carl,
thanks, but increasing system-system-spacing will increase distance
between all system groups.
What I want is increasing just the distance between the lowest staff
line (resp. the Figured Bass line)
and the staff above. It works, but only if there is no Lyrics line
between the two
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:54:24PM -0500, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Could you try
to run ghostscript manually to convert it to pdf (but omit the `-q'
flag)? Like, just run
gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 \
-dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
On 21. april 2011 06:47, Jay Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Helge Haftinghelge.haft...@hist.no wrote:
I am trying to enter a piece by Grieg, which contains the attached
interesting construct.
The manual shows how to write out an arpeggio like this,
using a set of consecutive
2011/4/26 Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no:
2. Cross-staff chords could get simpler too. Switch staff inside
a chord, and lilypond would know to connect the stems.
Cross-staff chords is one of the very first features I tried in
lilypond and could not achieve. I used to teach Finale and
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2011/4/26 Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no:
2. Cross-staff chords could get simpler too. Switch staff inside
a chord, and lilypond would know to connect the stems.
Cross-staff chords is one of the very first features I tried in
lilypond and
Thank you for your answer. This is what I'm looking for.
{ c' e' \tweak #'duration-log #1 g' }
because it respects notehead-styles.
The other method mentioned is limited to one style.
Do you know how breve and longa can be produced with that? #breve or #0.5 does
not give an error, but it also
On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Nils wrote:
Thank you for your answer. This is what I'm looking for.
{ c' e' \tweak #'duration-log #1 g' }
because it respects notehead-styles.
The other method mentioned is limited to one style.
The other one can use any glyph you'd like.
Do you know how
Eventhough I thought I had prevented this it happened :)
That you can rewrite the notehead replacement to any glyph I want does not
change the fact that it is exactly the glyph/notehead I give it. Once the
enviroment changes I have to replace all the noteheads. Imagine this for a
complex piano
On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Nils Hammerfest wrote:
Eventhough I thought I had prevented this it happened :)
That you can rewrite the notehead replacement to any glyph I want does not
change the fact that it is exactly the glyph/notehead I give it. Once the
enviroment changes I have to
On 4/26/11 12:41 AM, Michael Käppler xmichae...@web.de wrote:
Hi Carl,
thanks, but increasing system-system-spacing will increase distance
between all system groups.
What I want is increasing just the distance between the lowest staff
line (resp. the Figured Bass line)
and the staff above.
This code used to work for me about a year ago, but when I try to build
it using 2.13.60, I get the weird error shown in the console log output
at the bottom. Is this a bug or not? I'm running 2.13.60 on Ubuntu 10.04
amd64.
%===
\version 2.13.60
% e.g.
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
This code used to work for me about a year ago, but when I try to build it
using 2.13.60, I get the weird error shown in the console log output at the
bottom. Is this a bug or not? I'm running 2.13.60 on Ubuntu 10.04 amd64.
On Apr 26 AD 2011, at 2:21 AM, James Lowe wrote:
I'm sure that those who know better will give you more detail but
over the last 6 months there have been similar type questions about
ligatures, looking back over these threads they are always led back
to this thread
There have been a few reports of problems with fonts on Macs. These seem all
to be related to a GhostScript upgrade - I think an upgrade to 8.70? Perhaps
you're seeing a similar problem?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Fr. Michael Gilmary, mma
To:
Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
I don't think it's the `-q' that causes the failure, because this
flag only makes ghostscript quiet
And it is not the -q flag as I just ran the command with it.
It is as you say suggest, lilypond is bombing when trying to run
the ghostscript
On Apr 26 AD 2011, at 12:09 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
There have been a few reports of problems with fonts on Macs.
These seem all to be related to a GhostScript upgrade - I think an
upgrade to 8.70? Perhaps you're seeing a similar problem?
Well, from what this machine tells me, the
Looking at the 2.12.3 documentation this did not seem to be appreciably
different...
Anyway, I tooled a bit in my old 2.6.5 world and got a method to work using a
combination of split voices in my variable for the melody, and set associated
voice in the lyrics. It was probably a
Hi!
In this file i have strange autput and this log:
errore di programmazione: No viable beam quanting found. Using unquanted y
value.
continua, incrociare le dita
IV° variazione.ly:55:14: attenzione: strana dimensione del gambo, controllare
di non avere travature strette
Thank's!
--
Dear List,
I have a single clef (treble) with key signature consisting
of one Natural (on 2nd-line G) and one Sharp (on above-
the-staff G), as follows:
\set Staff.keySignature = #`(((0 . 4) . ,NATURAL)
((1 . 4) . ,SHARP))
Unfortunately the PDF
This may fix the issues with Lilypond and 10.6.7; I haven't tested it yet.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4605
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
21 matches
Mail list logo
