Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
Ok, since I am not apparently getting _any_ answers but just unrelated buzzphrases pasted to the top of the quoted communication time and again, I will briefly point out first how we communicate on this list. One quotes the _pertinent_ part of the documentation first, then adds one's answers

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
I wrote the Blended system to fit all of the requirements for redesigning the website (not documentation) for LilyPond. A nice side effect was that I can use it for other things. On Feb 4, 2017 5:59 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > John Roper writes: > > >> On

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
John Roper writes: >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> John Roper writes: >>> >>> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Urs Liska

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 04.02.2017 um 22:16 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> Separating website content from general documentation should definitely >>> be an option. >> What advantages do you expect from it? > > Breaking the technical tie between documentation and website makes

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread Urs Liska
Am 04.02.2017 um 22:16 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Separating website content from general documentation should definitely >> be an option. > What advantages do you expect from it? Breaking the technical tie between documentation and website makes it possible to update the (much smaller) website

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
Design update. It looks better and attracts more users to the software. On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > John Roper writes: > > >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >>> Urs Liska

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
John Roper writes: >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> Urs Liska writes: >>> >>> > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: >>> >> Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper >>> >>

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread Simon Albrecht
A: Because it messes with the order in which people read text. Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing? Just sayin’… :-) Best, Simon On 04.02.2017 22:21, John Roper wrote: It is easier for users to write and it looks better. Blended exports human-readable files. Look at the website.

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
It is easier for users to write and it looks better. Blended exports human-readable files. Look at the website. http://jmroper.com/blended/ On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Urs Liska writes: > > > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: >> Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper >> ha scritto: >>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML >>> site generator that builds from HTML,

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
Blended now has support for *eleven* markup languages and it has a new website! http://jmroper.com/blended/ On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, John Roper wrote: > There is a template system. You setup page templates and Blended inserts > the text from any file into that

Re: Position of fingerings

2017-02-04 Thread SoundsFromSound
Max Xiong wrote > How do I make the first fingering of a chord appear on the top staff line? > > Example: > { > c'^1 e'^3 g'^5 > } > Is there an easy way to make 1 appear on the top staff line and 3 and 5 > above it? Thanks! > > ___ > lilypond-user

Position of fingerings

2017-02-04 Thread Max Xiong
How do I make the first fingering of a chord appear on the top staff line? Example: { } Is there an easy way to make 1 appear on the top staff line and 3 and 5 above it? Thanks! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Multiple markings

2017-02-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/02/17 14:10, David Sumbler wrote: > So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does not > allow multiple marks or tempo markings? Probably because the underlying code makes it very tricky. > > If the answer to that question really is "yes", then perhaps we could > have

Multiple markings

2017-02-04 Thread David Sumbler
A text mark in Lilypond is represented by a grob called a RehearsalMark; the grob for a tempo marking is called a MetronomeMark. I wonder whether perhaps these names reflect something about the history of Lilypond: they are certainly not accurate descriptions of what the objects are used for -

Re: Section repeat

2017-02-04 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 4 Feb 2017, at 01:58, Flaming Hakama by Elaine > wrote: > > Comparing yesterday's version (2 and 4 separate) and A (2&4 together), > > I'd maintain that A describes the music more faithfully, and is > > actually easier to read: when you reach 15 on the 4th-time

Re: Section repeat

2017-02-04 Thread Hans Åberg
Yt was David Wright who wrote what you quote, not me. > On 4 Feb 2017, at 01:58, Flaming Hakama by Elaine > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:12 PM, [David Wright ] > wrote: > > > Comparing yesterday's version (2 and 4 separate) and A